l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 April 27, 2012 by Kevin
Via Resouceful Earth we received news of a story on EE New’s Greenwire
reports that the Obama Administration is actively working, one must assume,
to “Keystone” the Pebble Mine project in Alaska under the auspices of the
Clean Water Act.
U.S. EPA is defending its review of large-scale development in Alaska’s
Bristol Bay watershed amid strong concerns from state leaders, including
Attorney General Michael Geraghty.
At issue is the controversial Pebble Limited Partnership’s gold and
copper mine in southwestern Alaska, which could become one of the largest in
the world. Opponents worry the project could hurt tourism and a valuable
salmon fishery.
In a recent letter, Geraghty questioned EPA’s legal authority to
conduct the assessment, since the company has yet to submit permit
applications (Greenwire, April 3).
But in another letter earlier this month, EPA Region 10 Administrator
Dennis McLerran said the Clean Water Act gave him the authority to establish
programs and conduct research for pollution prevention. He also offered the
state an olive branch by agreeing to meet to discuss concerns.
Remember that last month the EPA was roundly smacked down by the Supreme
Court for their fine first, investigate later use of the Clean Water Act.
That rebuke has not dissuaded them from trying to use the Act to shut down
the Pebble project before it has even formally been proposed. More from the
Greenwire article:
Groups, including Alaska Native tribes, have been at odds over EPA
intervention and a possible pre-emptive Clean Water Act permit veto of the
project.
“In order to give due consideration to these conflicting requests,”
McLerran wrote, “the EPA decided to collect and evaluate available
scientific information on Bristol Bay fisheries and their vulnerability to
large-scale mining development.”
With the draft watershed assessment scheduled for release next month and
peer review and public meetings planned in its wake, both opponents and
supporters of the mine have intensified their lobbying efforts.
The Pebble Partnership has touted the attorney general’s letter and
said EPA’s assessment might lead to a veto of the project, which state and
company officials call illegal and unprecedented (Greenwire, Feb. 9). The
agency is not discounting the possibility of such an action.
The Pebble project, like Keystone before it, is just one large example of
the trend under this president. While publically saying that they are
pursuing an “all of the above” energy and resource strategy, down in the
trenches (out of public view for the most part) what is really happening is
that administratively and bureaucratically they are ensuring that “none of
the above” ever see the light of day.
Marita Noon at Townhall shows that Obama’s reelection could well depend on
preemptively shutting down Pebble and other similar projects to appease his
green constituency. The environmentalists want total government control of
all natural resources and want bureaucrats to determine what air, land, and
ocean uses are acceptable.
Yet another thing that is at stake in this election… |
|
