由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - 政府谎报天气温度,谎称今年7月份是历史上最热的
相关主题
变暖教机构,在温度上系统性造假。。。。。。Trump要砍NOAA的经费了
脸书上把别人划出朋友圈现在被定义为BullyNIH预算cut 20%
丹麦这种傻逼国家还能住吗?三十年过去了,全球变暖的预言还站得住脚吗?
相信全球气温观测数据精度0.15摄氏度的看过来WSJ:Global Warming Models Are Wrong Again
[合集] 相信全球气温观测数据精度0.15摄氏度的看过来Women turn out to see Palin in Wisconsin, Michigan
白宫阻止专家发布对墨西哥湾原油泄露可能最坏状况的估算数字?佩林在非法移民问题上倒向左派
NOAA在美国最热月度数据上做手脚被抓住,被迫改回来Cars: New form of affordable housing (zz)
Feds: Don't blame California drought on warming又一华妇虎口脱险记 (转载)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: government话题: nasa话题: records话题: noaa
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
Government Agencies Proclaim Bogus Temperature Record
by Dave Blount | August 24, 2015 2:53 pm
If global warming ideology is based in reality, and leftists are the ones
who believe in science, why is it that again and again the government
dissembles about temperature data to prop up this moribund hoax?
NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
announced this week that according to their calculations, July 2015 was the
hottest month since instrumental records began in 1880. …
But government spokespeople rarely mention the inconvenient fact that
these records are being set by less than the uncertainty in the statistics.
NOAA claims an uncertainty of 14 one-hundredths of a degree in its
temperature averages, or near twice the amount by which they say the record
was set. NASA says that their data is typically accurate to one tenth of a
degree, five times the amount by which their new record was set.
So, the new temperature records are meaningless. Neither agency knows
whether a record was set.
Such misrepresentations are now commonplace in NOAA and NASA
announcements. They are regularly proclaiming monthly and yearly records set
by less than the uncertainties in the measurements. Scientists within the
agencies know that this is dishonest.
They also know that Big Government doesn’t hand out money for nothing. From
some it buys votes; from others it buys a “scientific” rationale for its
power grabs. This goes for the recipients of government grants as well as
the employees of government agencies.
In any case temperature records are nonsense because the temperature is not
reliably recorded, and there is data for only a small percentage of the
earth’s surface.
Much of the coverage is so sparse that NASA is forced to make the
ridiculous claim that regions are adequately covered if there is a
temperature-sensing station within nearly 750 miles. This is the distance
between Ottawa, Canada, and Myrtle Beach, S.C. cities with very different
climates. Yet, according to NASA, only one temperature sensing station is
necessary for the two cities and the vast area between them to be adequately
represented in their network.
No matter; data is so heavily massaged anyway that it hardly matters what
numbers they start with.
Credibility has been sacrificed just to convince us that it is getting
warmer. That insufficient government regulation is causing the warming is a
separate issue, as is the doubtful assertion that warming is bad.
If something smells enough like a dead rat, it is probably a dead rat. At
this point the global warming hoax smells so bad that no numbers our
government produces should be taken seriously by anyone.
al-gore-prophet-of-doom
Are people really that gullible?
On tips from Stormfax and Bodhisattva. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.
Source URL: http://rightwingnews.com/climate-change/government-agencies-proclaim-bogus-temperature-record/
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
又一华妇虎口脱险记 (转载)[合集] 相信全球气温观测数据精度0.15摄氏度的看过来
Drill baby drill!白宫阻止专家发布对墨西哥湾原油泄露可能最坏状况的估算数字?
南苏丹总统Kiir一直戴着布什送给他的牛仔帽NOAA在美国最热月度数据上做手脚被抓住,被迫改回来
2007年12月衰退开始以来,美国联邦政府雇员数量增长了12%Feds: Don't blame California drought on warming
变暖教机构,在温度上系统性造假。。。。。。Trump要砍NOAA的经费了
脸书上把别人划出朋友圈现在被定义为BullyNIH预算cut 20%
丹麦这种傻逼国家还能住吗?三十年过去了,全球变暖的预言还站得住脚吗?
相信全球气温观测数据精度0.15摄氏度的看过来WSJ:Global Warming Models Are Wrong Again
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: government话题: nasa话题: records话题: noaa