由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - We have a divided government because we have a divided country
相关主题
register asian VS. register radical islamThe time when Glenn Greenwald was finally right
加拿大家庭负债超过美国科学家又发现了你早就知道的事情:男女有别
Angela Davis calls Obama a Black Radical我突然想到一个解决美国失业率居高不下的好办法!
Top Democrat:鼓励穆斯林揭发身边有极端倾向的人关于Jimmy 事件:我们每个人还可以这样做:
Trump, Clinton and the Culture of DeferenceIsrael says 2014 is Dems' year
俄国出了个呕巴马美国人厌倦了裙带资本主义, 美国人起义了 (转载)
深陷债务危机的西班牙失业率达到21.3%捐款给WikiLeaks可抵税
NLRB Butts Out of Boeing’s BusinessRe: 想把自己的面试机会让给黑墨的可以给ACLU捐款 (转载)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: government话题: divided话题: american话题: country话题: because
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
Charlie’s doing us all a favor and explaining simply what’s happening in
DC:
As clearly as any issue you could name, the debate over the US debt ceiling
exposes the radically different governing philosophies held by Democrats and
Republicans.
On the left it is taken as an article of faith that government must
constantly grow and increase its sphere of influence as a counter to the
power of private corporations, and to provide a constantly-growing safety
net for Americans living at the margins.
On the right it is taken as an article of faith that government must
dramatically shrink in order to correct the decades-long diminution of
personal liberty and the strangulation of free enterprise that threatens to
undo all that is best about the American experiment.
At stake are the most cherished and bedrock beliefs of both sides. So how
can there be any compromise? Either government continues to grow and our
national indebtedness increases, a defeat for the right, or government
growth is checked for the first time since the New Deal, a precedent that
would be anathema to the left.
We have a divided government because we have a divided country. Government
isn’t broken; it is merely the most public face of the radical
philosophical differences that can be found in any Main Street café in
America.
If we were debating abortion rights or NAFTA instead of indebtedness, each
side would be equally entrenched, equally unwilling to compromise, because
each side holds a mutually exclusive vision of what American values and
American government should be.
This great legislative battle is exactly how a great debate should happen in
this country, and is the exact consequence of electing representatives who
take to Washington the viewpoints of their states and neighborhoods. The
high stakes and dire consequences should the two sides fail to reach an
agreement is entirely appropriate given the opposite views each side holds
on the fundamental purpose of government.
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
Re: 想把自己的面试机会让给黑墨的可以给ACLU捐款 (转载)Trump, Clinton and the Culture of Deference
尼玛 Trump入侵索马里俄国出了个呕巴马
你说美国这种nc这么多, 搞不坏才怪深陷债务危机的西班牙失业率达到21.3%
"If you are a liberal – as I am – you should be the most offended"NLRB Butts Out of Boeing’s Business
register asian VS. register radical islamThe time when Glenn Greenwald was finally right
加拿大家庭负债超过美国科学家又发现了你早就知道的事情:男女有别
Angela Davis calls Obama a Black Radical我突然想到一个解决美国失业率居高不下的好办法!
Top Democrat:鼓励穆斯林揭发身边有极端倾向的人关于Jimmy 事件:我们每个人还可以这样做:
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: government话题: divided话题: american话题: country话题: because