s*******o
发帖数: 4896 | 1 对手是一个22/10/1.9的weak tight fish
Merge Network $0.50/$1.00 No Limit Hold'em - 9 players - http://www.handconv
erter.com/hands/1547318
The DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter
SB: $69.48
Hero (BB): $100.00
UTG: $57.73
UTG+1: $73.18
UTG+2: $168.06
MP1: $60.00
MP2: $113.35
CO: $117.00
BTN: $228.97
Pre Flop: ($1.50) Hero is BB with 8h 8s
1 fold, UTG+1 raises to $2.00, 6 folds, Hero calls $1
Flop: ($4.50) 9d 4h 4d (2 players)
Hero checks, UTG+1 bets $4.50, Hero calls $4.50
Turn: ($13.50) Jd (2 players)
Hero checks, UTG+1 checks
River: ($13.50) 7s (2 players)
Hero checks, UTG+1 bets $9.00, Hero raises to $29.00, UTG+1 calls $20 | W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 2 22 10 is not weak tight. He is loose passive.
★ Sent from iPhone App: iReader Mitbbs Lite 7.36 | d*****0
发帖数: 1500 | 3 我怎么咋看咋觉得你被over pair+ 给搞了呢 | H****r
发帖数: 2801 | 4 22 10 难道不是正常的TAG?
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: 22 10 is not weak tight. He is loose passive.
: ★ Sent from iPhone App: iReader Mitbbs Lite 7.36
| s*******o
发帖数: 4896 | 5 10不能aggresive了
摊牌以后我就知道对手不是一个aggressive选手，对range估计错了
【在 H****r 的大作中提到】
: 22 10 难道不是正常的TAG?
| H****r
发帖数: 2801 | 6 怎么看不到对手的牌？
感觉他得牌不小的样子啊？
【在 s*******o 的大作中提到】
: 对手是一个22/10/1.9的weak tight fish
: Merge Network $0.50/$1.00 No Limit Hold'em - 9 players - http://www.handconv
: erter.com/hands/1547318
: The DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter
: SB: $69.48
: Hero (BB): $100.00
: UTG: $57.73
: UTG+1: $73.18
: UTG+2: $168.06
: MP1: $60.00
| s*******o
发帖数: 4896 | 7 你觉得他能有什么牌turn check river call c/r?
【在 H****r 的大作中提到】
: 怎么看不到对手的牌？
: 感觉他得牌不小的样子啊？
| H****r
发帖数: 2801 | 8 气势感觉像 77
【在 s*******o 的大作中提到】
: 你觉得他能有什么牌turn check river call c/r?
| s*******o
发帖数: 4896 | 9 比这小点，是nut flush。。
我最近学到的这条line，对普通weak reg可能很profit
面对bet flop, check turn control pot, bet river的对手，如果能rep大牌
river 有位置就check raise，或者对手不bet river就overbet。
这里看到一个概念叫capped range，对手如果这样check一条街，nut range基本
没有。
从这手讲，感觉如果对tag来讲，flush draw 打了pair flop，应该继续打turn
否则面对994这样的board，float flop的应该会不少
【在 H****r 的大作中提到】
: 气势感觉像 77
| H****r
发帖数: 2801 | 10 整个没看懂，lol
看来偶得学习点poker理论知识了...
【在 s*******o 的大作中提到】
: 比这小点，是nut flush。。
: 我最近学到的这条line，对普通weak reg可能很profit
: 面对bet flop, check turn control pot, bet river的对手，如果能rep大牌
: river 有位置就check raise，或者对手不bet river就overbet。
: 这里看到一个概念叫capped range，对手如果这样check一条街，nut range基本
: 没有。
: 从这手讲，感觉如果对tag来讲，flush draw 打了pair flop，应该继续打turn
: 否则面对994这样的board，float flop的应该会不少
| | | H****r
发帖数: 2801 | 11 这手牌是说88打法有问题吧？
【在 s*******o 的大作中提到】
: 比这小点，是nut flush。。
: 我最近学到的这条line，对普通weak reg可能很profit
: 面对bet flop, check turn control pot, bet river的对手，如果能rep大牌
: river 有位置就check raise，或者对手不bet river就overbet。
: 这里看到一个概念叫capped range，对手如果这样check一条街，nut range基本
: 没有。
: 从这手讲，感觉如果对tag来讲，flush draw 打了pair flop，应该继续打turn
: 否则面对994这样的board，float flop的应该会不少
| s*******o
发帖数: 4896 | 12 我在尝试用这种打法，这flop 88 check call很正常吧
我就想咨询大师们这样的board river bluff的line可行不可行
【在 H****r 的大作中提到】
: 这手牌是说88打法有问题吧？
| H****r
发帖数: 2801 | 13 flop这样的很常见吧，这个river bluff很猛很强大，期待大师们评价，要好的话偶也
学习下哈
【在 s*******o 的大作中提到】
: 我在尝试用这种打法，这flop 88 check call很正常吧
: 我就想咨询大师们这样的board river bluff的line可行不可行
| p****r
发帖数: 9164 | 14 one of major leaks of lots of NL players is that they do not bluff enough on
the river unless they miss their draw. when you make this kind of play,
I think you need to have some knowledge of your opponent and clearly think
you can rep.
