m*****e
发帖数: 3 | 1 1） 看了很多都是说对asian student的影响，这个时肯定地了。要是想在政治上更
有说服力，团结到等多的人，我们是不是可以从SCA5对加州长远教育科研的负面影响多
宣传一下？参见这个文章http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/02/22/beyond-race-in-affirmative-action/merit-not-race-in-college-admissions
和wiki里面http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action#Opposition
大意就是
Race-based preference produces a population of students whose intellectual
strength varies strongly according to race. This is highly corrosive to the
atmosphere on campus. Furthermore, the evidence is strong that students of
weaker ability who are admitted via preference do not close the gap during
college.
SCA5 will be destructive to the CA public universities, make them lose the
leadership role that they have today. This will in turn has long term
negative effect on various industries (high tech in particular) in CA, which
are major economical contributors of CA, as CA public universities are
their major talent feeder.
大家是不是可以考虑在学校， high tech公司做些宣传，主要说明对教育科研科技的长
期负面影响。学术圈很多人都是民主党，让学校的authority看到对学校的负面影响，
自己出来反对SCA5会更有说服力。
2) 另外看见facebook有个Asian American against Affirmative action， 有不少人
like. 个人觉得Affirmative action是一个更大的概念，不同人有很多不同的
interpretation。这个时候有重点地反对SCA5，而不是扩大反对范围(i.e.
Affirmative action.)，有利于更清楚的阐述反对原因，团结到更多的人。另外，
Affirmative action in principle, is to "hire/select without regard to race,
sex, religion and national origin". SCA5 is against Affirmative action from
this perspective. | r******8
发帖数: 926 | 2 顶！这个很 策略。是用来团结最多人（其他族裔）的最好理由！ | x*****u
发帖数: 6559 | 3 主要说明对教育科研科技的长期负面影响。这话你悄悄说可以，出去宣传不是找骂么？ |
|
