c****e
发帖数: 2097 | 1 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1274952/Men-ARE-brainy-women-says-
scientist-Professor-Richard-Lynn.html#ixzz0nbV9u6Oc
(enjoy, from the notorious Motl blog.)
Quote: For instance, at the near-genius level (an IQ of 145), brilliant men
outnumber brilliant women by 8 to
one. That's statistics, not sexism.
In this context, Professor Greenfield's indignation that only one in ten
science professors is female doesn't
seem all that bad. It also goes some way to explaining why, in almost 110
ye |
x********g
发帖数: 595 | 2 He is a very honest guy who never hesitates to tell the truth. You will
never find any stupid self-censored political correctness in his blog posts. |
z***i
发帖数: 1122 | 3 I don't buy it. Any time someone says a group is superior than another
because of brain size etc, I think about the Nazis who "proved" that Germans
> Southern Europeans > Eastern Europeans > Asians > Africans ...
BTW, why did Lubos Motl leave Harvard? How is he making money now? |
c****e
发帖数: 2097 | 4
It's not superiority I guess, it also says more men are stupider due to
shape of distribution.
Germans
about the Nazis, any historians look into the authenticity of their studies?
Did they really bother?
I am not an insider, so all I know is rumor.
【在 z***i 的大作中提到】
: I don't buy it. Any time someone says a group is superior than another
: because of brain size etc, I think about the Nazis who "proved" that Germans
: > Southern Europeans > Eastern Europeans > Asians > Africans ...
: BTW, why did Lubos Motl leave Harvard? How is he making money now?
|
x********g
发帖数: 595 | 5 What Nazis said is irrelevant to the subject discussed here. I don't see any
logical correlation between them.
Germans
【在 z***i 的大作中提到】
: I don't buy it. Any time someone says a group is superior than another
: because of brain size etc, I think about the Nazis who "proved" that Germans
: > Southern Europeans > Eastern Europeans > Asians > Africans ...
: BTW, why did Lubos Motl leave Harvard? How is he making money now?
|
z***i
发帖数: 1122 | 6 Professor Richard Lynn said in your article:
"These high-status males would also have been the most eligible mates, and
it would be their genes - chief among which would be those controlling male
brain size - that would be passed on to the next generation.
The result is that men today still have physically bigger brains than women,
even after adjustments for their different-body size. Might this underpin
the five-point difference in IQ between the sexes?"
Haven't we studied Einstein's brain alre
【在 x********g 的大作中提到】
: What Nazis said is irrelevant to the subject discussed here. I don't see any
: logical correlation between them.
:
: Germans
|
x********g
发帖数: 595 | 7 1)It's not my article.
2)did you notice the question mark at the end of the quoted paragraph?
Apparently, the author himself is not sure if the brain size plays a factor
or not. He is still in search of the answer to that question.
3)Keep in mind that the conclusions in the article are statistical in nature
. Nothing individual.
male
women,
man
【在 z***i 的大作中提到】
: Professor Richard Lynn said in your article:
: "These high-status males would also have been the most eligible mates, and
: it would be their genes - chief among which would be those controlling male
: brain size - that would be passed on to the next generation.
: The result is that men today still have physically bigger brains than women,
: even after adjustments for their different-body size. Might this underpin
: the five-point difference in IQ between the sexes?"
: Haven't we studied Einstein's brain alre
|
c****e
发帖数: 2097 | 8 you know, another thing is, not only men scientists are doing research in
that field. by all means, people
should object to wrong conclusions. do get data which states the opposite.
and unlike Nazis, men are not all trying to eliminate women or putting their
female colleagues in labor camps.
they do joke about them of course, that's unavoidable sometimes.
feminism is pretty lousy regardless though, it's just like what's been done
to the economic situation in african
countries. in academia, it's
【在 z***i 的大作中提到】
: Professor Richard Lynn said in your article:
: "These high-status males would also have been the most eligible mates, and
: it would be their genes - chief among which would be those controlling male
: brain size - that would be passed on to the next generation.
: The result is that men today still have physically bigger brains than women,
: even after adjustments for their different-body size. Might this underpin
: the five-point difference in IQ between the sexes?"
: Haven't we studied Einstein's brain alre
|
x********g
发帖数: 595 | 9 Exactly.
of but decreases the quality of the
average female scientist.
【在 c****e 的大作中提到】
: you know, another thing is, not only men scientists are doing research in
: that field. by all means, people
: should object to wrong conclusions. do get data which states the opposite.
