B****n
发帖数: 1876 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Chemistry 讨论区 】
发信人: Bergen (新州老流氓), 信区: Chemistry
标 题: GC experts please come in
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Mar 22 15:34:15 2007)
Hi guys,
I need to make a decision on which vender to buy GC from, Agilent or Varian?
(Shimadzu is out of my table. Bad experience!)
I have a complicated process stream to be analyzed by GC. So I need
sophisticated application customization for the GC system.
Both Agilent and Varian offer customizations that they claim will work.
Agilent is using a third party fo | b**u
发帖数: 2761 | 2 i used shimadzu GC for quite a long time, and it worked fine.
Varian?
【在 B****n 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Chemistry 讨论区 】
: 发信人: Bergen (新州老流氓), 信区: Chemistry
: 标 题: GC experts please come in
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Mar 22 15:34:15 2007)
: Hi guys,
: I need to make a decision on which vender to buy GC from, Agilent or Varian?
: (Shimadzu is out of my table. Bad experience!)
: I have a complicated process stream to be analyzed by GC. So I need
: sophisticated application customization for the GC system.
: Both Agilent and Varian offer customizations that they claim will work.
| A*****s
发帖数: 813 | 3 shimadzu的GC应该是老大啊，他还非不要
【在 b**u 的大作中提到】
: i used shimadzu GC for quite a long time, and it worked fine.
:
: Varian?
| b**u
发帖数: 2761 | 4 Really? Didn't know this, I thought Varian was better. Or they are just good
at GC/MS?
【在 A*****s 的大作中提到】
: shimadzu的GC应该是老大啊，他还非不要
|
|
