s********t
发帖数: 4150 | 1 At least not reliable based on my own experience and observation. |
c****i
发帖数: 7933 | 2 如果你是理工科教授就算了，美國大學文科才是重鎮。
【在 s********t 的大作中提到】
: At least not reliable based on my own experience and observation.
|
s********t
发帖数: 4150 | 3 You are probably right.
【在 c****i 的大作中提到】
: 如果你是理工科教授就算了，美國大學文科才是重鎮。
|
f*********g
发帖数: 1637 | 4 就统计意义而言，lz 说的不合事实。
2 楼的概估则有误差。Business, economics 是文科，但是 liberal 的比例要比数理化
生计的低许多。
另一方面，总的说，学校越好，liberal 的比例也越高。不知1，2 楼是哪类学校。 |
s********t
发帖数: 4150 | 5
I don't think so. Business and economics highly emphasize logical and
quantitative thinking. Regardless of the colleges they fall in, they are
much closer to natural sciences than social studies.
【在 f*********g 的大作中提到】
: 就统计意义而言，lz 说的不合事实。
: 2 楼的概估则有误差。Business, economics 是文科，但是 liberal 的比例要比数理化
: 生计的低许多。
: 另一方面，总的说，学校越好，liberal 的比例也越高。不知1，2 楼是哪类学校。
|
f*********g
发帖数: 1637 | 6 So you think Business, economics more like natural science and math? But
natural science and math are much more liberal than Business, economics.
I am talking about statistics research, not any individual institution as
your observation based on your limited personal experience. |
s********t
发帖数: 4150 | 7 I never claimed the statistical reliability of my observation.
【在 f*********g 的大作中提到】
: So you think Business, economics more like natural science and math? But
: natural science and math are much more liberal than Business, economics.
: I am talking about statistics research, not any individual institution as
: your observation based on your limited personal experience.
|
f*********g
发帖数: 1637 | 8 Okay, my wrong impression. |
