S*****a
发帖数: 700 | 1 纳达尔和罗迪克打球力量大容易理解,可以看出他们使出了全力。但看费德勒打球不费
什么劲儿，但球速，特别是正手击球好象不比大力球手一点儿都不慢。记得看过一片文
章谈过费徳勒的拍子的什么参数和现役球手都不同，所以能做到这一点儿。但不明白为
什么其他人不能用同样的拍子？是因为有专利因素吗？ | o***a
发帖数: 42 | 2 对，我用n90，不过是320克那个版本，发现当大引拍大转体时，没有什么特别不对的地
方，但是，当像ff那样小引拍，快速拍头速度时，感到相当的力不从心；因为，自己身
高170，力量不是相当足，在小引拍时短时间内达不到ff那样的拍头速度；
不过，ff更难摹仿的是，大引拍高点大弧度包球进攻，这个对我来说，简直就是天人下
凡，哈哈
不费
片文
白为 | A*f
发帖数: 3067 | 3 i just switched to nCode 95, (roger's is nCode 90), i was about to write a
post and gave my own verdict of that racket.
but one thing about that racket: you only know how great roger federer is
after you use that racket. It is a very challenge racket. it demands alot
from player. once you prepare well, swing well, you might get the perfect
spot, you would end up with a perfect shot. otherwise, it would only magnify
your mistake, make every not-so-perfect shot into unforce error.
【在 S*****a 的大作中提到】
: 纳达尔和罗迪克打球力量大容易理解,可以看出他们使出了全力。但看费德勒打球不费
: 什么劲儿，但球速，特别是正手击球好象不比大力球手一点儿都不慢。记得看过一片文
: 章谈过费徳勒的拍子的什么参数和现役球手都不同，所以能做到这一点儿。但不明白为
: 什么其他人不能用同样的拍子？是因为有专利因素吗？
| y*y
发帖数: 427 | 4 95 is much more forgiving than 90 :p
FF's 90 is pretty much the stock 90 with different drill.
90 has a 17mm beam. Its feeling is much similar to PS original 85 and PS Rok
93 but more spin friendly and more powerful.
I could be wrong, but I think FF started with PS 85, then briefly used ROK(
or just a PS85 with ROK paintjob) and then really switched to 90. Somehow
such switch comes along with his change of ranking and play style. |
|
