h****t
发帖数: 632 | 1 just some thought after i read alvardo's paper.
It seems symbolic interactionism has been widely applied and discussed in
sociology, not much in political science. Wendt(1992)'s constructivism and
his students' share similar insights with symbolic interactionism but they tend to
overemphasize norms of differences, give less attention to norms of common.Thus
it is not surprings that "cultural turn" gained some currency in IR, not
much in Comparative or American politics, and many political theor | s******1
发帖数: 239 | 2 It depends on the context: for instance, in American politics subfield, the
working assumption (context) is constant (institutions and political culture
are relatively stable), and so the focus is on those trivial issues of
political behavior; political culture could be an important approach in
comparative politics and IR (in CP it was hot several decades ago).
I predict that cultural approach will be more and more relevant in
comparative and IR because of the end of "the end of the History"...
【在 h****t 的大作中提到】
: just some thought after i read alvardo's paper.
: It seems symbolic interactionism has been widely applied and discussed in
: sociology, not much in political science. Wendt(1992)'s constructivism and
: his students' share similar insights with symbolic interactionism but they tend to
: overemphasize norms of differences, give less attention to norms of common.Thus
: it is not surprings that "cultural turn" gained some currency in IR, not
: much in Comparative or American politics, and many political theor
| a******o
发帖数: 1197 | 3 i guess some fields in political science pays attention to cultural facts:
rhetoric analysis, political theory, and the civil society debate.
tend to
.Thus
【在 h****t 的大作中提到】
: just some thought after i read alvardo's paper.
: It seems symbolic interactionism has been widely applied and discussed in
: sociology, not much in political science. Wendt(1992)'s constructivism and
: his students' share similar insights with symbolic interactionism but they tend to
: overemphasize norms of differences, give less attention to norms of common.Thus
: it is not surprings that "cultural turn" gained some currency in IR, not
: much in Comparative or American politics, and many political theor
| a******o
发帖数: 1197 | 4 but the "cultural turn" in history, anthropology, humanities and sociology
stays away from a concept of culture as a "norm" or "value." some neo-
functionalists stick to that although have come up with a more sophisticated
version of theory, for example, jeff alexander and philip smith
tend to
.Thus
【在 h****t 的大作中提到】
: just some thought after i read alvardo's paper.
: It seems symbolic interactionism has been widely applied and discussed in
: sociology, not much in political science. Wendt(1992)'s constructivism and
: his students' share similar insights with symbolic interactionism but they tend to
: overemphasize norms of differences, give less attention to norms of common.Thus
: it is not surprings that "cultural turn" gained some currency in IR, not
: much in Comparative or American politics, and many political theor
| h****t
发帖数: 632 | 5 Definately, but they seems not mainstream.
【在 a******o 的大作中提到】
: i guess some fields in political science pays attention to cultural facts:
: rhetoric analysis, political theory, and the civil society debate.
:
: tend to
: .Thus
|
|
