由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Programming版 - [bssd]The Linux Foundation's demands to UMN
进入Programming版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
c*******v
发帖数: 2599
1
https://www.zdnet.com/article/the-linux-foundations-demands-to-the-
university-of-minnesota-for-its-bad-linux-patches/
原文较长,我个人看,关键就这两部分吧。一个是这件事定性,"
unethical, and likely involves many legal issues".
另一个是一些要求。包括我之前认为的,要给所有experiment的资料。
(The letter, from Mike Dolan, the Linux Foundation's senior VP and general
manager of projects, )
[1]
It has come to our attention that some University of Minnesota (U of MN)
researchers appear to have been experimenting on people, specifically the
Linux kernel developers, without those developers' prior knowledge or
consent.
.....
However, we believe experiments on people without their consent is unethical
, and likely involves many legal issues. People are an integral part of the
software review and development process. The Linux kernel developers are not
test subjects, and must not be treated as such.
......
It appears these experiments were performed without prior review or
approval by an Institutional Review Board (IRB), which is not acceptable,
and an after-the-fact IRB review approved this experimentation on those who
did not consent.
[2]
Please provide to the public, in an expedited manner, all information
necessary to identify all proposals of known-vulnerable code from any U of
MN experiment. The information should include the name of each targeted
software, the commit information, purported name of the proposer, email
address, date/time, subject, and/or code, so that all software developers
can quickly identify such proposals and potentially take remedial action for
such experiments.
C*****l
发帖数: 1
2
跟我之前预测的没啥两样,就是交出实验用的账号
c******8
发帖数: 445
3
还要求撤销论文
n******t
发帖数: 4406
4
我認爲Linux ban任何人comit的權限是沒問題的。但是要求別人做實驗要通知他們也是
沒有任何道理的。
這年頭,人都不知道就事論事,而是互相亂咬。

【在 c*******v 的大作中提到】
: https://www.zdnet.com/article/the-linux-foundations-demands-to-the-
: university-of-minnesota-for-its-bad-linux-patches/
: 原文较长,我个人看,关键就这两部分吧。一个是这件事定性,"
: unethical, and likely involves many legal issues".
: 另一个是一些要求。包括我之前认为的,要给所有experiment的资料。
: (The letter, from Mike Dolan, the Linux Foundation's senior VP and general
: manager of projects, )
: [1]
: It has come to our attention that some University of Minnesota (U of MN)
: researchers appear to have been experimenting on people, specifically the

c*******v
发帖数: 2599
5
这个文件给出理由是,这属于experiment on people.
"experiment on people"这三个字,在文件中出现了两次。
第二次说:
People are an integral part of the
software review and development process. The Linux kernel developers are not
test subjects, and must not be treated as such.

【在 n******t 的大作中提到】
: 我認爲Linux ban任何人comit的權限是沒問題的。但是要求別人做實驗要通知他們也是
: 沒有任何道理的。
: 這年頭,人都不知道就事論事,而是互相亂咬。

1 (共1页)
进入Programming版参与讨论