z**5
发帖数: 221 | 1 我们是permanent residents, married filing jointly. 孩子美国出生，
算citizen。 2009年上半年，把孩子送回国内寄养，当然生活费是由我们出。刚刚研究了
一下1040 instructions，发现孩子不能算qualifying child，因为最后一
条“who lived with you for more than half of 2009”不满足。但
是，qualifying dependent没有这个要求，只要“you provided over half
of his support”就可以，所以全部满足了条件。请各位大牛看一下，这样填应该
没问题吧？谢谢！ | b*******g
发帖数: 531 | 2 No problem.
1.A qualified child must be a U.S.citizen or a resident.
2.Even if your child is not a U.S. citizen,he or she
can be your "qualified relative", still enjoys dependency
and exemption. | i******e
发帖数: 1811 | 3 是不是就是不能要 1000刀的CHILD CREDIT,
但是可以算作DEPENDENT的豁免，对吗？
究了
【在 z**5 的大作中提到】
: 我们是permanent residents, married filing jointly. 孩子美国出生，
: 算citizen。 2009年上半年，把孩子送回国内寄养，当然生活费是由我们出。刚刚研究了
: 一下1040 instructions，发现孩子不能算qualifying child，因为最后一
: 条“who lived with you for more than half of 2009”不满足。但
: 是，qualifying dependent没有这个要求，只要“you provided over half
: of his support”就可以，所以全部满足了条件。请各位大牛看一下，这样填应该
: 没问题吧？谢谢！
| d**u
发帖数: 537 | 4 I think it is no problem, you can claim the credit.
because there are exception for counting the days of living with you.
the exceptions include the days that they are traveling. Becially, your kids
are travelling in china, and you still support them.
just my two cents.
究了
【在 z**5 的大作中提到】
: 我们是permanent residents, married filing jointly. 孩子美国出生，
: 算citizen。 2009年上半年，把孩子送回国内寄养，当然生活费是由我们出。刚刚研究了
: 一下1040 instructions，发现孩子不能算qualifying child，因为最后一
: 条“who lived with you for more than half of 2009”不满足。但
: 是，qualifying dependent没有这个要求，只要“you provided over half
: of his support”就可以，所以全部满足了条件。请各位大牛看一下，这样填应该
: 没问题吧？谢谢！
|
|
