由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
QueerNews版 - 艾未未在<卫报>撰文抱怨"The US is behaving like China".
相关主题
Religious Right, Oppressed Minority普及一下艾未未的裸照和葵花籽
Re: 不能不承认Ron Paul这老哥们太特立独行了 (转载)艾未未事件的新华社定调:Police probe adds to controversy s
某同性恋支持者认为互联网再曝--文汇报文章杜撰事实抹黑艾未未
NYTimes: New Virginia Attorney General Drops Defense of Gay Marriage Ban对近期时事的一些感想
同性恋对这两则研究结果抱什么看法?不与权利合作的艾未未
同志骄傲月,佛吉尼亚州联邦储备银行上空彩虹旗飘扬艾未未完了zz
打个比方吧艾未未,揭开他的真面目
说到抹黑,看五毛怎么抹黑艾未未艾未未,揭开他的真面目
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: us话题: china话题: people话题: power
进入QueerNews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
D**S
发帖数: 24887
1
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/11/nsa-surveil
NSA surveillance: The US is behaving like China
Both governments think they are doing what is best for the state and people.
But, as I know, such abuse of power can ruin lives
Ai Weiwei
The Guardian, Tuesday 11 June 2013 09.30 EDT
NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden and Barack Obama appear on the front pages
of local papers in Hong Kong on 11 June 2013. Photograph: Bobby Yip/Reuters
Even though we know governments do all kinds of things I was shocked by the
information about the US surveillance operation, Prism. To me, it's
abusively using government powers to interfere in individuals' privacy. This
is an important moment for international society to reconsider and protect
individual rights.
I lived in the United States for 12 years. This abuse of state power goes
totally against my understanding of what it means to be a civilised society,
and it will be shocking for me if American citizens allow this to continue.
The US has a great tradition of individualism and privacy and has long been
a centre for free thinking and creativity as a result.
In our experience in China, basically there is no privacy at all – that is
why China is far behind the world in important respects: even though it has
become so rich, it trails behind in terms of passion, imagination and
creativity.
Of course, we live under different kinds of legal conditions – in the west
and in developed nations there are other laws that can balance or restrain
the use of information if the government has it. That is not the case in
China, and individuals are completely naked as a result. Intrusions can
completely ruin a person's life, and I don't think that could happen in
western nations.
But still, if we talk about abusive interference in individuals' rights,
Prism does the same. It puts individuals in a very vulnerable position.
Privacy is a basic human right, one of the very core values. There is no
guarantee that China, the US or any other government will not use the
information falsely or wrongly. I think especially that a nation like the US
, which is technically advanced, should not take advantage of its power. It
encourages other nations.
Before the information age the Chinese government could decide you were a
counter-revolutionary just because a neighbour reported something they had
overheard. Thousands, even millions of lives were ruined through the misuse
of such information.
Today, through its technical abilities, the state can easily get into
anybody's bank account, private mail, conversations, and social media
accounts. The internet and social media give us new possibilities of
exploring ourselves.
But we have never exposed ourselves in this way before, and it makes us
vulnerable if anyone chooses to use it against us. Any information or
communication could put young people under the surveillance of the state.
Very often, when oppressive states arrest people, they have that information
in their hands. It can be used as a way of controlling you, to tell you: we
know exactly what you're thinking or doing. It can drive people to madness.
When human beings are scared and feel everything is exposed to the
government, we will censor ourselves from free thinking. That's dangerous
for human development.
In the Soviet Union before, in China today, and even in the US, officials
always think what they do is necessary, and firmly believe they do what is
best for the state and the people. But the lesson that people should learn
from history is the need to limit state power.
If a government is elected by the people, and is genuinely working for the
people, they should not give in to these temptations.
During my detention in China I was watched 24 hours a day. The light was
always on. There were two guards on two-hour shifts standing next to me –
even watching when I swallowed a pill; I had to open mouth so they could see
my throat. You have to take a shower in front of them; they watch you while
you brush your teeth, in the name of making sure you're not hurting
yourself. They had three surveillance cameras to make sure the guards would
not communicate with me.
But the guards whispered to me. They told stories about themselves. There is
always humanity and privacy, even under the most restrictive conditions.
To limit power is to protect society. It is not only about protecting
individuals' rights but making power healthier.
Civilisation is built on that trust and everyone must fight to defend it,
and to protect our vulnerable aspects – our inner feelings, our families.
We must not hand over our rights to other people. No state power should be
given that kind of trust. Not China. Not the US.
O*******d
发帖数: 20343
2
艾未未就是一个无政府主义者。
1 (共1页)
进入QueerNews版参与讨论
相关主题
艾未未,揭开他的真面目同性恋对这两则研究结果抱什么看法?
这里有多少人不喜欢茅于轼的同志骄傲月,佛吉尼亚州联邦储备银行上空彩虹旗飘扬
英国皇家艺术学院授艾未未荣誉院士ZZ打个比方吧
艾未未終於返家( zt )说到抹黑,看五毛怎么抹黑艾未未
Religious Right, Oppressed Minority普及一下艾未未的裸照和葵花籽
Re: 不能不承认Ron Paul这老哥们太特立独行了 (转载)艾未未事件的新华社定调:Police probe adds to controversy s
某同性恋支持者认为互联网再曝--文汇报文章杜撰事实抹黑艾未未
NYTimes: New Virginia Attorney General Drops Defense of Gay Marriage Ban对近期时事的一些感想
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: us话题: china话题: people话题: power