【在 H****r 的大作中提到】
: flop这样的很常见吧，这个river bluff很猛很强大，期待大师们评价，要好的话偶也
: 学习下哈
| f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 15 俺就是river上太真诚了。
ed miller说的river shove，对手就是call不了的情况，俺还是做不到，呵呵。
on
,
【在 p****r 的大作中提到】
: one of major leaks of lots of NL players is that they do not bluff enough on
: the river unless they miss their draw. when you make this kind of play,
: I think you need to have some knowledge of your opponent and clearly think
: you can rep.
| s*******o
发帖数: 4896 | 16 恩，今天一个session做了一个river bluff shove
在一个单张straight面上被一个set抓了
最神奇的是他居然在draw heavy的版面check了turn
我觉得有人就是fold不掉一些牌会坐crying call吧
on
,
【在 p****r 的大作中提到】
: one of major leaks of lots of NL players is that they do not bluff enough on
: the river unless they miss their draw. when you make this kind of play,
: I think you need to have some knowledge of your opponent and clearly think
: you can rep.
| p****r
发帖数: 9164 | 17 hehe. study your opponent bofore you make any move,especially river move
【在 f*****g 的大作中提到】
: 俺就是river上太真诚了。
: ed miller说的river shove，对手就是call不了的情况，俺还是做不到，呵呵。
:
: on
: ,
| p****r
发帖数: 9164 | 18 yeah. during xmas time a few years ago, I played with a fish in a live 2-5
no cap game. I was not in the hand. He had a set, but the board had one
card for flush(he did not have flush) and one card straight, on the river
his oppponent shoved with nuts(one card flush), he still called about 1000$
river shove with his set. lol.
【在 s*******o 的大作中提到】
: 恩，今天一个session做了一个river bluff shove
: 在一个单张straight面上被一个set抓了
: 最神奇的是他居然在draw heavy的版面check了turn
: 我觉得有人就是fold不掉一些牌会坐crying call吧
:
: on
: ,
| W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 19 my understanding of on-line full ring game roughly:
TAG is 14 10. LAG is 22 18
weak tight is 14 6, Loose passive is 22 10,
The latter two are your targeted fish especially the loose passive type.
Definitely bluff less to loose passive players and value bet them more.
【在 H****r 的大作中提到】
: 22 10 难道不是正常的TAG?
| f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 20 mine was like 15/9, if i still remember, haha.
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: my understanding of on-line full ring game roughly:
: TAG is 14 10. LAG is 22 18
: weak tight is 14 6, Loose passive is 22 10,
: The latter two are your targeted fish especially the loose passive type.
: Definitely bluff less to loose passive players and value bet them more.
| | | W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 21 This is a good concept to go against good TAG or LAG especially when they
know how to pot control, value bet river thin and more importantly capable
of laying down a losing hand. But vs a 22/10 fish, i think it is sort of a
FPS.
As played, the line itself does not have any problem. If you have a very
good TAG image vs a well played TAG, you might even get a fold from smaller
flush, (but I don't expect them to fold nut flush often since he is even
ahead of your value range). But you are vs a 22/10 weak passive fish, i
think this line is arguable.
