d*****l
发帖数: 8441 | 1 Is it worth learning?
I feel that it's strong in string processing.
But I found that its disadvantage is that there is no unified standards for
a variety of open-source modules under development now. |
n********a
发帖数: 119 | 2 Probably Perl is even stronger in string processing
for
【在 d*****l 的大作中提到】
: Is it worth learning?
: I feel that it's strong in string processing.
: But I found that its disadvantage is that there is no unified standards for
: a variety of open-source modules under development now.
|
o******r
发帖数: 259 | 3 It is a glue language to me.
Kind of script but oo supported too.
You can write data structure & algorithm codes too.
It is easier than C/C++, at least quicker in coding.
My 2 cents. |
b******n
发帖数: 592 | 4 The regular expression is not as easy to use as perl. For text, perl is the
best for quick hack. I found Python is good for data structure, algorithm. B
ut for text, perl is the best
for
【在 d*****l 的大作中提到】
: Is it worth learning?
: I feel that it's strong in string processing.
: But I found that its disadvantage is that there is no unified standards for
: a variety of open-source modules under development now.
|
d***q
发帖数: 1119 | 5 one hour for learn
ahd then start using it hehe
the
B
【在 b******n 的大作中提到】
: The regular expression is not as easy to use as perl. For text, perl is the
: best for quick hack. I found Python is good for data structure, algorithm. B
: ut for text, perl is the best
:
: for
|
r****t
发帖数: 10904 | 6
for
C++ is under development forever, still few doubt it is worth learning.
【在 d*****l 的大作中提到】
: Is it worth learning?
: I feel that it's strong in string processing.
: But I found that its disadvantage is that there is no unified standards for
: a variety of open-source modules under development now.
|
