m*****e
发帖数: 692 | 1 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703699204575016983630045768.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories
WASHINGTON—President Barack Obama proposed Thursday new rules designed to
restrict the size and activities of the U.S.'s biggest banks, the latest in
a series of administration moves to curb Wall Street.
The White House wants commercial banks that take deposits from customers to
be barred from investing on behalf of the bank itself—what's known as
proprietary trading—and said the administrat |
J**********g
发帖数: 213 | 2 yeah, don't know it's good or bad for us..... |
J**********g
发帖数: 213 | |
x**y
发帖数: 10012 | 4 反正没招我。。。
玩死这帮银行。。。
in
to
the
to
【在 m*****e 的大作中提到】
: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703699204575016983630045768.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories
: WASHINGTON—President Barack Obama proposed Thursday new rules designed to
: restrict the size and activities of the U.S.'s biggest banks, the latest in
: a series of administration moves to curb Wall Street.
: The White House wants commercial banks that take deposits from customers to
: be barred from investing on behalf of the bank itself—what's known as
: proprietary trading—and said the administrat
|
J**********g
发帖数: 213 | 5 It might be worse than expected, though it takes time...
Again, don't know if this is good or not for us...
【在 x**y 的大作中提到】
: 反正没招我。。。
: 玩死这帮银行。。。
:
: in
: to
: the
: to
|
x**y
发帖数: 10012 | 6 其实可能没区别
无非是分拆了。。。
其实银行投资投机型的债权本来对社会进步没价值
【在 J**********g 的大作中提到】
: It might be worse than expected, though it takes time...
: Again, don't know if this is good or not for us...
|
j******n
发帖数: 271 | 7 It mattered short term if it went into law. In that case, believe me, Wall
Street would "engineer" some new tricks, or find holes in existing or new
regulation to suck resources from the society. They are paying $$$$$$$$$$$$$
to army of PhDs, lawyers and gamblers to do this. |
x****o
发帖数: 29677 | 8 good, thats means new hole, new model, more PHD, more quant |
H****y
发帖数: 19 | 9 Should be a good thing in the long run. Bear went down because two of its
hedge funds went under first. Many banks took a huge position in mbs through
their prop trading that resulted in massive losses, and eventually needed
federal bailout or went bankrupt. If the banks can only do business that
serves their clients, they wouldn't have taken such positions themselves,
thus much smaller systemic risk to the whole economy. |
V****u
发帖数: 73 | 10 it is not good news for quant at all. |
J**********g
发帖数: 213 | 11 something worth watching though time taking too. hehe:
mis-posted first. a pretty good song. hehe.
Keith Whitley-"When You Say Nothing At All" (STEREO!) |
