m*********a
发帖数: 3299 | 1 连这个多不清楚，就迫不及待外他们偏护。皇帝不急太监急。
DON'T pretend to be a victim, when in reality the rich enjoy great
advantages in this country. Don't try to deny this. It will only lead to the
conclusion that you are not mature enough to have a serious discussion.
Answer this question first, "is the rich in a distressed or worse condition
than what was before, in any time of the history?"
If you don't know this, I will illustrate a few things enjoyed by riches.
1. Inventing the offshore accounting rules, so basically avoiding paying
nothing in taxes. The fine example is GE.
2. categorizing incomes into different kinds. The kind that the rich gets
have the lowest tax rate ever, which is capped to 15%, and does not have to
pay social security and medicare taxes on them.
3. MOST IMPORTANT. They invented limited liability rule of corporations.
Their personal wealthy is shielded from the risk of doing business.
This is so huge for the riches. They could take unlimited risk and make a
killing on billions of profit and pass the money to their personal coffer.
When the company is bankrupted, they still enjoy billions of their wealthy.
In 20s, when BANKs and companies are bankruptied, the rich guys have to kill
themselves, in order not to pay the debts. IT IS DIFFERENT NOW. And they
don't have to.
The subprime mortgage company CEO paid himself several billions dollars of
money, by betting "successfully' on house. But when subprime scam was over,
the CEO is several billions dollar rich. And taxpayers pick up the debts of
the bankrupted company. Bankruptcy law is not written to get back the money
from CEOs. In the old day, this CEO had to kill himself to pay the mistake. |
l******g
发帖数: 6771 | 2 +1
the
condition
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: 连这个多不清楚，就迫不及待外他们偏护。皇帝不急太监急。
: DON'T pretend to be a victim, when in reality the rich enjoy great
: advantages in this country. Don't try to deny this. It will only lead to the
: conclusion that you are not mature enough to have a serious discussion.
: Answer this question first, "is the rich in a distressed or worse condition
: than what was before, in any time of the history?"
: If you don't know this, I will illustrate a few things enjoyed by riches.
: 1. Inventing the offshore accounting rules, so basically avoiding paying
: nothing in taxes. The fine example is GE.
: 2. categorizing incomes into different kinds. The kind that the rich gets
|
c******i
发帖数: 4091 | 3 你这个李双双吃黑屎涂鞋油之余，说说联储会是代表超富还是穷人的？
民主党誓死捍卫联储会反对audit FED是怎么回事？
尼玛你个票蛆除了奉旨吃屎有啥遗愿智力。
the
condition
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: 连这个多不清楚，就迫不及待外他们偏护。皇帝不急太监急。
: DON'T pretend to be a victim, when in reality the rich enjoy great
: advantages in this country. Don't try to deny this. It will only lead to the
: conclusion that you are not mature enough to have a serious discussion.
: Answer this question first, "is the rich in a distressed or worse condition
: than what was before, in any time of the history?"
: If you don't know this, I will illustrate a few things enjoyed by riches.
: 1. Inventing the offshore accounting rules, so basically avoiding paying
: nothing in taxes. The fine example is GE.
: 2. categorizing incomes into different kinds. The kind that the rich gets
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 4 晕倒, 这位什么都不懂就开始瞎喷.
楼上还加1.真是领教无脑左派是什么样了.
. Inventing the offshore accounting rules, so basically avoiding paying
nothing in taxes. The fine example is GE.
=================
有一个国际税收名词叫international tax treaty.
=================
categorizing incomes into different kinds. The kind that the rich gets
have the lowest tax rate ever, which is capped to 15%, and does not have to
pay social security and medicare taxes on them.
================
原来收入不是和风险成正比的? 你投资的收入的风险和白领每月拿工资的风险是一样
的？
===========================
They invented limited liability rule of corporations.
Their personal wealthy is shielded from the risk of doing business.
