a*****7
发帖数: 20 | |
z****n
发帖数: 1514 | 2 In short to mid term, they are similar.
In long term, (1) short has limited profit and unlimited loss.(2)short can
earn time decay value built into FAZ or FAS while long will lose time
decay value in the opposite. YMYD.
【在 a*****7 的大作中提到】
: 新手向大牛们请教。
|
a*****7
发帖数: 20 | |
y***5
发帖数: 33 | 4 if you have a huge account and good sense of long term trend, go with short
if you have a small account and good sense of short term tread, go with long
if you are a frog, stay away from them
【在 z****n 的大作中提到】
: In short to mid term, they are similar.
: In long term, (1) short has limited profit and unlimited loss.(2)short can
: earn time decay value built into FAZ or FAS while long will lose time
: decay value in the opposite. YMYD.
|
s******m
发帖数: 1309 | 5 能麻烦谁给个例子么？为什么有“time decay value built into FAZ or FAS ”？？
谢谢！
【在 z****n 的大作中提到】
: In short to mid term, they are similar.
: In long term, (1) short has limited profit and unlimited loss.(2)short can
: earn time decay value built into FAZ or FAS while long will lose time
: decay value in the opposite. YMYD.
|
z****n
发帖数: 1514 | 6 简单的说就是这些几倍的ETF都用了option来做放大效应，所以就像option一样有time
decay.但
是如果你就持有几天或者几个星期是不用考虑这个的，可以忽略不计。
【在 s******m 的大作中提到】
: 能麻烦谁给个例子么？为什么有“time decay value built into FAZ or FAS ”？？
: 谢谢！
|
s******m
发帖数: 1309 | 7 谢谢：）
time
【在 z****n 的大作中提到】
: 简单的说就是这些几倍的ETF都用了option来做放大效应，所以就像option一样有time
: decay.但
: 是如果你就持有几天或者几个星期是不用考虑这个的，可以忽略不计。
|
