S*******s
发帖数: 13043 | 1 儿子做题，要求判断一句话是fact还是opinion。我试图解释，结果发现解释不了。主
观/客观？陈述/解释？即使能让我明白用什么方式让孩子明白？ | k******s
发帖数: 237 | 2 Fact: no matter who said it, it is always true, like 1 + 1 = 2;
opinion: change depend on who said it. for example, judge beautiful or not.
什么题？ | J*******p
发帖数: 1129 | 3 你娃几岁？年龄不到，有些抽象的概念孩子很难理解。 | S*******s
发帖数: 13043 | 4 google了一下，发现这个问题对于5岁孩子其实没有我想的那么复杂，用不着考虑本体
论主观客观终极真理不可知论。类似于“进化论”、“牛顿第二定律”这种陈述是不会
出现在他的题里面的，用不着自己难为自己。
【在 J*******p 的大作中提到】
: 你娃几岁？年龄不到，有些抽象的概念孩子很难理解。
| S*******s
发帖数: 13043 | 5 thanks. is it what taught in school?
it is a bunch of statements in a reading book, such as "in a year there are
365 days", "butterflies are beautiful"
not.
【在 k******s 的大作中提到】
: Fact: no matter who said it, it is always true, like 1 + 1 = 2;
: opinion: change depend on who said it. for example, judge beautiful or not.
: 什么题？
| J*******p
发帖数: 1129 | 6
are
噢，明白了。
But won't this kind of stuff simply confuse little 5, 6 year olds? To them,
"butterflies are beautiful" could be seen as a fact. In my humble opinion,
this kind of perception of little kids is developmentally appropriate.
【在 S*******s 的大作中提到】
: thanks. is it what taught in school?
: it is a bunch of statements in a reading book, such as "in a year there are
: 365 days", "butterflies are beautiful"
:
: not.
| S*******s
发帖数: 13043 | 7 guess you are right. mostly I asked this question here was to enlighten
myself. as for my son, just do whatever he can.
,
【在 J*******p 的大作中提到】
:
: are
: 噢，明白了。
: But won't this kind of stuff simply confuse little 5, 6 year olds? To them,
: "butterflies are beautiful" could be seen as a fact. In my humble opinion,
: this kind of perception of little kids is developmentally appropriate.
|
|
