D*****r
发帖数: 6791 | 1 http://www.religioustolerance.org/spankin3.htm
Christians differ in their reaction to these biblical passages:
Most religious liberals probably feel that these passages merely reflect the
child-raising customs of the age. They note that the verses were written in
a pre-scientific age when child psychology had not developed as a field of
study. Most probably accept that spanking is hazardous to the sexual and
emotional health of children. In their own parenting style, they either
reject corporal punishment entirely as a method of discipline, or adopt it
only in very unusual circumstances. Some would interpret the passages in
Proverbs as accurately reflecting Solomon's parenting style, and the
devastating consequences of corporal punishment on his son. They generally
would not believe that these passages represent God's intent for parents.
They suggest that they represent only Solomon's policies -- techniques which
the Bible later indicates are counter-productive and dangerous. Rather than
promoting corporal punishment, they might interpret the Bible as
recommending against its use.
Robert Ingersoll, a well known 19th century free-thinker, who wrote in
1891 about King Solomon:
"To me it has always been a matter of amazement why civilized people
, living in the century of Darwin and Humboldt, should quote as authority
the words of Solomon, a murderer, an ingrate, an idolater, and a polygamist | b******o
发帖数: 141 | 2 任何问题在基督教内部都有争论 就没有统一意见的时候 | l*****a
发帖数: 38403 | 3 仔细一想还真没办法反驳
【在 b******o 的大作中提到】
: 任何问题在基督教内部都有争论 就没有统一意见的时候
|
|
