n*********4
发帖数: 83 | 1 Guys, it was a great match. if the highlights did not convinced you. take a
look at these.
Roger played a bad 4th set tie-breaker, but both guys were still playing
great tennis even deep into the 5th set.
Pete had a great chance to break in the 9th game, that would have given him
the match.
This is true high quality stuff. The way young Roger was playing, Pete must
have felt like looking himself in the mirror.
Enjoy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7x0iWKpzP8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6H0GL | L***z
发帖数: 454 | 2 Thanks for sharing! That's very nice.
I really like Sampras' serve motion--looks very stylish and powerful. I
think that's the only thing that Roger is not so good as Sampras. (However,
Roger's serve in the 2006 Wimbledon final has also been very, very good--but
he could not keep it on a consistent basis)
I believe if Sampras is on top of his game, he could push Federer--he does
not seem to be affected by his opponent--he will always attack by going to
the net. Hence, unlike most current pros (w | n*********4
发帖数: 83 | 3 Pete's serve is really one of all time best. I think that is one area he is
definitely better than Roger.( not that Roger has a bad serve) Especially on
second serve, Pete is really the best. Pete's knee bends is the lowest I
have ever seen.(tried it myself, totally screw up the timing) He also has an
unique ball toss, his left hand does not toss the ball straight up,instead,
it goes up from his right thigh area, this gives him a bigger shoulder turn
, and also this toss has a little curve, and
【在 L***z 的大作中提到】
: Thanks for sharing! That's very nice.
: I really like Sampras' serve motion--looks very stylish and powerful. I
: think that's the only thing that Roger is not so good as Sampras. (However,
: Roger's serve in the 2006 Wimbledon final has also been very, very good--but
: he could not keep it on a consistent basis)
: I believe if Sampras is on top of his game, he could push Federer--he does
: not seem to be affected by his opponent--he will always attack by going to
: the net. Hence, unlike most current pros (w
|
|