: and unlike Nazis, men are not all trying to eliminate women or putting their
: female colleagues in labor camps.
: they do joke about them of course, that's unavoidable sometimes.
: feminism is pretty lousy regardless though, it's just like what's been done
: to the economic situation in african
: countries. in academia, it's
|
x********g
发帖数: 595 | 10 If you are a female physicist, I would say that, individually, you are as
capable as a typical male physicist. You have every reason to be proud of
yourself because you are good. And we male physicists are so glad to have
you around. However, as a group, you and other female colleagues are well
outnumbered by our male physicists. So it's natural that males contribute
much more to science than females. And it's natural that there are more male
physics professors, more male Nobel prize winners, mo
【在 z***i 的大作中提到】
: I don't buy it. Any time someone says a group is superior than another
: because of brain size etc, I think about the Nazis who "proved" that Germans
: > Southern Europeans > Eastern Europeans > Asians > Africans ...
: BTW, why did Lubos Motl leave Harvard? How is he making money now?
|
|
|
x******i
发帖数: 3022 | 11 This Professor is Confused.
The criterion for male eligibility is the size of penis, not the size of
brain.
male
women,
man
id=WTtTiG4eda0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=gould+mismeasure+of+man&cd=1#v=
onepage&q&f=false
【在 z***i 的大作中提到】
: Professor Richard Lynn said in your article:
: "These high-status males would also have been the most eligible mates, and
: it would be their genes - chief among which would be those controlling male
: brain size - that would be passed on to the next generation.
: The result is that men today still have physically bigger brains than women,
: even after adjustments for their different-body size. Might this underpin
: the five-point difference in IQ between the sexes?"
: Haven't we studied Einstein's brain alre
|
D******y
发帖数: 1296 | 12 which theory shows, the bigger the penis is, the more "productive" the man
is?
【在 x******i 的大作中提到】
: This Professor is Confused.
: The criterion for male eligibility is the size of penis, not the size of
: brain.
:
: male
: women,
: man
: id=WTtTiG4eda0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=gould+mismeasure+of+man&cd=1#v=
: onepage&q&f=false
|
N***m
发帖数: 4460 | 13 想来四喜教授的xi^4其实意指XL^4。超巨大够生猛的四维空间。
【在 D******y 的大作中提到】
: which theory shows, the bigger the penis is, the more "productive" the man
: is?
|
x********g
发帖数: 595 | 14 You guys are off topic. I will delete any future comments like those. |
c****e
发帖数: 2097 | 15 it's not easy to survive even these days if you have one and not the other
【在 x******i 的大作中提到】
: This Professor is Confused.
: The criterion for male eligibility is the size of penis, not the size of
: brain.
:
: male
: women,
: man
: id=WTtTiG4eda0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=gould+mismeasure+of+man&cd=1#v=
: onepage&q&f=false
|
x******i
发帖数: 3022 | 16 the Big Bang Theory
【在 D******y 的大作中提到】
: which theory shows, the bigger the penis is, the more "productive" the man
: is?
|
w****1
发帖数: 4931 | 17 Lubos is making money through advertisements on his blog. It is a shame that
he left academia. He was an
absolutely brilliant physicist. He left Harvard not because of physics, but
rather for his personal reasons. Not
only he would have been promoted at Harvard, to associate at least, he was
also offered a permanent job at
Perimeter institute, but he refused to take them.
【在 z***i 的大作中提到】
: Professor Richard Lynn said in your article:
: "These high-status males would also have been the most eligible mates, and
: it would be their genes - chief among which would be those controlling male
: brain size - that would be passed on to the next generation.
: The result is that men today still have physically bigger brains than women,
: even after adjustments for their different-body size. Might this underpin
: the five-point difference in IQ between the sexes?"
: Haven't we studied Einstein's brain alre
|
b****s
发帖数: 1300 | |
c****e
发帖数: 2097 | 19 “精英”多數都這水平
【在 b****s 的大作中提到】
: IQ接近但低于150其实挺悲惨的。
|
b****s
发帖数: 1300 | 20 不会吧？It们应该是<=130这一档的。
【在 c****e 的大作中提到】
: “精英”多數都這水平
|
c****e
发帖数: 2097 | 21 看錯一激素數
【在 b****s 的大作中提到】
: 不会吧？It们应该是<=130这一档的。
|
c****e
发帖数: 2097 | 22 看錯一激素數
【在 b****s 的大作中提到】
: 不会吧？It们应该是<=130这一档的。
|
