s******e
发帖数: 1985 | 1 The mean of total income in USA is $155200.
Is it real? Unblievalbe ya!
Only CEOs and managers do the survey? |
B****a
发帖数: 1526 | 2 mean is meaningless, everyone knows the graph is skewed to the right;
median should be used
【在 s******e 的大作中提到】
: The mean of total income in USA is $155200.
: Is it real? Unblievalbe ya!
: Only CEOs and managers do the survey?
|
c**p
发帖数: 1443 | 3 median from the survey is $125,000.
is it real? still unbelivable high.
【在 B****a 的大作中提到】
: mean is meaningless, everyone knows the graph is skewed to the right;
: median should be used
|
h*****t
发帖数: 1226 | 4 Whether these included employer paid benefits. if it did, $125k is about
right
【在 c**p 的大作中提到】
: median from the survey is $125,000.
: is it real? still unbelivable high.
|
s******e
发帖数: 1985 | 5 None of my friends working in big Pharm (20+) higher than $100k.
【在 h*****t 的大作中提到】
: Whether these included employer paid benefits. if it did, $125k is about
: right
|
s******e
发帖数: 1985 | 6 But the survey only open to AAPS members, most of people are not AAPS
members.
Still there are tons of students and postdocs who may just ignore the survey.
I think this survey is highly biased toward the high end. They should not
published this survey result at all.
【在 s******e 的大作中提到】
: None of my friends working in big Pharm (20+) higher than $100k.
|
s*****l
发帖数: 1844 | 7 Let me explain this:
1) Not too many companies are willing to sponsor their employees to AAPS,
which can easily cost several thousand dollars. People who go to AAPS are
probably above average.
2) People tend to report somewhat higher income when they are doing this
type of survey.
3) This is mean, not median. In fact, this number is not surprising. Also
consider people who have been working for 20-30 years.
4) Even 150K is not much if you live in SF, Boston, NJ etc.
The problem to many people is that their positions are not secure. Once
laid off, getting a comparable position may be very tough.
【在 s******e 的大作中提到】
: The mean of total income in USA is $155200.
: Is it real? Unblievalbe ya!
: Only CEOs and managers do the survey?
|
s*****l
发帖数: 1844 | 8 Are you sure? Or you are still very young, and relatively green to the area?
Phd entry level can reach 80-90k base salary in many big phara, or even
higher. Total salary passing 100k is not so difficult.
【在 s******e 的大作中提到】
: None of my friends working in big Pharm (20+) higher than $100k.
|
c*******g
发帖数: 695 | 9 Very surprised that only 25% earns <$94000
【在 s******e 的大作中提到】
: None of my friends working in big Pharm (20+) higher than $100k.
|
l******g
发帖数: 1623 | 10 弓虽！知道那么多朋友的薪水
你的朋友是不是都在一家公司？这样没有代表性。10万应该是大多数公司entry level
PhD scientist的工资 或者中老年RA
的工资吧
【在 s******e 的大作中提到】
: None of my friends working in big Pharm (20+) higher than $100k.
|
|
|
c**p
发帖数: 1443 | 11 Wyeth PhD. entry level is senior scientist 1.
Wyeth's senior scientist 2 cap is $99k at pearl river site (30miles out of
NYC).
level
【在 l******g 的大作中提到】
: 弓虽！知道那么多朋友的薪水
: 你的朋友是不是都在一家公司？这样没有代表性。10万应该是大多数公司entry level
: PhD scientist的工资 或者中老年RA
: 的工资吧
|
y**g
发帖数: 197 | 12 I just applied an entry level job and was given the oral offer, I asked for
a base $90k. HR approved it without ANY hesitation. So, 90k--100k is
reasonable number for entry level PhD. |
N***n
发帖数: 660 | 13 牛！发包子吧
for
【在 y**g 的大作中提到】
: I just applied an entry level job and was given the oral offer, I asked for
: a base $90k. HR approved it without ANY hesitation. So, 90k--100k is
: reasonable number for entry level PhD.
|
y**g
发帖数: 197 | 14 没包子。药厂基本都这价。
【在 N***n 的大作中提到】
: 牛！发包子吧
:
: for
|
w********g
发帖数: 447 | 15 因为你们是稀缺工种，可以随便叫价。
【在 y**g 的大作中提到】
: 没包子。药厂基本都这价。
|
y**g
发帖数: 197 | 16 现在还有稀缺工种？以前我们这毕业的学生95k--100k.
【在 w********g 的大作中提到】
: 因为你们是稀缺工种，可以随便叫价。
|
A2
发帖数: 588 | 17 I thougt postions in big pharma are generally quite stable.
【在 s*****l 的大作中提到】
: Let me explain this:
: 1) Not too many companies are willing to sponsor their employees to AAPS,
: which can easily cost several thousand dollars. People who go to AAPS are
: probably above average.
: 2) People tend to report somewhat higher income when they are doing this
: type of survey.
: 3) This is mean, not median. In fact, this number is not surprising. Also
: consider people who have been working for 20-30 years.
: 4) Even 150K is not much if you live in SF, Boston, NJ etc.
: The problem to many people is that their positions are not secure. Once
|
k****o
发帖数: 589 | 18
for
请问你具体是做哪个方向的?
【在 y**g 的大作中提到】
: I just applied an entry level job and was given the oral offer, I asked for
: a base $90k. HR approved it without ANY hesitation. So, 90k--100k is
: reasonable number for entry level PhD.
|
F*****y
发帖数: 100 | 19 MEAN的话也有可能.现在BIG PHARMA都是TOP HEAVY. 管理层一大堆. 我们公司的管理层
,如果加奖金的话,最低也应该有接近$140K了,高的就不说了.做技术的PHD闷加奖金也都
差不多$120-130K. 如果算401,BENEFIT那就更靠谱了.
【在 s******e 的大作中提到】
: The mean of total income in USA is $155200.
: Is it real? Unblievalbe ya!
: Only CEOs and managers do the survey?
|
j*******y
发帖数: 58 | 20 The mean doesn't tell the true story.
for a detailed report
http://www.aaps.org/publications/newsmagazine/2001/Dec01/15_sal
In conclusion, the typical AAPS
member, as portrayed by the
respondents to this survey, is a
43-year-old male holding a
Ph.D. and working in the pharmaceutical
industry with 16
years of experience. He earns a
base annual salary of $114,200
per year and enjoyed an
increase of 9.3% over his 1999
salary.
【在 c**p 的大作中提到】
: median from the survey is $125,000.
: is it real? still unbelivable high.
|
c*******u
发帖数: 88 | 21 nowadays even their counterparts can make 80-90k usd in China, why can't
they make 120k in the U.S.? |
k********s
发帖数: 320 | 22 All of them are at entry levels?
【在 s******e 的大作中提到】
: None of my friends working in big Pharm (20+) higher than $100k.
|