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
呵呵, 你买了一家公司的股票，你就是这个公司的所有人了, 然后按照你的理论, 如果
这家公司破产了，你就要把家里所有的资产赔给破产公司的债权人？ 这个要多沙比才
能这么认为啊. |
l******g
发帖数: 6771 | 5 不错，对合理犯规解释清楚
+2，呵呵
to
【在 l****z 的大作中提到】
: 晕倒, 这位什么都不懂就开始瞎喷.
: 楼上还加1.真是领教无脑左派是什么样了.
: . Inventing the offshore accounting rules, so basically avoiding paying
: nothing in taxes. The fine example is GE.
: =================
: 有一个国际税收名词叫international tax treaty.
: =================
: categorizing incomes into different kinds. The kind that the rich gets
: have the lowest tax rate ever, which is capped to 15%, and does not have to
: pay social security and medicare taxes on them.
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 6 犯规？ 犯什么规了？ 谁的规？
【在 l******g 的大作中提到】
: 不错，对合理犯规解释清楚
: +2，呵呵
:
: to
|
l******g
发帖数: 6771 | 7 犯了合理精神的规，个人意见
【在 l****z 的大作中提到】
: 犯规？ 犯什么规了？ 谁的规？
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 8 哪里不合理了? 这个可以讨论啊.
international tax treaty就是为了合理才出台的哦.其实看看别的国家对公司在其他
国家的收入怎么处理的不就知道了嘛.
【在 l******g 的大作中提到】
: 犯了合理精神的规，个人意见
|
C*******r
发帖数: 10345 | 9 the company is bankrupted, they still enjoy billions of their wealthy
when BANKs and companies are bankruptied
invented limited liability rule of corporations. Their personal wealthy is
shielded from the risk of doing business
尼玛，连有限公司都能扯进来。这种狗屁阴文，现在连唐人街送外卖的船民也变成业余
经济学家了。 |
C****n
发帖数: 2324 | 10 首先， 不要偷换概念。
我发现奥巴马最大的本事就是偷换概念。
富人 ！＝ $200K+
That's important.
Obama's TAX hike will NOT touch the rich at all. It only hurts the working
class.
If you really want touch the rich, raise tax on wealth, not on INCOME.
People making $200K, heck, even $500K, is just on their way to be
financially free, has nothing to do with rich.
Most rich people may not make any money per year on book.
TAXing on property or wealth may be a moral solution, as THAT is targetting
the RICH. TAXing on $200K+ is hurting the working hard and responsible!
So what Obama is trying to do is to prevent any middle class from becoming
financial free, and even force you finally depend on the government.
the
condition
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: 连这个多不清楚，就迫不及待外他们偏护。皇帝不急太监急。
: DON'T pretend to be a victim, when in reality the rich enjoy great
: advantages in this country. Don't try to deny this. It will only lead to the
: conclusion that you are not mature enough to have a serious discussion.
: Answer this question first, "is the rich in a distressed or worse condition
: than what was before, in any time of the history?"
: If you don't know this, I will illustrate a few things enjoyed by riches.
: 1. Inventing the offshore accounting rules, so basically avoiding paying
: nothing in taxes. The fine example is GE.
: 2. categorizing incomes into different kinds. The kind that the rich gets
|
|
|
m*********a
发帖数: 3299 | 11 It seems that you do not know the GOP's tax plan.
They want to cap the deductible to $17,000. If you do some math, GOP's tax
plan will get more money from the people making $300K than Obama's, while
protecting the low tax rate enjoyed by the very wealthy.
【在 C****n 的大作中提到】
: 首先， 不要偷换概念。
: 我发现奥巴马最大的本事就是偷换概念。
: 富人 ！＝ $200K+
: That's important.
: Obama's TAX hike will NOT touch the rich at all. It only hurts the working
: class.
: If you really want touch the rich, raise tax on wealth, not on INCOME.
: People making $200K, heck, even $500K, is just on their way to be
: financially free, has nothing to do with rich.
