c****1
发帖数: 5654 | 1 his style is dying, i thought only those players who like and play
his style would like to get his racket...
i only played one serve and volley player before, he is 4.0 player
but uses a Prince O3.. |
a*****0
发帖数: 6788 | 2 got to allow people to dream and fantasize. LOL |
a****n
发帖数: 4734 | |
c****1
发帖数: 5654 | 4 i saw a lot of guys using a racket who is a lot higher level
than their real levels are. |
c****1
发帖数: 5654 | 5 it is not like:
the higher level the racket u use, the better you will play.. |
c****1
发帖数: 5654 | 6 the key is trying to find the racket which matches ur game best. |
c****1
发帖数: 5654 | 7 whenever i see someone 3.5 or 4.0 level, playing a racket who needs
a guy at least 5.0 or 5.5, i would laugh... |
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 8 There is no racket that "needs a guy at least 5.0 or 5.5".
Even 1.0 can use a pro racket. No racket is as heavy as 1 lb
and every normal human has the strength to swing a 1 lb racket.
I can also guarantee you a 3.0 player using a so-called 5.0/5.5
racket can beat any 2.0 player, no matter what racket that 2.0
uses.
【在 c****1 的大作中提到】
: whenever i see someone 3.5 or 4.0 level, playing a racket who needs
: a guy at least 5.0 or 5.5, i would laugh...
|
b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 9 Good point.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: There is no racket that "needs a guy at least 5.0 or 5.5".
: Even 1.0 can use a pro racket. No racket is as heavy as 1 lb
: and every normal human has the strength to swing a 1 lb racket.
: I can also guarantee you a 3.0 player using a so-called 5.0/5.5
: racket can beat any 2.0 player, no matter what racket that 2.0
: uses.
|
c****1
发帖数: 5654 | 10
if a 3.5 guy using a pro racket to play a 3.5 guy, he would have
less chance to win since he could not control the racket well..
obviously he would miss more shots than he supposed to.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: There is no racket that "needs a guy at least 5.0 or 5.5".
: Even 1.0 can use a pro racket. No racket is as heavy as 1 lb
: and every normal human has the strength to swing a 1 lb racket.
: I can also guarantee you a 3.0 player using a so-called 5.0/5.5
: racket can beat any 2.0 player, no matter what racket that 2.0
: uses.
|
|
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 11 That could be true. So what you really meant was "only 5.0/5.5
can release the full potential of some rackets".
【在 c****1 的大作中提到】
:
: if a 3.5 guy using a pro racket to play a 3.5 guy, he would have
: less chance to win since he could not control the racket well..
: obviously he would miss more shots than he supposed to.
|
c****1
发帖数: 5654 | 12
true, just a lot of guys spend so much $$ on rackets before their
levels are far away from controling those rackets.
if i say: 85 sq inches rackets are not good for anyone below 4.5
does it make sense?
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: That could be true. So what you really meant was "only 5.0/5.5
: can release the full potential of some rackets".
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 13 It doesn't make 100% sense because there are exceptions.
For me, a 85 sq. in. racket works much better than a 110
racket when playing with a lower level opponent. The low power
is what I need in that situation to avoid unforced errors.
I am a 3.0 player.
It basically depends on the player's style. I don't deny the
possibility that for best performance, most people should go with
oversize racket and play pusher -- it will get you the furthest.
(Doesn't work for me though, who needs to finish the match quickly.)
【在 c****1 的大作中提到】
:
: true, just a lot of guys spend so much $$ on rackets before their
: levels are far away from controling those rackets.
: if i say: 85 sq inches rackets are not good for anyone below 4.5
: does it make sense?
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 14 man, the whole point is trying to b4 the one like me, who is very eager to
get a 神拍!
Just think about the time when the wood racket only existed, what did those
< 4.5 guys and gals used?? @_@
【在 c****1 的大作中提到】
:
: true, just a lot of guys spend so much $$ on rackets before their
: levels are far away from controling those rackets.
: if i say: 85 sq inches rackets are not good for anyone below 4.5
: does it make sense?
|
w******n
发帖数: 13172 | |
K*******6
发帖数: 74 | 16 Do you know there is such thing called paint job?
Plus, the pros need to get their bread and butter from sponsors.
【在 w******n 的大作中提到】
: 老桑自己都不用他们了。人现在用Babolat
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 17 Sampras probably is indeed using the Babolat Pure Storm Tour 98 now,
because there is no way to painjob a PS6.0 to 16x20 string pattern.
【在 K*******6 的大作中提到】
: Do you know there is such thing called paint job?
: Plus, the pros need to get their bread and butter from sponsors.
|
w******n
发帖数: 13172 | 18 然也。偶还试用过这把拍子，确实不错。偶过两年打不动偶的blx90了就也换这把。
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Sampras probably is indeed using the Babolat Pure Storm Tour 98 now,
: because there is no way to painjob a PS6.0 to 16x20 string pattern.
|
f*****n
发帖数: 18176 | 19 when i see someone believe that there are x.x's raq for x.x people, I will
laugh.
the swing weight difference is so small when comparing the so called 5.0 raq
to 3.0 raq.even the difference between players' arms is bigger than that.
what the manufactures want is that we all buy many different raq in
different models. haha.
【在 c****1 的大作中提到】
: whenever i see someone 3.5 or 4.0 level, playing a racket who needs
: a guy at least 5.0 or 5.5, i would laugh...
|
