由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Soccer版 - about slide tackle (ZT)
相关主题
对付盘球好的有一招if you think RVP's red card was harsh
铲球是足球的一部分录像在此,根本就没有碰到
几个前锋右后卫。。。。大sb啊
kloise的两张黄牌给的都有问题这个点球不判太过分
英格兰没赢的关键是没有跑动我今天终于知道我原来是世界级的后卫
ESPN在第101遍的播美国的进球哈哈哈
espn对裁判很不满弱问一些球场上用的英文表述
如果现在规则还像90世界杯那样可以随便砍人腿,巴萨还能这么风Worst tackles
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: tackle话题: slide话题: ball话题: opponent话题: tackler
进入Soccer版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
s**l
发帖数: 11983
1
summary:
In brief, there is only one way to slide tackle– safely
How can tackles become illegal? Two of the most common ways are by making
contact with the opponent first (before contacting the ball) and by striking
the opponent with a raised upper leg before, during, or after contacting
the ball with the lower leg.
SLIDE TACKLING
April 17, 2007
Question:
Can you explain to me the proper ways to do slide tackles?My understanding
is when the ball is controlled at the attackers feet, that there is no way
to execute it without alot of luck.ÊLuck meaning the attacking player
was not wiped out.——-The attacking player with the ballÊis going down
almost all the timeÊfrom the defender executing the slide tackle. A
foul (correct ?) even if the ball is struck first.——-The sliding leg of
the defender has to be the one closest to the attacker with the ball (
approaching the attackerÊfrom the left side means the slide tackle from
the defender has to slide with the right leg to strike ball) if this not
down, a foul (correct ?)———–My understanding of the proper way, is the
ball has to be a couple of feet (2-3) in front of the attacker with the ball
, the defender still has to use the leg to strike the ball that is on the
same side as the attacker, and if executed this way, there is no foul
because the attacker has a chance of defensive moves from the tackle. The
other way mentioned the attacker has no chance at all.ÊÊThe above
examples are with players moving at full speed. This is explained how, so I
can easily relay this to the appropriate people in our league.
USSF answer (April 17, 2007):
We have not responded to your question in the way you requested, but we
think we have answered it in the only way possible. In brief, there is only
one way to slide tackle– safely. And when it is not safe, it is almost
always so unsafe as to require a red card for serious foul play.
The term “slide tackle” refers to an attempt to tackle the ball away from
an opponent while sliding on the ground. A slide tackle is legal, provided
it is performed legally. In other words, there is nothing illegal about a
slide tackle by itself–no matter where it is done and no matter the
direction from which it comes. Referees (and spectators) should not get hung
up on the term “slide” tackling. There is nothing in our concern
regarding endangering the safety of the opponent which limits this to a
slide tackle. In fact, if, in the opinion of the referee, the tackle
endangers the safety of the opponent, it makes no difference if there is
contact or not.
FIFA emphasized in the past the great danger in slide tackles from behind
because, if this tackle is not done perfectly, the potential for injury is
so much greater. Nowadays, if the referee decides that the foul while
tackling from any direction–from the front, the side, or the rear–was done
in such a way as to endanger the safety of the opponent, the proper action
is to send the violator off the field with a red card.
How can tackles become illegal? Two of the most common ways are by making
contact with the opponent first (before contacting the ball) and by striking
the opponent with a raised upper leg before, during, or after contacting
the ball with the lower leg. Referees must be vigilant and firm in assessing
any tackle, because the likely point of contact is the lower legs of the
opponent and this is a particularly vulnerable area.
The referee must judge each situation of a tackle from any direction
individually, weighing the guidelines published by FIFA and the U. S. Soccer
Federation, the positions of the players, the way the tackler uses his/her
foot or feet, the “temperature” of the game, the age/skill of the players,
and the attitude of the players. Only then can the referee make a sensible
decision.
While one may (and should) sympathize with the injured player, soccer is a
tough, competitive sport, and injuries can happen with no associated
infringement of the Law. Players who act on the basis of the opposite
presumption, abetted by like-minded spectators, do the sport no good.
For the sake of those who would punish any tackle, we ask that players and
referees alike remember that it is not a foul if a sliding tackle is
successful and the player whose ball was tackled away then falls over the
tackler’s foot. It has to be in the opinion of the referee, but if the
tackler accomplishes the objective of taking the ball safely and within the
meaning of the Law, then it makes no difference if the player who was
tackled then falls down. With a big “UNLESS”: if, in the referee’s
opinion, the tackler has used excessive force, then the tackler should be
sent off for serious foul play. Or, if the tackler makes the tackle and then
lifts either the tackling foot or the other foot and trips the opponent,
that is a foul. Simply because a player falls over the foot of the tackler
is not a dangerous thing. It’s one of the breaks of the game.
s**l
发帖数: 11983
2
Busquests stroke the opponent with a raised upper leg after contacting the
ball with the lower leg.
So it is illegal.
e***t
发帖数: 14386
3
请问什么姿势的"upper leg"不是raised的?