In terms of capped range, your described approach is more towards range as
played. If you combined this with their starting hand range, it could be
more effective especially vs nitty player when their starting hand range is
very very narrow. Towards this particular player with wide openning range,
it is not as effective. Especially, when he opens the pot with 2X, there
are a lot of suited Ax, small suited connectors and pocket pairs. And when
he does bet the river with that board, i think the lowest range he has is
probably 4x which is tough to make fold towards a loose passive player. On
the other hand, if a 12/6 opens up ep here, his range is more likely to be
capped with an over pair and hope to bet fold river.
【在 s*******o 的大作中提到】
: 比这小点，是nut flush。。
: 我最近学到的这条line，对普通weak reg可能很profit
: 面对bet flop, check turn control pot, bet river的对手，如果能rep大牌
: river 有位置就check raise，或者对手不bet river就overbet。
: 这里看到一个概念叫capped range，对手如果这样check一条街，nut range基本
: 没有。
: 从这手讲，感觉如果对tag来讲，flush draw 打了pair flop，应该继续打turn
: 否则面对994这样的board，float flop的应该会不少
| H****r
发帖数: 2801 | 22 er, learning ...
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: my understanding of on-line full ring game roughly:
: TAG is 14 10. LAG is 22 18
: weak tight is 14 6, Loose passive is 22 10,
: The latter two are your targeted fish especially the loose passive type.
: Definitely bluff less to loose passive players and value bet them more.
| H****r
发帖数: 2801 | 23 Nice post! Learning...
smaller
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: This is a good concept to go against good TAG or LAG especially when they
: know how to pot control, value bet river thin and more importantly capable
: of laying down a losing hand. But vs a 22/10 fish, i think it is sort of a
: FPS.
: As played, the line itself does not have any problem. If you have a very
: good TAG image vs a well played TAG, you might even get a fold from smaller
: flush, (but I don't expect them to fold nut flush often since he is even
: ahead of your value range). But you are vs a 22/10 weak passive fish, i
: think this line is arguable.
: In terms of capped range, your described approach is more towards range as
| s*******o
发帖数: 4896 | 24 nice!
我现在就有点缺乏分辨人的能力，做一些动作的时候总是担心别人是不是这种
类型的玩家
smaller
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: This is a good concept to go against good TAG or LAG especially when they
: know how to pot control, value bet river thin and more importantly capable
: of laying down a losing hand. But vs a 22/10 fish, i think it is sort of a
: FPS.
: As played, the line itself does not have any problem. If you have a very
: good TAG image vs a well played TAG, you might even get a fold from smaller
: flush, (but I don't expect them to fold nut flush often since he is even
: ahead of your value range). But you are vs a 22/10 weak passive fish, i
: think this line is arguable.
: In terms of capped range, your described approach is more towards range as
| M********g
发帖数: 717 | 25 Best post in a while.
smaller
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: This is a good concept to go against good TAG or LAG especially when they
: know how to pot control, value bet river thin and more importantly capable
: of laying down a losing hand. But vs a 22/10 fish, i think it is sort of a
: FPS.
: As played, the line itself does not have any problem. If you have a very
: good TAG image vs a well played TAG, you might even get a fold from smaller
: flush, (but I don't expect them to fold nut flush often since he is even
: ahead of your value range). But you are vs a 22/10 weak passive fish, i
: think this line is arguable.
: In terms of capped range, your described approach is more towards range as
| p****r
发帖数: 9164 | 26 it seems these NL100 rush players were way better than these NL 400 rush
players.
back then, I played 12/8/4.3 , still could get tons of action with my AA, KK
from QQ , AK etc. Lots of time my flopped set etc can get paid very often
from overpair/ tptk etc.
I almost never took these line during my 250k hand rush play.
smaller
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: This is a good concept to go against good TAG or LAG especially when they
: know how to pot control, value bet river thin and more importantly capable
: of laying down a losing hand. But vs a 22/10 fish, i think it is sort of a
: FPS.
: As played, the line itself does not have any problem. If you have a very
: good TAG image vs a well played TAG, you might even get a fold from smaller
: flush, (but I don't expect them to fold nut flush often since he is even
: ahead of your value range). But you are vs a 22/10 weak passive fish, i
: think this line is arguable.
