c*********p
发帖数: 3217 | 1 据英国每日邮报报道，迈阿密“食脸男”尤金的女友周三下午首次在公共场合曝光。她
继续为男友辩护，称与她相处四个月之久的男友曾经是一位虔诚的基督徒，对社会并无
害处。
27岁的尤万卡·布莱恩特表示，尤金在脱光衣服，对受害者进行残忍攻击前，带着
一本圣经。他本来应该是一个好父亲。 | l*****a
发帖数: 38403 | 2 带着一本圣经？ 圣灵严重附体了？
【在 c*********p 的大作中提到】
: 据英国每日邮报报道，迈阿密“食脸男”尤金的女友周三下午首次在公共场合曝光。她
: 继续为男友辩护，称与她相处四个月之久的男友曾经是一位虔诚的基督徒，对社会并无
: 害处。
: 27岁的尤万卡·布莱恩特表示，尤金在脱光衣服，对受害者进行残忍攻击前，带着
: 一本圣经。他本来应该是一个好父亲。
| s******l
发帖数: 6898 | | J*****3
发帖数: 4298 | 4 每个星期上教会、有宗教经历和有elevated complex partial epileptic like signs
（又是颞叶）的男人，有44% 说他们会以神的名义杀人。
"I would kill in God's name:" role of sex, weekly church attendance, report
of a religious experience, and limbic lability.
Persinger MA.
Source
Department of Psychology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
Data collected during the last 15 years for the Personal Philosophy
Inventory from 1.48 thousand university men (n = 629) and women (n = 853)
were analyzed to discern the response characteristics of individuals who
stated "yes" to Item 136 "If God told me to kill, I would do it in His name.
" The percentage (7%, range between 2% and 8% per year) of affirmative
responses did not change significantly over time. The odds ratio for men:
women for an affirmative response was 1.4:1. As predicted a four-way
interaction for sex, weekly church attendance, history of a religious
experience, and elevated complex partial epileptic-like signs was
statistically significant. Of the men who reported a religious experience,
attended church weekly, and displayed elevated complex partial epileptic
like signs (5.7% of all males), 44% stated they would kill another person if
God told them to do so.
PMID: 9293569 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
http://aoda.laurentian.ca/NR/rdonlyres/DF3F8ED6-DF65-4A51-8393- | t**********4
发帖数: 12 | 5 猥琐女下班了吗？
【在 l*****a 的大作中提到】
: 带着一本圣经？ 圣灵严重附体了？
| i*****t
发帖数: 24265 | 6 曾经见过流浪汉老头手拿圣经和笔记,独自公园高声演讲,旁若无人,此版是否有人类同? | l*****a
发帖数: 38403 | 7 喝高的罪魁
同?
【在 i*****t 的大作中提到】
: 曾经见过流浪汉老头手拿圣经和笔记,独自公园高声演讲,旁若无人,此版是否有人类同?
| s*********a
发帖数: 801 | 8 《自然》文章：科学家发现旧约里的暴力文字纵容人的暴力行为
Nature 446, 114-115 (8 March 2007) | doi:10.1038/446114b; Published online 7
March 2007
Scriptural violence can foster aggression
Heidi Ledford
Elements of religious texts seem to inspire bad behaviour.
There once was a man and his concubine from the Israeli tribe of Ephraim who
were travelling in the land of Benjamin, another Israeli tribe. As the
couple dined in the city of Gibeah, a mob assembled outside and pounded on
the door. The mob captured the concubine, then raped and beat her to death.
The man collected her corpse the next day and travelled home. The other
tribes of Israel were outraged at the crime, assembled an army and razed
several Benjamite cities, killing every man, woman, child and animal they
could.
Around 500 students recently read a version of this story, which is based on
a passage from the Old Testament, as part of a psychological study. For
half of the participants the tale contained an additional passage: when the
man returned home, his tribe prayed to God and asked what they should do.
God commanded the tribe to "take arms against their brothers and chasten
them before the Lord".
