l*****8
发帖数: 16949 | 1 大意是其实中国一对选手输给丹麦就有让球的嫌疑。当然这个不是故意要输球，而是保
存体力为下一轮做准备。由此引起后来一连串闹剧。先是中国故意输给韩国。另一队韩
国于是故意想输给印尼。
李永波的小九九算得太精了。不过这次不小心搬起石头砸了自己的脚。
---------------------
shame on u, li yongbo
and koreans, indonesians, also.
but chinese should bear the most blame.
look at women doubles format 1st:
1/4: A1 vs C2; A2 vs C1; B1 vs D2; B2 vs D1
1/2: A1/C2 vs B1/D2
china have 2 pairs, each in A and D group, if both won group, they will only
meet in the final.
koreans also have 2, A and C. so they not as lucky as china, the pair in C
must either play A1 or A2, meaning either china's top seed wang/yu or their
own compatriots.
Indonesai only 1 in C.
1st let's put some blame on IBF, world badminton federation, and london
organizers:
1. group idea was bad, said to encourage weak players, so they can play more
. but this is agianst badminton's tradition, which almsot always is single
elimination, simple and straight forward.
2. 4 strong pairs, two chinese, 1 korean and 1 indonesians in A and C; while
denmark lone pair was in D. this means hard 1/4 final for those 4 asian
pairs, and rather easy one for denmark. again, europe's deep, dirty and dark
tradition of working against other continents. we already saw this in other
sports: gym, fencing, etc.
but these blemishes pale when compared to li and his chinese team.
if li want his two pairs only meeting in final, very simple, always play
hard and win every game.
all these changed with one game which was not much controversial, but
totally responsible for the following fiasco.
the other chinese pair tian/zhao was in D, lost to the denmark. tian/zhao
already qualified for 1/4 before that. they could have played hard and try
to win, if so, they were D1,and also would ahve eliminated the denmark one (
while a japan pair as D2 would qualify).
but they didn't. i didn't see the game video, the score was 22-20, 21-12.
looked like chinese fought hard in the first set, then gave up. the denamrk
pair was good, no certainty chinese could eaisly win. still there's strong
possibility chinese didn't play their best, so to save energy for 1/4.
anyway this totally changed scenario. i guess li's mind worked like this:
fine if our 2 pairs both win group. but maybe that will be hard as opponents
are strong, could waste lots of stamina. so when tian/zhao lost the 1st set
, li ordered them to give up.
why not take the easy way out, both losing and being A2 and D2?
so this lead to the disgusting farce we all know now:
yu/wang (A2) lost to korean pair1 (A1) in A. then korean team was also
despicable, they ordered their pair2 in C to lose, so two korean pairs would
play each other in 1/4, avoiding A2 the chinese.
this is not only disgusting, but also chicken. why they had no confidence of
playing chinese in 1/4, if their 2nd pair won group C, they would have a
chance to win gold and silver!
but as koreans and indonesians said, li started all these. li should take
the most blame.
shame, shame, shame! i don't care how good li did as head coach, but his
dirty and shameless ethics are simply in violation of all sports principles.
i would like to see him to be sacked after olympics. | a********l
发帖数: 39524 | 2 这肯定是中国人写的，谁给的干粮不明，码这么多字不易。 | Y******u
发帖数: 1090 | 3 这个说的有道理。问题是多年来这帮人一直就是这么干的。白沙在涅，与之俱黑。谴责
球员和教练的同时，羽联的责任不可不追究。 | l*****8
发帖数: 16949 | 4 谁写的我倒不在意。问题是说得有没有道理。
【在 a********l 的大作中提到】
: 这肯定是中国人写的，谁给的干粮不明，码这么多字不易。
| e****t
发帖数: 17914 | |
|