: In terms of capped range, your described approach is more towards range as
| W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 27 rush is a weird creature. You can hide behind your nit stats, wait for action from fish or people on tilt and still make a decent profit. I still remember you posted on that rush reg thread from ssnl forum and one of the best NL400 regs i know of made fun of your nit image (2+2 id Gary Neville? i think he is from HongKong).. I thought that was really funny.. lol. Really can't expect you get any action from the good regs from NL400. but hey, there is nothing wrong with that. Our majority of profit should come from fish anyway.
I really miss reading that thread. there are some really good players there and some really funny guys.
rush
KK
【在 p****r 的大作中提到】
: it seems these NL100 rush players were way better than these NL 400 rush
: players.
: back then, I played 12/8/4.3 , still could get tons of action with my AA, KK
: from QQ , AK etc. Lots of time my flopped set etc can get paid very often
: from overpair/ tptk etc.
: I almost never took these line during my 250k hand rush play.
:
:
: smaller
| p****r
发帖数: 9164 | 28 u mean imglated something? he is from Hong Kong, living in U.S then.
he is ok reg, but I do not think he is really good.A little bit over loose.
Most of these NL 400 rush regs are semi decent, but I did not see
many very good players there. A few redline pro regs are pretty good
though.
that is the nature of rush. . A lot of NL400 rush reg are NL 5-10 or NL
10-20 reg, some are even 10-25NL regs. Most of them were 6 max players and
they played a little big over aggressive for FR, many regs still like to
always stack in preflop with AK for 100BB, regardless opponent. It is good
strategy in 6max ,but not necessary good in FR.
Back then I was brand new to online cash game. I basically never play
online FR cash game before I started NL 400 rush. I played a lot of live
cash game before. But I think lots of my line are behind to these good
online cash game regs. So it is a learning game for me. All my online game
were HUSNG where LAG is the only winning style. Very different game. To be
honest, for the first 100K hand, I barely use HUD, still get 3.6 BB /100h
winning. I just wrote a lots notes for these regs. But I did not have a
single very tilting session for the first 100K hand. And guess I was just
lucky.
action from fish or people on tilt and still make a decent profit. I still
remember you posted on that rush reg thread from ssnl forum and one of the
best NL400 regs i know of made fun of your nit image (2+2 id Gary Neville? i
think he is from HongKong).. I thought that was really funny.. lol. Really
can't expect you get any action from the good regs from NL400. but hey,
there is nothing wrong with that. Our majority of p: rofit should come from
fish anyway.
there and some really funny guys.
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: rush is a weird creature. You can hide behind your nit stats, wait for action from fish or people on tilt and still make a decent profit. I still remember you posted on that rush reg thread from ssnl forum and one of the best NL400 regs i know of made fun of your nit image (2+2 id Gary Neville? i think he is from HongKong).. I thought that was really funny.. lol. Really can't expect you get any action from the good regs from NL400. but hey, there is nothing wrong with that. Our majority of profit should come from fish anyway.
: I really miss reading that thread. there are some really good players there and some really funny guys.
:
: rush
: KK
| W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 29 I think your record at NL400 rush is very good. The preflop leak you
mentioned is definitely there and rush gives you a chance to exploit that
much more frequent. You probably also have a very good and balanced steal
resteal strategy at late position with your experience in HUSNG, along with
the few big preflop leaks you can exploit. I am not surprised that you can
make a good profit.
The nature of Holdem game has decided that for full ring game, peoplep plays
a tighter game has an edge post flop. so there is nothing wrong with
playing tight especially in rush when table dynamic is not as significant as
regular table. I play very tight myself too. But I think we need to give
some respect to people who do play loose and make a killing profit. This guy
's ftp id is iamalagtad. From some of his screen shot of his HUD stats
shown on 2+2, he plays 22 18 and 4 table NL400 + 2 or 4 NL200 tables. I
think he deserves some more respect than "he is ok, a bit over loose". When
I see you 2 table NL400 with 12 8, I can see how you can exploit your edge
and profits. When I see his stats, my reaction is "how the fuck does he win
playing like that?" And that speaks for itself.
loose.
and
【在 p****r 的大作中提到】
: u mean imglated something? he is from Hong Kong, living in U.S then.
: he is ok reg, but I do not think he is really good.A little bit over loose.
: Most of these NL 400 rush regs are semi decent, but I did not see
: many very good players there. A few redline pro regs are pretty good
: though.