After reading the story, the students participated in another exercise
intended to measure aggression. About half of the study participants came
from Brigham Young University, a religious university in Provo, Utah, and
almost all were members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
The other half came from the Free University in Amsterdam. Only 50% of the
Dutch group believed in God and 27% in the Bible. But for both groups —
whether the students were based in the Netherlands or the United States, and
believed in God or not — the trend was the same: those who were told that
God had sanctioned the violence against the Israelite were more likely to
act aggressively in the subsequent exercise.
The study is indicative of a growing interest among psychologists and
sociologists in the origins of religious violence. That subject was taboo
until recently for many psychologists, and past research tended to focus on
the role of religion in psychological healing. But heightening concern about
religious terrorism has pushed negative uses of religion to the forefront.
"People often use God as a justification for committing violent acts," says
Brad Bushman, a social psychologist at the University of Michigan in Ann
Arbor and lead author of the study. "And that just bothers me, I guess."
The results of Bushman's study, to be published in the March issue of
Psychological Science, do not indicate that religious people are more
aggressive than non-religious people (B. J. Bushman et al. Psychol. Sci. 18,
204–207; 2007). Furthermore, the story used was an isolated example of
scriptural violence taken out of context, and thus does not reflect the
experience of reading the Bible as a whole. But it does suggest that
selective exposure to violent passages in a scriptural canon can promote
aggression.
If violence is presented as the authoritative voice of God, it can increase
the possibility of more violence.
That response probably reflects a long-standing finding in psychology that
people respond more aggressively to a depiction of violence that they feel
is justified, says Robert Ridge, a social psychologist at Brigham Young
University and a co-author of the study.
Sociologist Mark Juergensmeyer of the University of California, Santa
Barbara, says his research has also pointed to the motivational power of
scriptural violence, but that the context of the message is key. "If
violence is presented as the authoritative voice of God, it can increase the
possibility of more violence," says Juergensmeyer. "But everything depends
on how it is presented." The same passage placed in a non-threatening,
historical context might not promote aggression, he argues.
God's sanction can be a motivator for aggression.
Nevertheless, when scriptural violence is used to promote hostility, it is
extremely effective, Juergensmeyer adds. Invoking religious justification
allows a political leader to believe in promises of immortality and
spiritual rewards that can be powerful motivators. "Religion is not the
problem," he says. "But it can make a secular problem worse."
People often choose to ignore the violent side to religion, says John Hall,
a sociologist at the University of California, Davis, and they tend to
dismiss those who commit religiously inspired violence as members of the
fringe. "There are built-in cultural lenses that we use to dissociate
religion from violence," he says. "When we see religious movements that are
prophetically inspired and engaged in violence, there's a cultural tendency
to say 'oh, they're not really religious'."
That view represents a misleading, selective interpretation of most
religious canons, agrees theologian Hector Avalos of Iowa State University
in Ames. "People who choose the violent interpretation are no less arbitrary
than those who choose the peaceful one," he says. Avalos has proposed a
radical solution to theologically inspired violence — cut the violent
passages out of the scripture.
It's a wildly controversial idea that ought not to be, he says, because
spiritual leaders effectively do that on a regular basis. "A lot of churches
have a series of passages that they read during the year," says Avalos. "
And usually they don't choose the passages involving genocide." |
| s*********a
发帖数: 801 | 9 南非世界杯出惨案 61岁老汉为看世界杯遭妻子殴毙
体坛网讯 6月18日，南非警方说，该国东北部1名男子因为想看世足赛电视转播而
非宗教节目，结果遭家人殴打致死。
现年61岁的这名男子马科雅住在林坡坡省（Limpopo）马奎亚村（Makweya），13日
为抢夺电视遥控器而与妻子和两名子女打架，因为他要看世界杯赛德国与澳大利亚之战
，而他的妻小则要收看传教节目。
警方发言人马里佛今天描述案发情形说：“马科雅说，‘不行，我要看足球’，当
时争论已出现。”
马里佛说，马科雅抢不到遥控器，乾脆起身以手转台，结果遭到68岁妻子、36岁儿
子和23岁女儿联手攻击。
马里佛说，他不确定这家人如何打死马科雅。他说：“他们似乎将马科雅的头部推
撞墙，直到马科雅受到重伤，才打电话报案，但当警察赶到时，马科雅已丧命。”
案 61岁老汉为看世界杯遭妻子殴毙
A South African man who wanted to watch a World Cup football match instead
of a religious program was beaten to death by his family in the northeastern
part of the country, police said Thursday.
