l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 by Jammie
Maybe those Obama administration members shouldn’t have divulged national
security secrets to the film-makers considering how violent Islamists can
get over videos.
Oh, wait…
Could the release of “Zero Dark Thirty” provoke violent protests
against the U.S. in response to the film’s searing depictions of “enhanced
interrogation” — the coercive, super-secret and bitterly debated methods
used by the CIA against al Qaeda terrorism suspects?
Oscar-winning director Kathryn Bigelow’s acclaimed docudrama about the
pursuit of Osama bin Laden opened Wednesday at five theaters in New York and
Los Angeles.
The film, an early Oscar favorite, graphically depicts coercive CIA
interrogation techniques, including the waterboarding, domination and
psychosexual humiliation of a detainee, who is, variously, collared and
leashed like a dog, stuffed into a cramped “confinement box” and stripped
naked for questioning in the presence of a female investigator.
Although the portrayal of such treatment given to a prisoner, regardless
of his religion, may be deemed offensive by viewers of any faith, the film
steers clear of depicting Islam’s Prophet Muhammad or showing the Koran
being desecrated — two acts considered blasphemous by many Muslims.
Muslims have expressed outrage in response to the anti-Islam video “
Innocence of Muslims,” the unintentional burning of Korans and a caricature
of the Prophet Muhammad in a Danish newspaper.
They find something every day to be outrageously outraged over, don’t they?
Claims that the Obama administration provided the “Zero Dark Thirty”
filmmakers special access to high-level national security officials and
shared sensitive information about the bin Laden raid have led to an
internal Pentagon investigation of suspected security leaks.
So if anything happens we can blame Obama. |
|
