H**s
发帖数: 38 | 1 Obama’s Unilateral Presidency Crashes Into the Constitution
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/obama-unilateral-presidency-crash
清楚地说明obama care关于state exchange是故意那么写的。
Mr. Obama has one small problem: Jonathan Gruber. The MIT economist and
architect of Obamacare – he who so memorably claimed the law would never
have passed but for the stupidity of American voters – at a conference in
2012 said this: "What’s important to remember politically about this is if
you're a state and you don’t set up an exchange, that means your citizens
don't get their tax credits.”
Denying subsidies to those living in states that failed to set up their own
exchanges was integral to the Affordable Care Act. It was the stick, and the
carrot. But, it failed, because opposition to Obamacare was intense, and
many state legislatures chose to not to participate. They recognized that
the cost of setting up the exchange would be high, and that their citizens
generally opposed the giant overturn of our healthcare industry. Those 37
states that did not set up their own exchanges were lawfully rejecting the
president’s healthcare program – a law passed with not one Republican vote
. | l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 2 去看了, 写的很好. 最有趣的是下面的comments都是一边倒的大骂疤蟆. | s*********e
发帖数: 1814 | 3 把标题和第一行互换下，别人好在点进来之前就知道你在说什么主题 | H**s
发帖数: 38 | 4 换了，多谢提醒。
【在 s*********e 的大作中提到】
: 把标题和第一行互换下，别人好在点进来之前就知道你在说什么主题
| T*********I
发帖数: 10729 | |
|
