a******o
发帖数: 16625 | 1 共和党这次太猛了。不过，好玩的是，刚才听交通台，阿诺州长说，他们不要的钱，我
们加州都要了，哈哈。 | m*********e
发帖数: 39 | 2 哪三个？
【在 a******o 的大作中提到】
: 共和党这次太猛了。不过，好玩的是，刚才听交通台，阿诺州长说，他们不要的钱，我
: 们加州都要了，哈哈。
| b*****u
发帖数: 648 | 3 那个貌似是密歇根州长说的。不过啊诺的观点类似
【在 a******o 的大作中提到】
: 共和党这次太猛了。不过，好玩的是，刚才听交通台，阿诺州长说，他们不要的钱，我
: 们加州都要了，哈哈。
| b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 4 有好几个，LA, SC, Missipi, TX.不过好像也不是都不要，是部分要，部分不要
【在 m*********e 的大作中提到】
: 哪三个？
| t*****m
发帖数: 683 | 5 阿挪娶了肯尼迪家族的女人,搞不好是个批着共和党外皮的民主党傀儡 | c***l
发帖数: 2395 | | d********f
发帖数: 43471 | 7 美国的州权就是在一次一次的接受联邦资助中丧失的
【在 c***l 的大作中提到】
: 为什么不要
| g********r
发帖数: 27 | 8 These money is not free money, it is a loan. The states who are taking money
must follow the rules of using the money, like unemployment benefits, if
you take the some money, you will have to start giving unemployment benefits
to part time workers, which might cost more than loan itself. And the most
important thing, the states need to pay the loan back. | A**d
发帖数: 13310 | 9
money
benefits
most
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Are you sure about this? I don't think so. Jindal's argument
was this money would run out in 3 years, yet the unemployment
benefits change would become a permanent law even after that.
【在 g********r 的大作中提到】
: These money is not free money, it is a loan. The states who are taking money
: must follow the rules of using the money, like unemployment benefits, if
: you take the some money, you will have to start giving unemployment benefits
: to part time workers, which might cost more than loan itself. And the most
: important thing, the states need to pay the loan back.
|
|
