W****N
发帖数: 299 | 1 是不是干脆就用standard算了,要不以后包税和弄州税的时候也挺麻烦的.我总感觉
standard deduction最省事,是不是这样? 那位明白的指点一下,多谢! |
c*******A
发帖数: 174 | 2 不觉得。standard deduction 如果你有capital gain/loss,还是一样要填schedule D
。 interest income > 1500, 还是一样要填schedule B。
你都知道itemized deduction比standard deduction多300块钱，说明schedule A已经
填完了，好像州税没有再多的表要填。 |
W****N
发帖数: 299 | 3 这个capital gain/lost是不是一般指股市投资? mutual fund的损失算不算? 我的
interest income<1500所以不用schedule B了
D
【在 c*******A 的大作中提到】
: 不觉得。standard deduction 如果你有capital gain/loss,还是一样要填schedule D
: 。 interest income > 1500, 还是一样要填schedule B。
: 你都知道itemized deduction比standard deduction多300块钱，说明schedule A已经
: 填完了，好像州税没有再多的表要填。
|
t***s
发帖数: 4666 | 4 will you get a state tax refund of >$300? if yes, use standard deduction,
if not, use itemized. a penny is a penny.
【在 W****N 的大作中提到】
: 是不是干脆就用standard算了,要不以后包税和弄州税的时候也挺麻烦的.我总感觉
: standard deduction最省事,是不是这样? 那位明白的指点一下,多谢!
|
W****N
发帖数: 299 | 5 yes, my state tax refund is >$300. but why? 能不能展开讲讲?非常感谢!
【在 t***s 的大作中提到】
: will you get a state tax refund of >$300? if yes, use standard deduction,
: if not, use itemized. a penny is a penny.
|
t***s
发帖数: 4666 | 6 if you use itemized for 2008 and get a state refund, you'll have to
include that refund into 2009 income.
【在 W****N 的大作中提到】
: yes, my state tax refund is >$300. but why? 能不能展开讲讲?非常感谢!
|
W****N
发帖数: 299 | 7 right right right, thanks a lot!
【在 t***s 的大作中提到】
: if you use itemized for 2008 and get a state refund, you'll have to
: include that refund into 2009 income.
|
j*e
发帖数: 1987 | 8 But that 300 carried over to next year will only incur serveral tens of
income tax to him. Say he's 25% tax rate, then he only needs to pay $75 tax
next year if he itemlized this year. If he standard deduction, he lost $300
immediately. |
W****N
发帖数: 299 | 9 Damn, start all over again, thanks.
tax
300
【在 j*e 的大作中提到】
: But that 300 carried over to next year will only incur serveral tens of
: income tax to him. Say he's 25% tax rate, then he only needs to pay $75 tax
: next year if he itemlized this year. If he standard deduction, he lost $300
: immediately.
|
a**e
发帖数: 5794 | 10 How can he lose 300 immediately?
What he loses is only the tax on this 300, which is 75.
tax
300
【在 j*e 的大作中提到】
: But that 300 carried over to next year will only incur serveral tens of
: income tax to him. Say he's 25% tax rate, then he only needs to pay $75 tax
: next year if he itemlized this year. If he standard deduction, he lost $300
: immediately.
|
j*e
发帖数: 1987 | 11 题目是"itemized deduction比standard deduction就多300块钱"。我理解的是他今年
如果选择itemlize就比standard多退300块。如果选择standard，不是immediately
lose 300吗？
我刚才说的明年再多交75不对（假设25%税率），应该是他拿到的state tax refund X 25%。除非他的state tax refund > $1200,那他明年就要多交>1200X25%=300的联邦税，小于1200就是itemlize合算。 |
v***a
发帖数: 903 | 12 赞理解
X 25%。除非他的state tax refund > $1200,那他明年就要多交>1200X25%=300的联邦
税，小于1200就是itemlize合算。
【在 j*e 的大作中提到】
: 题目是"itemized deduction比standard deduction就多300块钱"。我理解的是他今年
: 如果选择itemlize就比standard多退300块。如果选择standard，不是immediately
: lose 300吗？
: 我刚才说的明年再多交75不对（假设25%税率），应该是他拿到的state tax refund X 25%。除非他的state tax refund > $1200,那他明年就要多交>1200X25%=300的联邦税，小于1200就是itemlize合算。
|