: Most rich people may not make any money per year on book.
|
b*******h
发帖数: 2585 | 12 这个我也支持。极右派一直不能认清的事实就是美国贫富差距越来越大， 中产阶级日
趋破产。难道能说干活赋税的中产阶级越来越懒？极少数富人越来越勤快？到美国来的
中国人， 有多少是冲着福利来的？不要说老黑老墨，那么多中国人失业找不到工作，
都是因为懒？说这种话有说服力么？
你可以说这是黑8无能的结果，但是不要说没有工作的人懒。
中产阶级缩小的情况不改变，GOP的BASE就会越来越少。 |
C****n
发帖数: 2324 | 13 If that's the case, why don't Obama agree? It seems work the best for both
parties.
I am one of the top 2%. And I prefer closing the loophole instead of raising
TAX. Simply because I can control my morgage payment, or living in a
smaller house, so I have more money left for myself.
Under Obama's plan, I have to spend as much as possible, buy a house as
bigger as possible, or else, I will be taxed anyway.
I think the morgage is one of the reasons created housing bubble.
The basic difference between GOP and DEM, in my opinion is:
GOP trust people, put your responsibility in your own hand, and you are free
to choose what life you want to live.
DEM think most people are stupid, and incapable of making right decisions.
So they want your money, and tell you how to live. To me, it's controlling
people's freedom.
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: It seems that you do not know the GOP's tax plan.
: They want to cap the deductible to $17,000. If you do some math, GOP's tax
: plan will get more money from the people making $300K than Obama's, while
: protecting the low tax rate enjoyed by the very wealthy.
|
m*********a
发帖数: 3299 | 14 自以为是的傻x。以为在板上有你个和你一样的傻x 上奔下跳，就可以代表
华裔亚裔犹太裔。亚裔早就看到你们这些傻x的无知和可笑。
十年前，亚裔还是50%/50%的投票的，变为几年前的60%/40%。到现在的75%/25%的投民
主党，就是就的你们这些傻x代表的偏激和无知。
不要说亚裔和犹太裔是向黑人一样低收入，低智商的。
亚裔和犹太在美国收入最高，受教育程度也最高。
【在 C*******r 的大作中提到】
: the company is bankrupted, they still enjoy billions of their wealthy
: when BANKs and companies are bankruptied
: invented limited liability rule of corporations. Their personal wealthy is
: shielded from the risk of doing business
: 尼玛，连有限公司都能扯进来。这种狗屁阴文，现在连唐人街送外卖的船民也变成业余
: 经济学家了。
|
l******t
发帖数: 12659 | 15 good points. thanks for sharing.
raising
free
【在 C****n 的大作中提到】
: If that's the case, why don't Obama agree? It seems work the best for both
: parties.
: I am one of the top 2%. And I prefer closing the loophole instead of raising
: TAX. Simply because I can control my morgage payment, or living in a
: smaller house, so I have more money left for myself.
: Under Obama's plan, I have to spend as much as possible, buy a house as
: bigger as possible, or else, I will be taxed anyway.
: I think the morgage is one of the reasons created housing bubble.
: The basic difference between GOP and DEM, in my opinion is:
: GOP trust people, put your responsibility in your own hand, and you are free
|
l******t
发帖数: 12659 | 16 这么说吧，每个人代表的都是自己的观点
你也不需要以为大多数投票的华裔就一定是对美国经济最好的选择
is
业余
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: 自以为是的傻x。以为在板上有你个和你一样的傻x 上奔下跳，就可以代表
: 华裔亚裔犹太裔。亚裔早就看到你们这些傻x的无知和可笑。
: 十年前，亚裔还是50%/50%的投票的，变为几年前的60%/40%。到现在的75%/25%的投民
: 主党，就是就的你们这些傻x代表的偏激和无知。
: 不要说亚裔和犹太裔是向黑人一样低收入，低智商的。
: 亚裔和犹太在美国收入最高，受教育程度也最高。
|
C****n
发帖数: 2324 | 17 Absolutely!
And that's what Obama is doing, kill the middle class, and DEM wins forever.
Redistribution is always a wrong idea. We need to change the current system
to make it more fair to everybody.
