s*****o
发帖数: 459 | |
s*****o
发帖数: 459 | 2 But many things will be different — for example, there will be far more
risk residing in the central clearinghouses, and non-bank competitors will
have become bigger lenders in the marketplace Clearinghouses will be the
repository of far more risk than they were in the last crisis
because more derivatives will be cleared in central clearinghouses. It is
important to remember that clearinghouses consolidate – but don’t
necessarily eliminate – risk.
That risk, however, is mitigated by proper margining and collateral. We have
long maintained that it is important to stress test central clearinghouses
in a similar way that banks are stress tested to make sure the central clear
- inghouses’ capital and resources are sufficient
for a highly stressed environment. Clearinghouses are a good thing but not
if they are a point of failure in the next crisis.
【在 s*****o 的大作中提到】
: http://www.businessinsider.com/jamie-dimon-letter-to-jpmorgan-s
: http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/ONE/15660259x0x820077/8a
|
s*****o
发帖数: 459 | |
g*******e
发帖数: 3013 | 4 求summary，他的pdf太长，就说JP咋应付，咋好了。
牛人既然贴了这帖子。就summarize一下他到底想说啥吧，多谢。 |
C******e
发帖数: 1850 | 5 这厮就是哭着嚷着政府对华尔街管得太严，看看他和参议员warren 的对话就明白他的
用意了。
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 1.0.2
【在 g*******e 的大作中提到】
: 求summary，他的pdf太长，就说JP咋应付，咋好了。
: 牛人既然贴了这帖子。就summarize一下他到底想说啥吧，多谢。
|
f*****a
发帖数: 693 | |
s*****o
发帖数: 459 | 7 其实我也没全看，只看我感兴趣的部分，楼上是总结
【在 g*******e 的大作中提到】
: 求summary，他的pdf太长，就说JP咋应付，咋好了。
: 牛人既然贴了这帖子。就summarize一下他到底想说啥吧，多谢。
|
m*****y
发帖数: 3981 | |
