由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - California Christians Found ‘Not Guilty’ of Reading Bible Near Gov’t Offices
相关主题
霉D国 老将 愤怒了:连打电话都要交17%的税! (转载)Obama Supporters ‘Fear the Potential for Hubris’
2011年,King James版圣经400年,人类历史上印刷量最大靠,Cruz现在要把机器人在FL打到老三
Study: Christian population shifts from Europe应试教育出来的逻辑思维的误区
穆斯林妇女:“Go put some clothes on, you look naked”这世界变化快:Nancy Pelosi 被打成极右
How Should Christians Vote On November 6th?Kissinger: McCain Best For 'Difficult and Complicated' Time (转载)
Voting for Trump is a morally good choiceWSJ:“人造全球暖化已经死了”
Donald Trump Tells Non-Christians At Rally To Iden所谓的援助船真的是为了人道援助?
两个候选人你都不喜欢,那么把票投给川普的政策Krauthammer:奥巴马终于承认
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: bible话题: california话题: christians话题: reading话题: prove
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
California Christians Found ‘Not Guilty’ of Reading Bible Near Gov’t
Offices
August 16, 2013 Posted by Warner Todd Huston
A court has said that a pair of Christians were “allowed” to read the
Bible aloud outside the Department of Motor Vehicles in Hemet, California.
Wasn’t it kind of the government courts in California to say that these
Christians were allowed to have their rights to free religious expression?
Back in 2011 Mark Mackey and Bret Coronado were arrested and charged with
misdemeanor offenses for reading the Bible outside the DMV location.
But on August 13, Superior Court Judge Timothy Freer found the men “not
guilty” of any offenses.
Prosecutors had to prove that the men needed a permit for their Bible
reading, but were not able to make that case.
According to a full report at Advocates for Faith and Freedom,
In order for the prosecution to prove that a permit was required under
Title 13, Section 1860 of the California Administrative Code, it was
required to prove that the defendants were engaged in a “demonstration or
gathering” as defined in Section 1851. Judge Freer ruled that there was
insufficient evidence to prove that the men conducted either a “
demonstration or gathering.” Both definitions require that the conduct of
defendants was such that it had “the effect, intent or propensity to draw a
crowd or onlookers” and the prosecution couldn’t prove that to be the
case.
“The prosecution failed to meet its burden of proof that our clients
committed a crime when they read the Bible aloud in front a line of people,
” said AFF attorney Robert Taylor.
Interestingly, the judge also pointed out that the law prosecutors tried to
invoke was likely unconstitutional as it gave law enforcement overbroad
powers to quash public gatherings in the first place. Sadly, this case did
not go toward settling the constitutionality of the law, but it was a
victory of sorts to have the judge even mention the fact.
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
Krauthammer:奥巴马终于承认How Should Christians Vote On November 6th?
穷人、富人都要革命Voting for Trump is a morally good choice
Pew: Fox News Channel America’s No.1 Source for TV NewsDonald Trump Tells Non-Christians At Rally To Iden
共和党初选谁会赢?两个候选人你都不喜欢,那么把票投给川普的政策
霉D国 老将 愤怒了:连打电话都要交17%的税! (转载)Obama Supporters ‘Fear the Potential for Hubris’
2011年,King James版圣经400年,人类历史上印刷量最大靠,Cruz现在要把机器人在FL打到老三
Study: Christian population shifts from Europe应试教育出来的逻辑思维的误区
穆斯林妇女:“Go put some clothes on, you look naked”这世界变化快:Nancy Pelosi 被打成极右
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: bible话题: california话题: christians话题: reading话题: prove