David Makoeya, a 61-year-old man from the small village of Makweya, Limpopo
province, fought with his wife and two children for the remote control on
Sunday because he wanted to watch Germany play Australia in the World Cup.
The others, however, wanted to watch a gospel show. …
“It appears they banged his head against the wall,” Malefo said. “They
phoned the police only after he was badly injured, but by the time the
police arrived the man was already dead.” | s*********a
发帖数: 801 | 10 经常去教堂的男孩杀人，杀人方法也是用圣经中提到的方法---用石头砸死
每日邮报 2011-07-28 15:02:59
一顿早餐，竟然换去一条人命。英国一名 15岁美少女，惨遭 16岁前男友用石头活活砸
死。她万万想不到，这位学业优异的前男友，只是因为与朋友打赌一顿早餐，而亲手将
她杀死。这名冷血少年前日（周三）被判谋杀罪成，法官破例让传媒公开他的姓名和照
片。
陪审团以 10票赞成 2票反对，大比数裁定戴维斯（ Joshua Davies）谋杀罪成，他闻
判时木无表情。法官要等候精神报告再决定刑罚，但预告他很可能会终身监禁。
戴维斯住在威尔斯南部小村庄阿伯肯菲格，逢周日与家人去教堂，学业成绩很好，从
没有人想到，他会做出伤天害理的事。 2009年底，他开始约会住在附近村落的死者艾
尔沃德（ Rebecca Aylward），恋情维持了短短三个月，艾尔沃德就主动与戴维斯分手。
但两人欲断难断，去年 10月戴维斯再次约会艾尔沃德，她非常高兴，母亲索尼娅说：
「当日早上 6时她就起床悉心化妆，穿上之前一天买的新衣服。」戴维斯约她到一个偏
僻丛林会面，艾尔沃德从没想过这是个死亡约会。索尼娅说：「她看到戴维斯下山向她
走过去时，（在电话中的）声音听起来很高兴。」
事实上，戴维斯一直在社交网站 facebook跟朋友说，要设局杀死艾尔沃德，但朋友以
为他只是随便说说。戴维斯每周六早上，都与一群朋友相约吃早餐。案发前数周，他对
一名朋友说︰ 「若我真的杀死她，你会怎样？」朋友开玩笑回答：「我会请你吃早餐
。」案发两天前，戴维斯再向这名朋友说：「你要买早餐给我吃。」但朋友仍不知道事
态严重。
戴维斯在约会期间，用一块榄球般大的石头，猛砸艾尔沃德头部至少六次，把她杀死
。之后带着两个朋友去看尸体，并叫其中一人拉动她的连身衣帽子，看看她是否还活着。
戴维斯对朋友说：「你知道要扭断一个人的颈，是多麽困难吗？当时她背着我，我想
：『是时候了，我要动手。』我尝试扭断她的脖子，她一直尖叫。于是我拿起石头，开
始砸她。最糟糕的是感到和看到她的头颅破裂。」为了製造不在场证据，他后来在 fb
留言说当日在家与朋友看影碟。
艾尔沃德久久未回家，索尼娅报警求助。消息传出后，戴维斯假惺惺地在 fb留言，说
担心艾尔沃德的安危，「为她母亲感到难过」，又说「若我是家长，而女儿失踪，我会
很担心」。
戴维斯原本打算回到凶案现场，把尸体埋起来，然后诬陷其中一个见过尸体的朋友杀
人，可是其中一个朋友，比他早一步报警。
戴维斯未成年，法庭原禁止传媒报道他的姓名或刊登他的照片，但法官琼斯前日判案
时，以公众利益为由取消有关禁令。他说：「这是在一个细小社区发生的罪案，公众有
权知道谁犯了事。」此时戴维斯才哭起来。
艾尔沃德的家人发表声明说，她「是在一个无聊和野蛮的行为中被杀，死于她爱慕和信
任的人手上，我们永远不会原谅戴维斯」。 | J*****3
发帖数: 4298 | |
|
