b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 1 CHICAGO — Leaders of more than 20 leading liberal groups supporting both
Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are set to release a scathing letter on
Tuesday that serves as a progressive call to arms against Donald Trump,
imploring Americans to undertake a unified set of concrete steps to oppose
the Republican front-runner — from protesting to organizing large-scale
voter turnout efforts.
“This is a five-alarm fire for our democracy. A hate-peddling bigot who
openly incites violence is the likely presidential nominee of one of our
nation’s two major parties. It is alarming and dangerous. Donald Trump’s
candidacy is a threat to the America we love, and we must respond to him and
what he is stoking as such,” reads the letter, which was obtained first by
POLITICO. It is signed by top officials of Sanders-backing groups like
MoveOn.org and Clinton-backing organizations including the Service Employees
International Union.
Many of these groups have primarily focused on mobilizing their millions of
members — and spending significant sums of money — for their preferred
candidate in the Democratic primary thus far. The letter recognizes a
significant shift in thinking among them, with leaders in the party’s left
wing now setting their sights more squarely on Trump rather than the
protracted battle between Clinton and Sanders. The signatures are
acknowledgments from leaders of those organizations that the time has come
to more seriously confront Trump — who could, they warn, actually win.
“Today we are calling for a massive nonviolent mobilization of working
people, students, immigrants, children of immigrants, great-great-
grandchildren of immigrants, people of color and white people, the
unemployed and under-employed, people of faith, retirees, veterans, women,
and men — anyone who opposes bigotry and hate and loves freedom and justice
— to stand up to Trump’s bullying and bigotry,” the note continues.
Other high-profile signers of the letter — which was set to be released in
the opening hours of voting on Tuesday as Ohio, Illinois, Missouri, North
Carolina and Florida go to the polls — include Michael Brune, executive
director of the Sierra Club; Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice
America; Annie Leonard, executive director of Greenpeace USA; and May Boeve,
executive director of 350 Action. The text encourages more groups to sign
onto the effort.
Anticipating the possibility that the billionaire real estate developer
essentially locks up the Republican nomination on Tuesday — and that he
subsequently pivots to a more widely acceptable message — the letter lists
multiple examples of Trump encouraging violence at his rallies. To fight
back, the group proposes a three-pronged response ahead of November’s
general election, regardless of the Democratic nominee.
First, it encourages nonviolent organizing, which the letter says could take
the form of community rallies, large-scale marches, teach-ins and social
media campaigns.
Its second recommendation is that members directly ask media outlets, public
officials and companies whether they will actively “condemn Trump’s
racism, misogyny and xenophobia.”
And third, the roughly 900-word missive proposes a voter mobilization effort
to drown out Trump’s supporters come the fall — recruiting volunteers for
phone banking and door-knocking.
“If the Republican Party nominates Donald Trump for president — and the
odds are it will — there’s every reason to believe he has a serious shot
at winning the general election,” note the progressives involved in the
effort.
“We cannot afford to underestimate him until it’s too late, as many
Republicans now regret having done during the primaries. If we wait to see
how things shake out to make our plans, it’ll be too late and November will
come sooner than anyone thinks."
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/top-liberal-leaders-call-for-massive-anti-trump-campaign-220760#ixzz42zhWZT19
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook |
c***n
发帖数: 1034 | 2 Yes. Trump is not a joke. Take on him seriously.Trump煽动暴力的言论不受宪法
第一修正案的保护。 |
j*********r
发帖数: 24733 | 3 三德子煽动暴力的事怎么算啊？你家主子在主流媒体上都间接承认了！
【在 c***n 的大作中提到】
: Yes. Trump is not a joke. Take on him seriously.Trump煽动暴力的言论不受宪法
: 第一修正案的保护。
|
l******t
发帖数: 12659 | 4 呵呵，你这就low了一点
【在 c***n 的大作中提到】
: Yes. Trump is not a joke. Take on him seriously.Trump煽动暴力的言论不受宪法
: 第一修正案的保护。
|
s*******1
发帖数: 16479 | 5 我现在完全忽视这个人了
【在 l******t 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵，你这就low了一点
|
z****7
发帖数: 330 | 6 第一修正案保护hate speech. 而这还是专门为了你们左派伟大的MLK前辈提出的.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/02/free-speech
【在 c***n 的大作中提到】
: Yes. Trump is not a joke. Take on him seriously.Trump煽动暴力的言论不受宪法
: 第一修正案的保护。
|
c***n
发帖数: 1034 | 7 "Under the imminent lawless action test, speech is not protected by the
First Amendment if the speaker intends to incite a violation of the law that
is both imminent and likely."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action
【在 z****7 的大作中提到】
: 第一修正案保护hate speech. 而这还是专门为了你们左派伟大的MLK前辈提出的.
: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/02/free-speech
|
z****7
发帖数: 330 | 8 呼唤驱逐非法移民和禁止非美国公民入境哪里算violation of the law了 你们左派大
赦福利以骗选票为中心碾压合法公民利益才是无视law和order好不好
另外你自己都自相矛盾"煽动" = "imminent and likely" 呼唤阅读理解能力
that
【在 c***n 的大作中提到】
: "Under the imminent lawless action test, speech is not protected by the
: First Amendment if the speaker intends to incite a violation of the law that
: is both imminent and likely."
