l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 “It’s exactly this sort of thing that drives people into the arms of the
NRA.”
by Rick aka Mr. Brutally Honest
This, introduced to the legislature in the state of Washington, is more than
simply alarming:
Forget police drones flying over your house. How about police coming
inside, once a year, to have a look around?
As Orwellian as that sounds, it isn’t hypothetical. The notion of
police home inspections was introduced in a bill last week in Olympia.
That it’s part of one of the major gun-control efforts pains me. It
seemed in recent weeks lawmakers might be headed toward somecommon-sense
regulation of gun sales. But then last week they went too far. By mistake,
they claim. But still too far.
“They always say, we’ll never go house to house to take your guns away
. But then you see this, and you have to wonder.”
That’s no gun-rights absolutist talking, but Lance Palmer, a Seattle
trial lawyer and self-described liberal who brought the troubling Senate
Bill 5737to my attention. It’s the long-awaited assault-weapons ban,
introduced last week by three Seattle Democrats.
Responding to the Newtown school massacre, the bill would ban the sale
of semi-automatic weapons that use detachable ammunition magazines. Clips
that contain more than 10 rounds would be illegal.
But then, with respect to the thousands of weapons like that already
owned by Washington residents, the bill says this:
“In order to continue to possess an assault weapon that was legally
possessed on the effective date of this section, the person possessing shall
... safely and securely store the assault weapon. The sheriff of the county
may, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to ensure compliance
with this subsection.”
In other words, come into homes without a warrant to poke around.
Failure to comply could get you up to a year in jail.
“I’m a liberal Democrat — I’ve voted for only one Republican in my
life,” Palmer told me. “But now I understand why my right-wing opponents
worry about having to fight a government takeover.”
He added: “It’s exactly this sort of thing that drives people into the
arms of the NRA.”
I have been blasting the NRA for its paranoia in the gun-control debate.
But Palmer is right — you can’t fully blame them, when cops going door-to
-door shows up in legislation.
I spoke to two of the sponsors. One, Sen. Adam Kline, D-Seattle, a
lawyer who typically is hyper-attuned to civil-liberties issues, said he did
not know the bill authorized police searches because he had not read it
closely before signing on.
“I made a mistake,” Kline said. “I frankly should have vetted this
more closely.”
That lawmakers sponsor bills they haven’t read is common. Still, it’s
disappointing on one of this political magnitude. Not counting a long table,
it’s only an eight-page bill.
The prime sponsor, Sen. Ed Murray, D-Seattle, also condemned the search
provision in his own bill, after I asked him about it. He said Palmer is
right that it’s probably unconstitutional.
“I have to admit that shouldn’t be in there,” Murray said.
He said he came to realize that an assault-weapons ban has little chance
of passing this year anyway. So he put in this bill more as “a general
statement, as a guiding light of where we need to go.” Without sweating all
the details.
A guiding light of where we need to go? Seriously?
I find it incredible that we're reading this sort of thing in America.
Just incredible.
The founding fathers are doing synchronized spinning in their graves.
God help us. | l******t
发帖数: 12659 | |
|
