m**1 发帖数: 495 | 1 下室索男怎么办啊?手也是”玩具“
LGBT怎么办啊?对手也是个大号的”玩具“
Cruz defended criminalization of dildos
While solicitor general of Texas, Ted Cruz defended a Texas law prohibiting
the sale of sex toys such as dildos, reports David Corn of Mother Jones.
Cruz’s office filed a long brief reading in part, “There is no substantive
-due-process right to stimulate one’s genitals for non-medical purposes
unrelated to procreation or outside of an interpersonal relationship.”
That is, the pursuit of such happiness had no constitutional standing.
我靠,按这个说法,这些都是违宪的!
来源在这,自己看:
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/04/ted-cruz-dildo-ban- | j*********r 发帖数: 24733 | 2 我不厚道的叫下老王来看看哈。。。
prohibiting
substantive
【在 m**1 的大作中提到】 : 下室索男怎么办啊?手也是”玩具“ : LGBT怎么办啊?对手也是个大号的”玩具“ : Cruz defended criminalization of dildos : While solicitor general of Texas, Ted Cruz defended a Texas law prohibiting : the sale of sex toys such as dildos, reports David Corn of Mother Jones. : Cruz’s office filed a long brief reading in part, “There is no substantive : -due-process right to stimulate one’s genitals for non-medical purposes : unrelated to procreation or outside of an interpersonal relationship.” : That is, the pursuit of such happiness had no constitutional standing. : 我靠,按这个说法,这些都是违宪的!
| f**********n 发帖数: 29853 | 3 没啥。
发春的裸奔已经让我对啥都不恶心了。
谢谢发春。
【在 j*********r 的大作中提到】 : 我不厚道的叫下老王来看看哈。。。 : : prohibiting : substantive
| c******i 发帖数: 4091 | 4 If you’ve been reading Mother Jones, Slate, Gawker, or any pro-Trump sites
recently, first off you have my sympathy. Second off, I feel the need to
address a story that you may have read, specifically the claim that Ted Cruz
once argued that Texas should ban sex toys. It’s an amusing story, but one
that offers exactly zero insight into what positions Cruz actually supports
. |
|