c*****g
发帖数: 21627 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: whiteclouds2 (// 参考消息 //), 信区: Military
标 题: ！！！纽约时报：F.B.I. 自酿的恐怖主义
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Apr 21 00:28:22 2013, 美东)
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plot
Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I.
By DAVID K. SHIPLER
Published: April 28, 2012
THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in
recent years — or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was
intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot
Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y
.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon
and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts.
But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents
and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4
explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. Suspects na&#
239;vely played their parts until they were arrested.
When an Oregon college student, Mohamed Osman Mohamud, thought of using a
car bomb to attack a festive Christmas-tree lighting ceremony in Portland,
the F.B.I. provided a van loaded with six 55-gallon drums of “inert
material,” harmless blasting caps, a detonator cord and a gallon of diesel
fuel to make the van smell flammable. An undercover F.B.I. agent even did
the driving, with Mr. Mohamud in the passenger seat. To trigger the bomb the
student punched a number into a cellphone and got no boom, only a bust.
This is legal, but is it legitimate? Without the F.B.I., would the culprits
commit violence on their own? Is cultivating potential terrorists the best
use of the manpower designed to find the real ones? Judging by their
official answers, the F.B.I. and the Justice Department are sure of
themselves — too sure, perhaps.
Carefully orchestrated sting operations usually hold up in court. Defendants
invariably claim entrapment and almost always lose, because the law
requires that they show no predisposition to commit the crime, even when
induced by government agents. To underscore their predisposition, many
suspects are “warned about the seriousness of their plots and given
opportunities to back out,” said Dean Boyd, a Justice Department spokesman.
But not always, recorded conversations show. Sometimes they are coaxed to
continue.
Undercover operations, long practiced by the F.B.I., have become a mainstay
of counterterrorism, and they have changed in response to the post-9/11
focus on prevention. “Prior to 9/11 it would be very unusual for the F.B.I.
to present a crime opportunity that wasn’t in the scope of the activities
that a person was already involved in,” said Mike German of the American
Civil Liberties Union, a lawyer and former F.B.I. agent who infiltrated
white supremacist groups. An alleged drug dealer would be set up to sell
drugs to an undercover agent, an arms trafficker to sell weapons. That still
happens routinely, but less so in counterterrorism, and for good reason.
“There isn’t a business of terrorism in the United States, thank God,” a
former federal prosecutor, David Raskin, explained.
“You’re not going to be able to go to a street corner and find somebody
who’s already blown something up,” he said. Therefore, the usual goal is
not “to find somebody who’s already engaged in terrorism but find somebody
who would jump at the opportunity if a real terrorist showed up in town.”
And that’s the gray area. Who is susceptible? Anyone who plays along with
the agents, apparently. Once the snare is set, law enforcement sees no
choice. “Ignoring such threats is not an option,” Mr. Boyd argued, “given
the possibility that the suspect could act alone at any time or find
someone else willing to help him.”
Typically, the stings initially target suspects for pure speech — comments
to an informer outside a mosque, angry postings on Web sites, e-mails with
radicals overseas — then woo them into relationships with informers, who
are often convicted felons working in exchange for leniency, or with F.B.I.
agents posing as members of Al Qaeda or other groups.
Some targets have previous involvement in more than idle talk: for example,
Waad Ramadan Alwan, an Iraqi in Kentucky, whose fingerprints were found on
an unexploded roadside bomb near Bayji, Iraq, and Raja Khan of Chicago, who
had sent funds to an Al Qaeda leader in Pakistan.
But others seem ambivalent, incompetent and adrift, like hapless wannabes
looking for a cause that the informer or undercover agent skillfully helps
them find. Take the Stinger missile defendant James Cromitie, a low-level
drug dealer with a criminal record that included no violence or hate crime,
despite his rants against Jews. “He was searching for answers within his
Islamic faith,” said his lawyer, Clinton W. Calhoun III, who has appealed
his conviction. “And this informant, I think, twisted that search in a
really pretty awful way, sort of misdirected Cromitie in his search and
turned him towards violence.”
THE informer, Shahed Hussain, had been charged with fraud, but avoided
prison and deportation by working undercover in another investigation. He
was being paid by the F.B.I. to pose as a wealthy Pakistani with ties to
Jaish-e-Mohammed, a terrorist group that Mr. Cromitie apparently had never
heard of before they met by chance in the parking lot of a mosque.
“Brother, did you ever try to do anything for the cause of Islam?” Mr.
Hussain asked at one point.
“O.K., brother,” Mr. Cromitie replied warily, “where you going with this,
brother?”
Two days later, the informer told him, “Allah has more work for you to do,
” and added, “Revelation is going to come in your dreams that you have to
do this thing, O.K.?” About 15 minutes later, Mr. Hussain proposed the idea
of using missiles, saying he could get them in a container from China. Mr.
Cromitie laughed.
Reading hundreds of pages of transcripts of the recorded conversations is
like looking at the inkblots of a Rorschach test. Patterns of willingness
and hesitation overlap and merge. “I don’t want anyone to get hurt,” Mr.
Cromitie said, and then explained that he meant women and children. “I don
’t care if it’s a whole synagogue of men.” It took 11 months of
meandering discussion and a promise of $250,000 to lead him, with three co-
conspirators he recruited, to plant fake bombs at two Riverdale synagogues.
“Only the government could have made a ‘terrorist’ out of Mr. Cromitie,
whose buffoonery is positively Shakespearean in its scope,” said Judge
Colleen McMahon, sentencing him to 25 years. She branded it a “fantasy
terror operation” but called his attempt “beyond despicable” and rejected
his claim of entrapment.
The judge’s statement was unusual, but Mr. Cromitie’s characteristics were
not. His incompetence and ambivalence could be found among other aspiring
terrorists whose grandiose plans were nurtured by law enforcement. They
included men who wanted to attack fuel lines at Kennedy International
Airport; destroy the Sears Tower (now Willis Tower) in Chicago; carry out a
suicide bombing near Tampa Bay, Fla., and bomb subways in New York and
Washington. Of the 22 most frightening plans for attacks since 9/11 on
American soil, 14 were developed in sting operations.
Another New York City subway plot, which recently went to trial, needed no
help from government. Nor did a bombing attempt in Times Square, the
abortive underwear bombing in a jetliner over Detroit, a planned attack on
Fort Dix, N.J., and several smaller efforts. Some threats are real, others
less so. In terrorism, it’s not easy to tell the difference.
David K. Shipler is the author of “Rights at Risk: The Limits of Liberty in
Modern America.” | A*****a
发帖数: 52743 | 2 这是奥黑的FBI?
【在 c*****g 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
: 发信人: whiteclouds2 (// 参考消息 //), 信区: Military
: 标 题: ！！！纽约时报：F.B.I. 自酿的恐怖主义
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Apr 21 00:28:22 2013, 美东)
: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plot
: Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I.
: By DAVID K. SHIPLER
: Published: April 28, 2012
: THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in
: recent years — or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was
| b******o
发帖数: 5644 | 3 觉得FBI在这件事上错的不多。要是那俩没犯事，能拿他怎么样？有不能象天朝一样没
事就请喝咖啡。要是总这样人盯人，债还不更上天了？没事别接那些不着四六的难民就
是了。不过这个好像也政治不正确。 |
|
