m*****i
发帖数: 4342 | 1 Although I am against 劫富济贫, I do think for the sack of USA, time to tax
these CEOs who took the JOB oversea heavyly. Otherwise, USA is in big
trouble.
My friend told me last week that their division would be moved oversea by
the end of this year, 60 jobs would be cut to save roughly 2.5 million a
year for the company, yet, CEO made mover then 10 million in bonus every
year. What is the point so Call low tax will create jobs? |
B*******n
发帖数: 20645 | |
f******d
发帖数: 6361 | 3 agree!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tax those mother focker!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
tax
【在 m*****i 的大作中提到】
: Although I am against 劫富济贫, I do think for the sack of USA, time to tax
: these CEOs who took the JOB oversea heavyly. Otherwise, USA is in big
: trouble.
: My friend told me last week that their division would be moved oversea by
: the end of this year, 60 jobs would be cut to save roughly 2.5 million a
: year for the company, yet, CEO made mover then 10 million in bonus every
: year. What is the point so Call low tax will create jobs?
|
U********f
发帖数: 2482 | 4 TAX cannot solve the outsourcing problem.
the competition from oversea is the big challenge.
Company need survive first then the tax second. |
g******n
发帖数: 53185 | 5 年收入超过1百万的部分应该全部充公。每年一百万够他们花的 |
m*****i
发帖数: 4342 | 6 Outsourcing will only reduce the cost short term and boost the CEO/senior
management's bonus, longer term, it might cost more.
I know one of the company pay $65/hour for indian consultant, 5 years ago,
it was round $35/hour. So what's the cost benefit for paying $65/hour?
【在 U********f 的大作中提到】
: TAX cannot solve the outsourcing problem.
: the competition from oversea is the big challenge.
: Company need survive first then the tax second.
|
U********f
发帖数: 2482 | 7 $35/hour？ 没有这么便宜的CONSULTANT吧
80是正常的
【在 m*****i 的大作中提到】
: Outsourcing will only reduce the cost short term and boost the CEO/senior
: management's bonus, longer term, it might cost more.
: I know one of the company pay $65/hour for indian consultant, 5 years ago,
: it was round $35/hour. So what's the cost benefit for paying $65/hour?
|
N******r
发帖数: 642 | 8 who cares abt long term. only year end's bonus is what matters.
【在 m*****i 的大作中提到】
: Outsourcing will only reduce the cost short term and boost the CEO/senior
: management's bonus, longer term, it might cost more.
: I know one of the company pay $65/hour for indian consultant, 5 years ago,
: it was round $35/hour. So what's the cost benefit for paying $65/hour?
|
t*****9
发帖数: 10416 | |
s******t
发帖数: 12883 | 10 agree.
outsourcing only benefits ceo's bonus, no benefit to general employees or
job creation.
tax
【在 m*****i 的大作中提到】
: Although I am against 劫富济贫, I do think for the sack of USA, time to tax
: these CEOs who took the JOB oversea heavyly. Otherwise, USA is in big
: trouble.
: My friend told me last week that their division would be moved oversea by
: the end of this year, 60 jobs would be cut to save roughly 2.5 million a
: year for the company, yet, CEO made mover then 10 million in bonus every
: year. What is the point so Call low tax will create jobs?
|
|
|
s******t
发帖数: 12883 | 11 正是outsoursing教会了海外know-how.
如果没有outsoursing, 海外竞争追不上来， learning speed小于这边的创新speed.
但是这边一旦outsource, 海外就无成本得得到了技术。
【在 U********f 的大作中提到】
: TAX cannot solve the outsourcing problem.
: the competition from oversea is the big challenge.
: Company need survive first then the tax second.
|
k********8
发帖数: 7948 | |
N********n
发帖数: 8363 | 13
Don't fall for liberal brainwash. Business goes where there's cheaper
and more affordable labor. You can not tax that principle away.
【在 m*****i 的大作中提到】
: Although I am against 劫富济贫, I do think for the sack of USA, time to tax
: these CEOs who took the JOB oversea heavyly. Otherwise, USA is in big
: trouble.
