y***n
发帖数: 2318 | 1 Will return the 24-105 for sure.
Was going to buy EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, though ran into the 15-85, and its
rating is 4.9 (vs the 17-55's 4.5), notice only few got 4.9 rating:
http://shop.usa.canon.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/subCategory
Also the price is cheaper. Just a little worried about the bigger zooming
range, as photo quality often goes the opposite with z-range.
How would you guys comment? | w*********t
发帖数: 928 | 2 啥body呀
its
【在 y***n 的大作中提到】
: Will return the 24-105 for sure.
: Was going to buy EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, though ran into the 15-85, and its
: rating is 4.9 (vs the 17-55's 4.5), notice only few got 4.9 rating:
: http://shop.usa.canon.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/subCategory
: Also the price is cheaper. Just a little worried about the bigger zooming
: range, as photo quality often goes the opposite with z-range.
: How would you guys comment?
| b********6
发帖数: 35437 | 3 你应该去看dpreview的评分，而不是看amazon的用户评分 | y***n
发帖数: 2318 | 4 Those ratings are from Canon website, made by buyers, and looks they're
pretty right, i.e., the 70-200 f4L IS gets 5 out 5, and 24-105 only gets 4.6.
Amazon ratings are almost no use, most raters are amateurish.
【在 b********6 的大作中提到】
: 你应该去看dpreview的评分，而不是看amazon的用户评分
| t********8
发帖数: 14817 | 5 get17-55 is or 70-200L is | y***n
发帖数: 2318 | 6 EF-S is for APC-S body only.
【在 w*********t 的大作中提到】
: 啥body呀
:
: its
| b********6
发帖数: 35437 | 7 why do you think rating from canon is reliable?
.6.
【在 y***n 的大作中提到】
: Those ratings are from Canon website, made by buyers, and looks they're
: pretty right, i.e., the 70-200 f4L IS gets 5 out 5, and 24-105 only gets 4.6.
: Amazon ratings are almost no use, most raters are amateurish.
:
| y***n
发帖数: 2318 | 8 Have 70-200, and really love it...need to decide if buy 17-55, heard dust
gets into it pretty easily.
【在 t********8 的大作中提到】
: get17-55 is or 70-200L is
| y***n
发帖数: 2318 | 9 Don't see any trace of fabrications - the ratings are consistent with other
sites such as http://www.photozone.de. In addition, as mentioned, very few get 4.9, and even less get 5.
Was going to buy the 17-55, but from the reviews, looks like it gets dust
quick, and not good at longevity.
【在 b********6 的大作中提到】
: why do you think rating from canon is reliable?
:
: .6.
|
|