You must heard of this:
授人以鱼， 不如授人以渔。
， |
m*********a
发帖数: 3299 | 18 我承认你说的有可能是对的。
那你也承认你以为的也有可能是错的？
【在 l******t 的大作中提到】
: 这么说吧，每个人代表的都是自己的观点
: 你也不需要以为大多数投票的华裔就一定是对美国经济最好的选择
:
: is
: 业余
|
l******g
发帖数: 6771 | 19 do both, raise tax rate and close the loopholes
raising
free
【在 C****n 的大作中提到】
: If that's the case, why don't Obama agree? It seems work the best for both
: parties.
: I am one of the top 2%. And I prefer closing the loophole instead of raising
: TAX. Simply because I can control my morgage payment, or living in a
: smaller house, so I have more money left for myself.
: Under Obama's plan, I have to spend as much as possible, buy a house as
: bigger as possible, or else, I will be taxed anyway.
: I think the morgage is one of the reasons created housing bubble.
: The basic difference between GOP and DEM, in my opinion is:
: GOP trust people, put your responsibility in your own hand, and you are free
|
l******g
发帖数: 6771 | 20 表骂人，没有用
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: 自以为是的傻x。以为在板上有你个和你一样的傻x 上奔下跳，就可以代表
: 华裔亚裔犹太裔。亚裔早就看到你们这些傻x的无知和可笑。
: 十年前，亚裔还是50%/50%的投票的，变为几年前的60%/40%。到现在的75%/25%的投民
: 主党，就是就的你们这些傻x代表的偏激和无知。
: 不要说亚裔和犹太裔是向黑人一样低收入，低智商的。
: 亚裔和犹太在美国收入最高，受教育程度也最高。
|
|
|
b*******h
发帖数: 2585 | 21 People making $200K, heck, even $500K, is just on their way to be
financially free, has nothing to do with rich.
this is true.
Obama should tax the wealth, not income.but that would make him a commie
【在 C****n 的大作中提到】
: 首先， 不要偷换概念。
: 我发现奥巴马最大的本事就是偷换概念。
: 富人 ！＝ $200K+
: That's important.
: Obama's TAX hike will NOT touch the rich at all. It only hurts the working
: class.
: If you really want touch the rich, raise tax on wealth, not on INCOME.
: People making $200K, heck, even $500K, is just on their way to be
: financially free, has nothing to do with rich.
: Most rich people may not make any money per year on book.
|
l******g
发帖数: 6771 | 22 how？
【在 b*******h 的大作中提到】
: People making $200K, heck, even $500K, is just on their way to be
: financially free, has nothing to do with rich.
: this is true.
: Obama should tax the wealth, not income.but that would make him a commie
|
C****n
发帖数: 2324 | 23 Let's go back to Clinton era tax rate, I have no problem with that.
And close loopholes.
Just don't tell me, I am the only one going back to higher tax rate, and you
still enjoy lower rate. That's what the top 2% asking for.
【在 l******g 的大作中提到】
: do both, raise tax rate and close the loopholes
:
: raising
: free
|
b*******h
发帖数: 2585 | 24 that is a good question. 赤字就是对货币财富的TAX。 但是富人的财富还有其他形
式。
历史上，对收入收税而不是财富收税是一个巨大进步。 减少社会动荡。
如果政府能对土地按担而不是按亩收税，该朝换代就没有那么多
【在 l******g 的大作中提到】
: how？
|
b*******h
发帖数: 2585 | 25 你这个就不是很有意思了。人家GOP议员只是用这个来讨价还价。
you
【在 C****n 的大作中提到】
: Let's go back to Clinton era tax rate, I have no problem with that.
: And close loopholes.
: Just don't tell me, I am the only one going back to higher tax rate, and you
: still enjoy lower rate. That's what the top 2% asking for.
|
m*********a
发帖数: 3299 | 26 那好吧，就先回到克林顿的税率。
如果那时，民主党提一个议案，
单单给250K一下的人降税，将SSI税从6.2%降到4.2%。
您支持不？
you
【在 C****n 的大作中提到】
: Let's go back to Clinton era tax rate, I have no problem with that.
: And close loopholes.
: Just don't tell me, I am the only one going back to higher tax rate, and you
: still enjoy lower rate. That's what the top 2% asking for.
|
C****n
发帖数: 2324 | 27 Of course not!