: My friend told me last week that their division would be moved oversea by
: the end of this year, 60 jobs would be cut to save roughly 2.5 million a
: year for the company, yet, CEO made mover then 10 million in bonus every
: year. What is the point so Call low tax will create jobs?
|
r***a
发帖数: 2628 | 14 那老爷的90%的财产不得充公吗？
【在 g******n 的大作中提到】
: 年收入超过1百万的部分应该全部充公。每年一百万够他们花的
|
g******n
发帖数: 53185 | 15 我每年哪里能挣到100万
【在 r***a 的大作中提到】
: 那老爷的90%的财产不得充公吗？
|
U********f
发帖数: 2482 | 16 先要有know-how，才有可能拿到工作。如果不知道know-how，怎么可能人家请你来做呢？
【在 s******t 的大作中提到】
: 正是outsoursing教会了海外know-how.
: 如果没有outsoursing, 海外竞争追不上来， learning speed小于这边的创新speed.
: 但是这边一旦outsource, 海外就无成本得得到了技术。
|
s******t
发帖数: 12883 | 17 income is not same as property
【在 r***a 的大作中提到】
: 那老爷的90%的财产不得充公吗？
|
r***a
发帖数: 2628 | 18 你金子增值的部分也不止吧。
以后看来得有财产增值税。
【在 g******n 的大作中提到】
: 我每年哪里能挣到100万
|
g******n
发帖数: 53185 | 19 不卖怎么增值，我藏着呢，没人知道在哪里
【在 r***a 的大作中提到】
: 你金子增值的部分也不止吧。
: 以后看来得有财产增值税。
|
N********n
发帖数: 8363 | 20 Instead of going after oversea CEOs the right question to ask is why
Americans are so un-hirable. |
|
|
r***a
发帖数: 2628 | 21 还是老爷想的长远啊，
到时候留给儿子，财产税都省了。
【在 g******n 的大作中提到】
: 不卖怎么增值，我藏着呢，没人知道在哪里
|
s********i
发帖数: 17328 | 22 most entry level jobs do not need know-how. after they get full access to
your knowledge base, they get know-how.
呢？
【在 U********f 的大作中提到】
: 先要有know-how，才有可能拿到工作。如果不知道know-how，怎么可能人家请你来做呢？
|
s********i
发帖数: 17328 | 23 all robbers need to equip with metal detector.
【在 g******n 的大作中提到】
: 不卖怎么增值，我藏着呢，没人知道在哪里
|
a********t
发帖数: 4508 | 24 论点和标题不符。
论据不支持论点。
tax
【在 m*****i 的大作中提到】
: Although I am against 劫富济贫, I do think for the sack of USA, time to tax
: these CEOs who took the JOB oversea heavyly. Otherwise, USA is in big
: trouble.
: My friend told me last week that their division would be moved oversea by
: the end of this year, 60 jobs would be cut to save roughly 2.5 million a
: year for the company, yet, CEO made mover then 10 million in bonus every
: year. What is the point so Call low tax will create jobs?
|
g******n
发帖数: 53185 | 25 他们敢动银行吗，我的保险箱的银行边上是警察局
【在 s********i 的大作中提到】
: all robbers need to equip with metal detector.
|
U********f
发帖数: 2482 | 26 有遗产税的喔
【在 r***a 的大作中提到】
: 还是老爷想的长远啊，
: 到时候留给儿子，财产税都省了。
|
k********8
发帖数: 7948 | 27 看似最安全的地方往往是最薄弱的地方
没看好莱坞大片里动不动就是偷砸抢警察局吗
hiahia
【在 g******n 的大作中提到】
: 他们敢动银行吗，我的保险箱的银行边上是警察局
|
g******n
发帖数: 53185 | 28 好莱坞大片是给孩子们看的,一般的贼都这样
【在 k********8 的大作中提到】
: 看似最安全的地方往往是最薄弱的地方
: 没看好莱坞大片里动不动就是偷砸抢警察局吗
: hiahia
|
