c*******e
发帖数: 5818 | 1 Republicans
By contrast, Republicans select their candidate via a simple, secret-ballot
vote.
There is no shuffling from one corner of the caucus site to the other. There
is no 15 percent viability or realignment. And there's no mathematical
formula to determine delegates awarded at each caucus site.
For example, say there are four candidates (Candidates A, B, C, D), 100
total attendees, and the site awards seven delegates.
Let's assume Candidate A gets support from 35 caucus-goers, B gets 20, C
gets 30, and D gets 15.
Under that scenario:
Candidate A (35 x 7/100) = 2.45…rounded up to 3
Candidate B (20 x 7/100) = 1.4… rounded to 1
Candidate C (30 x 7/100) = 2.1… rounded to 2
Candidate D (15 x 7/100) = 1.05 … rounded to 1
NOTE: Candidate A's 2.45 gets rounded up to 3 because the additional
delegate gets awarded to candidate with the highest decimal point below 0.5
没有15%，所以不shuffle，2nd choice not matter much，但不知道为嘛乘 7% | l*******z
发帖数: 4276 | 2 Or you can look at as 7*35%
ballot
There
【在 c*******e 的大作中提到】
: Republicans
: By contrast, Republicans select their candidate via a simple, secret-ballot
: vote.
: There is no shuffling from one corner of the caucus site to the other. There
: is no 15 percent viability or realignment. And there's no mathematical
: formula to determine delegates awarded at each caucus site.
: For example, say there are four candidates (Candidates A, B, C, D), 100
: total attendees, and the site awards seven delegates.
: Let's assume Candidate A gets support from 35 caucus-goers, B gets 20, C
: gets 30, and D gets 15.
| c*******e
发帖数: 5818 | 3 真是糊渡了，7是这个caucus 有的delegates
【在 l*******z 的大作中提到】
: Or you can look at as 7*35%
:
: ballot
: There
|
|
