l**********t 发帖数: 269 | 1 感觉这牌越来越难打。
Full Tilt Poker Game #14617190923: Table Christopher - $0.05/$0.10 - No
Limit Hold'em - 23:02:26 ET - 2009/09/10
Seat 1: 1moody gurl ($7.42)
Seat 2: Vansh ($13.44)
Seat 3: helloitsme58 ($5.91), is sitting out
Seat 4: pfhcky9 ($7.57)
Seat 5: lilysillycat ($10)
Seat 6: tinchoOmega ($2)
Seat 7: reypme ($4.94)
Seat 8: poker_street ($1.24)
Seat 9: yinyins ($2)
pfhcky9 posts the small blind of $0.05
lilysillycat posts the big blind of $0.10
The button is in seat #2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt |
w***w 发帖数: 6301 | |
p********a 发帖数: 6437 | 3 why difficult, u just want to re-raise, right? that's why it is difficult.
so call is easy and must.
Q's possibility is very small, although this guy represents well.
so what finally he is holding? |
l**********t 发帖数: 269 | 4 as it is a limped pot so I dont think he will ever have QQ here. so what
do you think he was calling my flop and turn bets with?
my gut feeling is that he has a Q. call is simple and doesn't require much
thought but I have just started to learn hand ranges and reading people and
I would like to develop a keen sense of hand reading.
the easy way out is simply call. the difficult part is that I want to rely
on my reads and fold. I wont reraise this pot.
【在 p********a 的大作中提到】 : why difficult, u just want to re-raise, right? that's why it is difficult. : so call is easy and must. : Q's possibility is very small, although this guy represents well. : so what finally he is holding?
|
w***h 发帖数: 24 | 5 我觉得fold是对的,因为考虑到对方为啥最后来了6 raise,很有可能是之前一直怕lz
也有Q,自己kicker小,最后来了6,没有了kicker的问题,所以就raise了。
如果不是这样,很难想像对方为何要raise lz。可能他有10,一直不相信lz有Q,最后
lz check了,证明没有Q,那他最好的选择是跟着check,不会raise。因为这样最保险。
综上,lz唯一赢的机会是对方头脑发热,看见lz示弱就raise吓人,之前call了lz两次
为了等顺子或者同花。这个可能性太小了。 |
l**********t 发帖数: 269 | 6 I called. not really trusting my own read yet. He showed Q7 suited.
now you mentioned it, it indeed is possible although not likely that he was
bluffing on the river with a missed flush/staight draw.
lz
险。
【在 w***h 的大作中提到】 : 我觉得fold是对的,因为考虑到对方为啥最后来了6 raise,很有可能是之前一直怕lz : 也有Q,自己kicker小,最后来了6,没有了kicker的问题,所以就raise了。 : 如果不是这样,很难想像对方为何要raise lz。可能他有10,一直不相信lz有Q,最后 : lz check了,证明没有Q,那他最好的选择是跟着check,不会raise。因为这样最保险。 : 综上,lz唯一赢的机会是对方头脑发热,看见lz示弱就raise吓人,之前call了lz两次 : 为了等顺子或者同花。这个可能性太小了。
|
f*****g 发帖数: 15860 | 7 这种2 paired board的full house最不值得了,类似的还有三张一样的,剩下两张你有
那个小的,或者一个小对,都不值得玩,基本上你只能beat纯bluff。
这种别想着还是个full house,其实纯粹垃圾牌。唯一偶尔可能跟的情况,只能是你想
了解这个人的风格,看看他从头到尾的思路。
was
【在 l**********t 的大作中提到】 : I called. not really trusting my own read yet. He showed Q7 suited. : now you mentioned it, it indeed is possible although not likely that he was : bluffing on the river with a missed flush/staight draw. : : lz : 险。
|