C****n
发帖数: 2324 | 1 Just watch an video, very interesting argument.
Obama talk about back to the Clinton era tax (started 1993).
However, $250K in 1993 equal to almost $450K today.
So, if we really want to go back to Clinton era tax bracket, at least we
need to adjust it by inflation.
Obama didn't do it on purpose. Why? TAXing the middle class is the real goal.
Taxing on $250K+ today is a much heavier tax than Clinton era tax! | S**C
发帖数: 2964 | 2 Before you make such a fuss, should you firstly check tax brackets in 1993?
What conservatives should do is to insist to cut the spending level to
Clinton era.
goal.
【在 C****n 的大作中提到】
: Just watch an video, very interesting argument.
: Obama talk about back to the Clinton era tax (started 1993).
: However, $250K in 1993 equal to almost $450K today.
: So, if we really want to go back to Clinton era tax bracket, at least we
: need to adjust it by inflation.
: Obama didn't do it on purpose. Why? TAXing the middle class is the real goal.
: Taxing on $250K+ today is a much heavier tax than Clinton era tax!
| G*******1
发帖数: 6411 | 3 good point. 应该考虑通胀因素。
goal.
【在 C****n 的大作中提到】
: Just watch an video, very interesting argument.
: Obama talk about back to the Clinton era tax (started 1993).
: However, $250K in 1993 equal to almost $450K today.
: So, if we really want to go back to Clinton era tax bracket, at least we
: need to adjust it by inflation.
: Obama didn't do it on purpose. Why? TAXing the middle class is the real goal.
: Taxing on $250K+ today is a much heavier tax than Clinton era tax!
| P*O
发帖数: 4324 | 4 税务局只考虑怎样收上来的税最多，什么middle class都是幌子。就说这个25万，为啥
是单身20万，家庭25万呢，讲公平，家庭应该40万, 显然40万以上的家庭太少了，所谓
的富人家庭大部分都是集中在25万至40万，估计也就是东西岸的双职工高科技民工。
只有从每个人头上包括穷人头上敛财才会富，这点看看那些穷国里冒出来的巨富的独裁
者就知道了。 |
|
