由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - Article On John Edwards Never Once Mentions ‘Democrat'
相关主题
ABC:奥巴马的民主党越来越下三路Do Republicans Ideas Lead to Job Growth?
黑墨的关键:真主党才是racistStalemate in Hill payroll tax fight
Pew Research: Republican 44% Democrat 48% (转载)Not A Team Player
Adelson pours $25 million into White House race民主党总统股市年均+11%,共和党总统股市年均+2.7%
Obama to Dems: Don't 'jam' health care billThose “Evil, Rich People” – are Democrats (ZT)
什么时候出结果?共和党人比民主党人多交62%税.
WSJ:GOP Ends Union StalemateMorning Jay: Why Romney Is Likely to Win
Negotiating with Lunatics90%的美国人口生活在一党控制州长和议会的州, 各州是民主的试验场
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: edwards话题: democrat话题: dellinger话题: john
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
Article On John Edwards Never Once Mentions ‘Democrat,’ But attacks
Republicans Five Times
April 17, 2012 by Warner Todd Huston
Curiously, the same Atlantic article that rightfully points out that the Old
Media was “late to report” on Democrat candidate for President John
Edwards’ extramarital affairs an corruption makes its own strange omission
from the storyline by somehow forgetting to mention even one time that
Edwards was, indeed, a Democrat. Yet five times the piece mentions “
Republicans” in order to lead the reader to question motives and cast
aspersions on the Grand Old Party.
This one can be chalked up to one of our favorite games, the “name that
party” game, where one can read an entire story about a troubled or
criminal politician without once being told that the subject is a Democrat.
In his piece headlined, “Why the John Edwards Trial is a Bigger Deal Than
You Think,” for The Atlantic, blogger Hampton Dellinger goes into detail
about Edwards’ prosecution and tries to tell us what it is all so unusual
about the situation.
But it is strange that Edwards is never fully identified as a former
candidate for the Democrat nomination for President. On the other hand,
Dellinger spares no effort to name Republicans in order, perhaps, to provide
mitigation for Edwards.
While Dellinger never uses the word “Democrat,” he goes for the throat of
any Republican he can connect to the Edwards case, even if tangentially.
First off, Dellinger smacks around Sheldon Adelson and Foster Friess for
spending “tens of millions” in the 2012 Republican presidential primary
due to the left’s most hated Supreme Court decision, Citizens United. Then
he spends a dense paragraph scoffing at “Republican U.S. Attorney General”
George Holding who Dellinger says is trying to make a personal political
career out of his involvement with the Edwards case.
I suppose one might imagine that everyone knows who John Edwards is, but
making such an assumption violates good writing for one thing, especially
when a large portion of the article is used to cast aspersions on the
opposing party.
Further, with all the swipes at Republicans and the subsequent lack of the
word Democrat appearing anywhere at all, one might think that in the little
bio of Dellinger posted on the page The Atlantic might have felt obliged to
let its readers know that Hampton Dellinger is himself a former Democrat
candidate, he a failed candidate for North Carolina Lt. Governor. Were
readers to be made aware of this they might understand why Republicans come
under special scrutiny in a story about a Democrat’s indictment and trial.
As Doug Ross quips, “There really are two Americas: the Democrat-media
elites who think they are our betters, and the rest of us.”
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
90%的美国人口生活在一党控制州长和议会的州, 各州是民主的试验场Obama to Dems: Don't 'jam' health care bill
调查表明工程师更倾向于conservative什么时候出结果?
It’s the President’s FaultWSJ:GOP Ends Union Stalemate
Democrat-run states hike spending 400% faster than GOP statesNegotiating with Lunatics
ABC:奥巴马的民主党越来越下三路Do Republicans Ideas Lead to Job Growth?
黑墨的关键:真主党才是racistStalemate in Hill payroll tax fight
Pew Research: Republican 44% Democrat 48% (转载)Not A Team Player
Adelson pours $25 million into White House race民主党总统股市年均+11%,共和党总统股市年均+2.7%
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: edwards话题: democrat话题: dellinger话题: john