:
:
: that is the nature of rush. . A lot of NL400 rush reg are NL 5-10 or NL
: 10-20 reg, some are even 10-25NL regs. Most of them were 6 max players and
: they played a little big over aggressive for FR, many regs still like to
| p****r
发帖数: 9164 | 30 thanks for the compliment. I think I still have a lot of leaks for online
cash game(live game as well ). For preflop, I think my major leak is not 3
betting enough and not balance my 3 betting range well. Should add a lot
more SC in my 3 betting range.
I only played 3 all in big pots with iamalagtad with so many hands
playing together. Like to hear what you guys think
First pot just hands played itself. EP opened to 12 , iamalagtad raised
to 36 MP, I was at SB with AA, 4 bet to around 100, Ep folded , he snap
shoved , showing KK. My AA held up.
Second one was kind of sick one and I played horrible as well. I raised
QQ UTG to 12 , he is the only caller. Flop comes K Q blank rainbow. I led
out about the half the pot, he made a strong raise to 60 something. . I
think there are lots of total airball in his range and wanted him continue
his story, so just flatted. Turn is blank(under 9), I checked, and planed to
got in on the turn. But he checked too. River is a T, I bet near the pot,
he shoved. I kind of felt I was beat, but too committed to the pot and made
the crying call. He had AJ, river the nuts.
Third one, I put money in bad shape but got lucky. But I still like my
line. We were about 460$ effective. Everybody folded to him on the button,
he raised to 12. I checked his stat, he pretty much opened any two if nobody
was in. I had Ah8h at BB, usually I folded to a raise OOP, but againt his range I
think Ah8h played Ok. I hate to 3 bet it and have to fold after being 4
bet.So I just called 8$ more out of BB.
Flop came KhQh2d. I led out with nuts flush draw, he made a strong
raise, I shoved. He showed KcQc, for top two. But I hit a heart on the turn
and took down the pot.
with
plays
as
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: I think your record at NL400 rush is very good. The preflop leak you
: mentioned is definitely there and rush gives you a chance to exploit that
: much more frequent. You probably also have a very good and balanced steal
: resteal strategy at late position with your experience in HUSNG, along with
: the few big preflop leaks you can exploit. I am not surprised that you can
: make a good profit.
: The nature of Holdem game has decided that for full ring game, peoplep plays
: a tighter game has an edge post flop. so there is nothing wrong with
: playing tight especially in rush when table dynamic is not as significant as
: regular table. I play very tight myself too. But I think we need to give
| | | H****r
发帖数: 2801 | 31 Player V5
raised
raised
【在 p****r 的大作中提到】
: thanks for the compliment. I think I still have a lot of leaks for online
: cash game(live game as well ). For preflop, I think my major leak is not 3
: betting enough and not balance my 3 betting range well. Should add a lot
: more SC in my 3 betting range.
: I only played 3 all in big pots with iamalagtad with so many hands
: playing together. Like to hear what you guys think
: First pot just hands played itself. EP opened to 12 , iamalagtad raised
: to 36 MP, I was at SB with AA, 4 bet to around 100, Ep folded , he snap
: shoved , showing KK. My AA held up.
: Second one was kind of sick one and I played horrible as well. I raised
| W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 32 您老在lv 打混那么多年,职业了也那么久, poker 肯定是有特长的, 你平时的帖基本也是靠谱的. 那怕就是认识到rush 打得紧点就是先天优势, 能keep自己的ego in check 来exploit那个edge 也是很不错的, 也不是一件很容易的事.
不过你帖这几手牌有十么意思呢? 就想说明你打得比他好? 你的ego, 也真不小的.
咱们把话说白了吧, 您也别生气. 他能打22 18 6-8桌NL400 and NL200 rush and make a profit, 只要他愿意, 他基本肯定可以打两桌NL400 12/8 打到你的赢率, 而你未必可以打6桌rush 用22/18的数据来盈利. 他能这样来打, 是因为他对NL 400的其他对手可以exploit 的edge 比你多.. 就这样...
raised
raised
【在 p****r 的大作中提到】
: thanks for the compliment. I think I still have a lot of leaks for online
: cash game(live game as well ). For preflop, I think my major leak is not 3
: betting enough and not balance my 3 betting range well. Should add a lot
: more SC in my 3 betting range.
