p**********a
发帖数: 93 | 1 Ho:上帝存在
如果上帝存在而你不相信上帝--Type I Error
如果并没有上帝而你相信上帝--Type II Error
郑重声明:本人绝没有诋毁及亵渎基督教之意。这里设Ho为“上帝存在”并不代表本人
认为上帝不存在。当然本人也并非教徒。如伤害到哪位的宗教信仰，深感抱歉。 |
T*******I
发帖数: 5138 | 2 无论对错，但有创意！赞一个。
【在 p**********a 的大作中提到】
: Ho:上帝存在
: 如果上帝存在而你不相信上帝--Type I Error
: 如果并没有上帝而你相信上帝--Type II Error
: 郑重声明:本人绝没有诋毁及亵渎基督教之意。这里设Ho为“上帝存在”并不代表本人
: 认为上帝不存在。当然本人也并非教徒。如伤害到哪位的宗教信仰，深感抱歉。
|
l**********9
发帖数: 148 | 3 I remember that i have read a book about the relation between the science
and the GOD. It says that we are only the one who find the rule, while the
GOD is the one who create the rule. We should glory the creator rather than
the finder.
I mean, may be the God and the science can get along very well =v= |
B******y
发帖数: 9065 | 4 难道这里就没有人看过The Lady Tasting Tea这本书吗？作者是David Salsburg， 在
前言里面有一段论述...Typical of this cultural lag is the exchange between
Emperor Napoleon and Pierre Simon Laplace in the early years of the
nineteenth century. Laplace had written a monumental and definitive book
describing how to compute the future positions of planets and comets on the
basis of a few observations from Earth. "I find no mention of God in your
treaties, M. Laplace," Napoleon is reported to have said. "I had no need for
that hypoth |