We are not talking how both side will do here, are we? I thought we are
talking about what is the right thing to do here.
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: 那好吧，就先回到克林顿的税率。
: 如果那时，民主党提一个议案，
: 单单给250K一下的人降税，将SSI税从6.2%降到4.2%。
: 您支持不？
:
: you
|
U*L
发帖数: 1449 | 28
the
condition
Apparently either you have not received proper college level education, or
you are just plain stupid. Either way that's probably why you are living on
welfare and want a bigger free lunch. Can't blame you for the position you
are in.
【在 m*********a 的大作中提到】
: 连这个多不清楚，就迫不及待外他们偏护。皇帝不急太监急。
: DON'T pretend to be a victim, when in reality the rich enjoy great
: advantages in this country. Don't try to deny this. It will only lead to the
: conclusion that you are not mature enough to have a serious discussion.
: Answer this question first, "is the rich in a distressed or worse condition
: than what was before, in any time of the history?"
: If you don't know this, I will illustrate a few things enjoyed by riches.
: 1. Inventing the offshore accounting rules, so basically avoiding paying
: nothing in taxes. The fine example is GE.
: 2. categorizing incomes into different kinds. The kind that the rich gets
|
G*******1
发帖数: 6411 | 29 不错，是这样。
，
【在 b*******h 的大作中提到】
: 这个我也支持。极右派一直不能认清的事实就是美国贫富差距越来越大， 中产阶级日
: 趋破产。难道能说干活赋税的中产阶级越来越懒？极少数富人越来越勤快？到美国来的
: 中国人， 有多少是冲着福利来的？不要说老黑老墨，那么多中国人失业找不到工作，
: 都是因为懒？说这种话有说服力么？
: 你可以说这是黑8无能的结果，但是不要说没有工作的人懒。
: 中产阶级缩小的情况不改变，GOP的BASE就会越来越少。
|
l******g
发帖数: 6771 | 30 I agree with you. We need revenue to balance the budget but don't just
target 2% which is not fair. Marginal tax rate should be raised for all and
burden need to shared so people can make rational choices. Wellfare needs
to be cut, but don't cut it blindly. Protection network for the weak need
to be there but the spirit should be to encourage people to work.
With all that said, it's hard to say raising tax for everyone in current
political atmosphere. I never understand why it's a sin to just say let's
raise the tax to pay the bills. It's just the sad reality.
you
【在 C****n 的大作中提到】
: Let's go back to Clinton era tax rate, I have no problem with that.
: And close loopholes.
: Just don't tell me, I am the only one going back to higher tax rate, and you
: still enjoy lower rate. That's what the top 2% asking for.
|
|
|
C****n
发帖数: 2324 | 31 There is an easy way out： don' t do anything! Then we get the best result.
Fiscal cliff.
We will have short term pain, long term prosperity.
The left don't want that short term pain, that is why they are left in the
first place.
and
needs
【在 l******g 的大作中提到】
: I agree with you. We need revenue to balance the budget but don't just
: target 2% which is not fair. Marginal tax rate should be raised for all and
: burden need to shared so people can make rational choices. Wellfare needs
: to be cut, but don't cut it blindly. Protection network for the weak need
: to be there but the spirit should be to encourage people to work.
: With all that said, it's hard to say raising tax for everyone in current
: political atmosphere. I never understand why it's a sin to just say let's
: raise the tax to pay the bills. It's just the sad reality.
:
: you
|
l******g
发帖数: 6771 | 32 +1
【在 C****n 的大作中提到】
: Of course not!
: We are not talking how both side will do here, are we? I thought we are
: talking about what is the right thing to do here.
|
l******g
发帖数: 6771 | 33 I said before and say it again. I am for the cliff. Let people pay real
price and they will make wise move.
.
【在 C****n 的大作中提到】
: There is an easy way out： don' t do anything! Then we get the best result.
: Fiscal cliff.
: We will have short term pain, long term prosperity.
: The left don't want that short term pain, that is why they are left in the
: first place.
:
: and
: needs
|
t**x
发帖数: 20965 | |