【在 s**l 的大作中提到】
: Busquests stroke the opponent with a raised upper leg after contacting the
: ball with the lower leg.
: So it is illegal.

I******8
发帖数: 3174
4
For which he was, rightly, penalized. And your point is?

【在 s**l 的大作中提到】
: Busquests stroke the opponent with a raised upper leg after contacting the
: ball with the lower leg.
: So it is illegal.

s**l
发帖数: 11983
5
my point is Busquests fouled in his tackle, because his tackle was dangerous
. That is 1st priority of slide tackle.

【在 I******8 的大作中提到】
: For which he was, rightly, penalized. And your point is?
e***t
发帖数: 14386
6
dangerous个头

dangerous

【在 s**l 的大作中提到】
: my point is Busquests fouled in his tackle, because his tackle was dangerous
: . That is 1st priority of slide tackle.

s**l
发帖数: 11983
7
Busquests knocked Pazzini to his left, which is a big hit from side. This
hit moved Pazzini from right to left side by at least 10 cms.
video:
http://att.newsmth.net/nForum/att/WorldSoccer/15328602/225
This is very dangerous for Pazzini, which can easily break the bones.
good slide tackles:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cMg8pPWOrs
In this video, no tacklers knocked the ball-holders to move side to side.
The holders can fall, and the simply falling is not a foul. The foul comes
from whether the tackle is safe for the holder.

【在 e***t 的大作中提到】
: dangerous个头
:
: dangerous

e***t
发帖数: 14386
8
这跟dangerous有什么关系
你所谓的big hit也就是个摸毛级别

【在 s**l 的大作中提到】
: Busquests knocked Pazzini to his left, which is a big hit from side. This
: hit moved Pazzini from right to left side by at least 10 cms.
: video:
: http://att.newsmth.net/nForum/att/WorldSoccer/15328602/225
: This is very dangerous for Pazzini, which can easily break the bones.
: good slide tackles:
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cMg8pPWOrs
: In this video, no tacklers knocked the ball-holders to move side to side.
: The holders can fall, and the simply falling is not a foul. The foul comes
: from whether the tackle is safe for the holder.

s**l
发帖数: 11983
9
haha, you are so funny.

【在 e***t 的大作中提到】
: 这跟dangerous有什么关系
: 你所谓的big hit也就是个摸毛级别

u****d
发帖数: 1278
10
视频里大部分都是经典教案,不过有些我不同意,杰拉德有一个就很危险

【在 s**l 的大作中提到】
: Busquests knocked Pazzini to his left, which is a big hit from side. This
: hit moved Pazzini from right to left side by at least 10 cms.
: video:
: http://att.newsmth.net/nForum/att/WorldSoccer/15328602/225
: This is very dangerous for Pazzini, which can easily break the bones.
: good slide tackles:
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cMg8pPWOrs
: In this video, no tacklers knocked the ball-holders to move side to side.
: The holders can fall, and the simply falling is not a foul. The foul comes
: from whether the tackle is safe for the holder.

b*****e
发帖数: 53215
11
小姐出道的时候以双飞著称

【在 u****d 的大作中提到】
: 视频里大部分都是经典教案,不过有些我不同意,杰拉德有一个就很危险
u****d
发帖数: 1278
12
难怪

【在 b*****e 的大作中提到】
: 小姐出道的时候以双飞著称
b*****e
发帖数: 53215
13
那时候他十足的的愣头青,踢法就是一个猛字,完全不收
没有踢断几条腿俺表示狠惊讶

【在 u****d 的大作中提到】
: 难怪
1 (共1页)
进入Soccer版参与讨论
相关主题
Worst tackles英格兰没赢的关键是没有跑动
欧足联官网统计ESPN在第101遍的播美国的进球
打大力是上克洛泽还是戈麦斯espn对裁判很不满
本届欧洲杯四强主要数据榜如果现在规则还像90世界杯那样可以随便砍人腿,巴萨还能这么风
对付盘球好的有一招if you think RVP's red card was harsh
铲球是足球的一部分录像在此,根本就没有碰到
几个前锋右后卫。。。。大sb啊
kloise的两张黄牌给的都有问题这个点球不判太过分
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: tackle话题: slide话题: ball话题: opponent话题: tackler