: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action
|
c***n
发帖数: 1034 | 9 “呼唤驱逐非法移民和禁止非美国公民入境”是没有问题的。不受宪法第一修正案保护
的是他说的“kick them out”，“punch him in the face”，“more fun”，“I
will pay the legal fee”。他的这些煽动暴力言论不受宪法第一修正案保护，因为这
些言论导致imminent and realistic支持者对抗议者的施暴。
人们对他的大规模的警惕和反对是因为他的这些言论真实地导致了立即的暴力后果。人
们也有理由相信他未来很可能处于政治考量做出更加危害社会的事情。在我看来这是人
们强烈反对他的原因。
【在 z****7 的大作中提到】
: 呼唤驱逐非法移民和禁止非美国公民入境哪里算violation of the law了 你们左派大
: 赦福利以骗选票为中心碾压合法公民利益才是无视law和order好不好
: 另外你自己都自相矛盾"煽动" = "imminent and likely" 呼唤阅读理解能力
:
: that
|
x*******5
发帖数: 1335 | 10 没看出来这些东西有什么暴力影响
欲加之罪何患无辞!
【在 c***n 的大作中提到】
: “呼唤驱逐非法移民和禁止非美国公民入境”是没有问题的。不受宪法第一修正案保护
: 的是他说的“kick them out”，“punch him in the face”，“more fun”，“I
: will pay the legal fee”。他的这些煽动暴力言论不受宪法第一修正案保护，因为这
: 些言论导致imminent and realistic支持者对抗议者的施暴。
: 人们对他的大规模的警惕和反对是因为他的这些言论真实地导致了立即的暴力后果。人
: 们也有理由相信他未来很可能处于政治考量做出更加危害社会的事情。在我看来这是人
: 们强烈反对他的原因。
|
|
|
c*******4
发帖数: 1874 | 11 kill all chinese就是受宪法保护的？
【在 c***n 的大作中提到】
: “呼唤驱逐非法移民和禁止非美国公民入境”是没有问题的。不受宪法第一修正案保护
: 的是他说的“kick them out”，“punch him in the face”，“more fun”，“I
: will pay the legal fee”。他的这些煽动暴力言论不受宪法第一修正案保护，因为这
: 些言论导致imminent and realistic支持者对抗议者的施暴。
: 人们对他的大规模的警惕和反对是因为他的这些言论真实地导致了立即的暴力后果。人
: 们也有理由相信他未来很可能处于政治考量做出更加危害社会的事情。在我看来这是人
: 们强烈反对他的原因。
|
c***n
发帖数: 1034 | 12 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzU3FLZgIhc
【在 x*******5 的大作中提到】
: 没看出来这些东西有什么暴力影响
: 欲加之罪何患无辞!
|
c*******o
发帖数: 8869 | 13 有道理。
“The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man
falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic. [...] The question
in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and
are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will
bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.”
-----Supreme court justice Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes,
in opinions on Schenck v. United States
【在 c***n 的大作中提到】
: “呼唤驱逐非法移民和禁止非美国公民入境”是没有问题的。不受宪法第一修正案保护
: 的是他说的“kick them out”，“punch him in the face”，“more fun”，“I
: will pay the legal fee”。他的这些煽动暴力言论不受宪法第一修正案保护，因为这
: 些言论导致imminent and realistic支持者对抗议者的施暴。
: 人们对他的大规模的警惕和反对是因为他的这些言论真实地导致了立即的暴力后果。人
: 们也有理由相信他未来很可能处于政治考量做出更加危害社会的事情。在我看来这是人
: 们强烈反对他的原因。
|
c***n
发帖数: 1034 | 14 更为严重的是，Trump的煽动还导致警察非但不抓施暴者，反而将受害者按倒在
地。可见他的言行还导致了公权力执行上的偏袒，这也许是大家更加担心和感到威胁的
问题。
will
【在 c*******o 的大作中提到】
: 有道理。
: “The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man
: falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic. [...] The question
: in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and
: are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will
: bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.”
: -----Supreme court justice Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes,
: in opinions on Schenck v. United States
|
z****7
发帖数: 330 | 15 瞥了下trump的发言
"Hunt for the Chinese"
"Argue with them and get in their face"
"If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun"
恩果然好像有问题的样子
第一句话出处Clinton第二三句出处Obama
Joke都看不懂我也是服了
【在 x*******5 的大作中提到】
: 没看出来这些东西有什么暴力影响
: 欲加之罪何患无辞!
|
j*********r
发帖数: 24733 | 16 三德子才是真正的暴力的煽动者
【在 c***n 的大作中提到】
: 更为严重的是，Trump的煽动还导致警察非但不抓施暴者，反而将受害者按倒在
: 地。可见他的言行还导致了公权力执行上的偏袒，这也许是大家更加担心和感到威胁的
: 问题。
:
: will
|
j*********r
发帖数: 24733 | 17 古今中外搞社会主义共产主义的就没有不暴力的
【在 j*********r 的大作中提到】
: 三德子才是真正的暴力的煽动者
|