: I only played 3 all in big pots with iamalagtad with so many hands
: playing together. Like to hear what you guys think
: First pot just hands played itself. EP opened to 12 , iamalagtad raised
: to 36 MP, I was at SB with AA, 4 bet to around 100, Ep folded , he snap
: shoved , showing KK. My AA held up.
: Second one was kind of sick one and I played horrible as well. I raised
| p****r
发帖数: 9164 | 33 i mean i made mistake in second hand. ... shove with flush draw is questionable too.
也是靠谱的. 那怕就是认识到rush 打得紧点就是先天优势, 能keep自己的ego in
check 来exploit那个edge 也是很不错的, 也不是一件很容易的事.
make a profit, 只要他愿意, 他基本肯定可以打两桌NL400 12/8 打到你的赢率, 而你
未必可以打6桌rush 用22/18的数据来盈利. 他能这样来打, 是因为他对NL 400的其他
对手可以exploit 的edge 比你多.. 就这样...
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: 您老在lv 打混那么多年,职业了也那么久, poker 肯定是有特长的, 你平时的帖基本也是靠谱的. 那怕就是认识到rush 打得紧点就是先天优势, 能keep自己的ego in check 来exploit那个edge 也是很不错的, 也不是一件很容易的事.
: 不过你帖这几手牌有十么意思呢? 就想说明你打得比他好? 你的ego, 也真不小的.
: 咱们把话说白了吧, 您也别生气. 他能打22 18 6-8桌NL400 and NL200 rush and make a profit, 只要他愿意, 他基本肯定可以打两桌NL400 12/8 打到你的赢率, 而你未必可以打6桌rush 用22/18的数据来盈利. 他能这样来打, 是因为他对NL 400的其他对手可以exploit 的edge 比你多.. 就这样...
:
: raised
: raised
| W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 34 不过仔细看看这3 把牌,第一把是cooler, 没意义, 其他两吧post flop他对牌局还是很
有control的. 我当时有意看了下他的post flop aggression 也就2.2, 不是很高, 说
明他preflop 虽然LAG, post flop 的aggression 还是非常selective 的. 他打22/18,
没有和你很多大锅, all in 也都是他领先, 本身也说明他对你的image 是很注意的.
raised
raised
【在 p****r 的大作中提到】
: thanks for the compliment. I think I still have a lot of leaks for online
: cash game(live game as well ). For preflop, I think my major leak is not 3
: betting enough and not balance my 3 betting range well. Should add a lot
: more SC in my 3 betting range.
: I only played 3 all in big pots with iamalagtad with so many hands
: playing together. Like to hear what you guys think
: First pot just hands played itself. EP opened to 12 , iamalagtad raised
: to 36 MP, I was at SB with AA, 4 bet to around 100, Ep folded , he snap
: shoved , showing KK. My AA held up.
: Second one was kind of sick one and I played horrible as well. I raised
| W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 35 这个是大实话了..赞一个..
questionable too.
【在 p****r 的大作中提到】
: i mean i made mistake in second hand. ... shove with flush draw is questionable too.
:
: 也是靠谱的. 那怕就是认识到rush 打得紧点就是先天优势, 能keep自己的ego in
: check 来exploit那个edge 也是很不错的, 也不是一件很容易的事.
: make a profit, 只要他愿意, 他基本肯定可以打两桌NL400 12/8 打到你的赢率, 而你
: 未必可以打6桌rush 用22/18的数据来盈利. 他能这样来打, 是因为他对NL 400的其他
: 对手可以exploit 的edge 比你多.. 就这样...
| p****r
发帖数: 9164 | 36 我没有想和他比较的意思，我的FR online cash 也就是 入门水平。 就是把同这个你
觉得不错 reg 打的牌讲一下，听听大家意见。 我online cash 打得的确很一般，所以
才打很弱。这两首牌打得都不怎么样， 那个set Q 输了一个大pot. 也就更没有SO 的
意思。我觉得你想多了。
18,
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: 不过仔细看看这3 把牌,第一把是cooler, 没意义, 其他两吧post flop他对牌局还是很
: 有control的. 我当时有意看了下他的post flop aggression 也就2.2, 不是很高, 说
: 明他preflop 虽然LAG, post flop 的aggression 还是非常selective 的. 他打22/18,
: 没有和你很多大锅, all in 也都是他领先, 本身也说明他对你的image 是很注意的.
:
: raised
: raised
|
|
