T******g
发帖数: 21328 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 GunsAndGears 讨论区 】
发信人: Blazer (光说不练), 信区: GunsAndGears
标 题: Re: cnn上这个案子以前有人听说过么？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Oct 4 20:24:31 2010, 美东)
找到出处了，是14个小时。
Warren v. District of Columbia is one of the leading cases of this type. Two
women were upstairs in a townhouse when they heard their roommate, a third
woman, being attacked downstairs by intruders. They phoned the police
several times and were assured that officers were on the way. After about 30
minutes, when their roommate's screams had stopped, they assumed the police
had finally arrived. When the two women went downstairs they saw that in
fact the police never came, but the intruders were still there. As the
Warren court graphically states in the opinion: "For the next fourteen hours
the women were held captive, raped, robbed, beaten, forced to commit sexual
acts upon each other, and made to submit to the sexual demands of their
attackers."
The three women sued the District of Columbia for failing to protect them,
but D.C.'s highest court exonerated the District and its police, saying that
it is a "fundamental principle of American law that a government and its
agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police
protection, to any individual citizen." [4] There are many similar cases
with results to the same effect. [5]
到强暴声停止，以为是警察来了，下楼一看，歹徒还在，结果两女又被强暴。事后告警
察，法官判警察没事。 | B******e
发帖数: 5730 | | f*****s
发帖数: 3868 | 3 还有个在san jose发生的case
Ruth Brunell called the police on 20 different occasions to plead for
protection from her husband. He was arrested only one time. One evening Mr.
Brunell telephoned his wife and told her he was coming over to kill her.
When she called the police, they refused her request that they come to
protect her. They told her to call back when he got there. Mr. Brunell
stabbed his wife to death before she could call the police to tell them that
he was there. The court held that the San Jose police were not liable for
ignoring Mrs. Brunell’s pleas for help. Hartzler v. City of San Jose, 46
Cal. App. 3d 6 (1st Dist. 1975).
[Those of you in the Silicon Valley, please note what city this happened in!]
Two
third
30
police
【在 T******g 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 GunsAndGears 讨论区 】
: 发信人: Blazer (光说不练), 信区: GunsAndGears
: 标 题: Re: cnn上这个案子以前有人听说过么？
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Oct 4 20:24:31 2010, 美东)
: 找到出处了，是14个小时。
: Warren v. District of Columbia is one of the leading cases of this type. Two
: women were upstairs in a townhouse when they heard their roommate, a third
: woman, being attacked downstairs by intruders. They phoned the police
: several times and were assured that officers were on the way. After about 30
: minutes, when their roommate's screams had stopped, they assumed the police
| m*****e
发帖数: 4193 | 4 I am wondering why the case got no jury. Was it thrown out before getting a
trial? | B******e
发帖数: 5730 | 5 没事乱打911，
真正有事，警察不来了，典型的狼来了 | T******g
发帖数: 21328 | 6 两回事，法院说了警察没义务保护个人，虽然是靠纳税人的钱养的，呵呵
保命还是要靠自己呀
【在 B******e 的大作中提到】
: 没事乱打911，
: 真正有事，警察不来了，典型的狼来了
| B******e
发帖数: 5730 | 7 不信试试看
第一回打911，警察立马来
但是一旦调查，小两口吵架，没大的身体冲突
也后再打，他们就不怎么来了
法院是警察开的，保护警察，
那是另一回事
【在 T******g 的大作中提到】
: 两回事，法院说了警察没义务保护个人，虽然是靠纳税人的钱养的，呵呵
: 保命还是要靠自己呀
| n***b
发帖数: 5914 | 8 富人区就算狗叫警察也来
【在 B******e 的大作中提到】
: 不信试试看
: 第一回打911，警察立马来
: 但是一旦调查，小两口吵架，没大的身体冲突
: 也后再打，他们就不怎么来了
: 法院是警察开的，保护警察，
: 那是另一回事
| G****s
发帖数: 3523 | 9 no matter how absurd this is, but it's true that police is not tied to a
contract of protecting any individual. nor are they commited to protect the
safety of the hostage in a kidnap case.
as individual, you need to be able to protect yourself. if you don't want to
do that, DO NOT stop others who do. | T******g
发帖数: 21328 | 10 别这么肯定，很多受害人也是第一次打911。警察没有义务保护你个人。丫就是国家统
治机器的一部分。
发信人: StupidMIT (史密斯和韦森和我), 信区: GunsAndGears
标 题: cnn上这个案子以前有人听说过么？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Oct 4 18:24:34 2010, 美东)
刚刚在网上闲逛看见的，为啥能上头条？
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/10/04/connecticut.murder.trial/index.htm
l?hpt=T1
入室抢劫，强奸了女主人和17岁的大女儿，天亮了再带着女主人去银行提钱。回去放一
把火烧死三个。康州的new heaven，两个犯人都是白人。
女事主去银行拿钱的时候已经告诉里面的人她家人被绑架在自己家里，对方也立马报警
了，但是警察33分钟之后才到，那时侯房子已经着火了，警察在外面设警戒线而不是进屋搜查。那
三个可怜的女人就这么被活活烧死了。
【在 B******e 的大作中提到】
: 不信试试看
: 第一回打911，警察立马来
: 但是一旦调查，小两口吵架，没大的身体冲突
: 也后再打，他们就不怎么来了
: 法院是警察开的，保护警察，
: 那是另一回事
| n****n
发帖数: 568 | 11 就凭这几个案子我就完全支持第二修正案.靠天靠地不如靠自己.
【在 T******g 的大作中提到】
: 别这么肯定，很多受害人也是第一次打911。警察没有义务保护你个人。丫就是国家统
: 治机器的一部分。
: 发信人: StupidMIT (史密斯和韦森和我), 信区: GunsAndGears
: 标 题: cnn上这个案子以前有人听说过么？
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Oct 4 18:24:34 2010, 美东)
: 刚刚在网上闲逛看见的，为啥能上头条？
: http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/10/04/connecticut.murder.trial/index.htm
: l?hpt=T1
: 入室抢劫，强奸了女主人和17岁的大女儿，天亮了再带着女主人去银行提钱。回去放一
: 把火烧死三个。康州的new heaven，两个犯人都是白人。
|
|
