f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | | W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 2 Why this score does not minus buy-ins? that doesn't seem right | f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 3 you mean "pure profit"? why is it better?
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: Why this score does not minus buy-ins? that doesn't seem right
| W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 4 The way it is currently calculated, the more you join the game, the better
score you will get. Because you are not getting penalized by not making it to the money. If minus the buy-ins, then it is your true profit. For
the first day, the top 3 will have these scores -5.50, and everyone else
that joined will get -5.50. The knocked out bounty can be ignored if it is
too much trouble to calculate.
by the way, i will try to make it to the game from next week. | f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 5 true, lol, although i ranked #2 overall last year, actually i was under
water, haha, since i played almost every event...
but it's kind of discouraging to list everyone (with negative results) and
substract $4.5 (if not include bounty) from winners. take last year as an
example, i doubt anyone would have a positive number > $50 in total, hehe.
yeah, it's simple but not a good way to rank.
to the money. If minus the buy-ins, then it is your true profit. For
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: The way it is currently calculated, the more you join the game, the better
: score you will get. Because you are not getting penalized by not making it to the money. If minus the buy-ins, then it is your true profit. For
: the first day, the top 3 will have these scores -5.50, and everyone else
: that joined will get -5.50. The knocked out bounty can be ignored if it is
: too much trouble to calculate.
: by the way, i will try to make it to the game from next week.
| W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 6 it is not discouraging at all to me to list negative value. If it is for
some people then you can easily balance that by adding some contant to
everyone on the list to make the last place 0 instead of negative. This way
at least the rank reflects the truth a little than the current rank which is
completely bogus.. lol | f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 7 en, maybe not at all, let's try the "profit" approach as you suggest since
it's still early/easy to correct this year's data, lol.
will update after this week's game.
way
is
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: it is not discouraging at all to me to list negative value. If it is for
: some people then you can easily balance that by adding some contant to
: everyone on the list to make the last place 0 instead of negative. This way
: at least the rank reflects the truth a little than the current rank which is
: completely bogus.. lol
| c**********l
发帖数: 606 | 8 i would prefer the ambience to be more friendly, not too blatantly
competitive. it's "forfun" after all.
the old system encourages more plays, which helps grow the community. i
would vote for no change, but well, doesn't really matter. |
|
