|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
j***y
发帖数: 1640 | 1 CNBC: According to multiple sources, a trader entered a "b" for billion
instead of an "m" for million in a trade possibly involving Procter & Gamble | N****w
发帖数: 21578 | 2 一个 trader 能同时触发这么多股票交易？
权力很大啊
Gamble
【在 j***y 的大作中提到】
: CNBC: According to multiple sources, a trader entered a "b" for billion
: instead of an "m" for million in a trade possibly involving Procter & Gamble
| j*****n
发帖数: 3617 | | f********e
发帖数: 1079 | 4 shit...那也不会每个股票同一时刻冲下去。现在完全可以解释有机器人"看"盘的 | x*******i
发帖数: 1791 | 5 So there’s still no clear explanation for what just sent the Dow on that
ridiculous slide. But the questions are starting to come faster and faster.
A biggie: What was the role of computerized trading to blame?
On a related point, a few have pointed out some rather strange action in
Procter & Gamble shares. A P&G spokeswoman said the company doesn’t know
what might have caused a sudden drop and said that it is looking into the
matter, according to the Dow Jones reporter covering the company. Any |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
