p*******m
发帖数: 20761 | 1 Closing Thoughts
With disappointing wireless performance and only one of the three wired
routing benchmarks measurable, it's no wonder the OnHub ranks #10 out of 10
AC1900 class routers in our current Router Ranker. Please keep in mind that
these results were obtained with band-edge channels 1 for 2.4 GHz and 36 for
5 GHz instead of our normal center-band channels 6 and 153. Band-edge
channels often have slightly lower power to meet certain FCC limits, so that
could have skewed the results. The bottom line here is, despite other
reviewers' reports to the contrary, the OnHub is unlikely to knock your Wi-
Fi socks off.
As this review was being posted, Google offered a special test image that
should allow running our full set of tests. Stay tuned for a upcoming retest
article in a week or so.
Much OnHub coverage has touched upon concerns about letting Google be at the
heart of your network. It's also a favorite topic for reader comment and
forum conspiracy rants. Google is trying to address the concern directly via
this help topic that describes the data collected and how to opt out. If
you're among those of us who like to trust, but verify, just wait awhile. I'
m sure hackers are already sniffing OnHub traffic to see if Google is really
walking the talk and will scream bloody murder if they find anything
untoward.
I'm not worried about OnHub sniffing network traffic. Google's AdSense
beacons and cookies already know plenty about our internet travels and its
ubiquitous search box adds even more to our online profiles. OnHub is more
interested in learning about your Wi-Fi environment, most likely to improve
its Location Services. But you can opt-out of that too, by appending _nomap
to your Wi-Fi network name (SSID).
In the end, Google's OnHub is a pretty-to-look-at AC1900 router with
disappointing wireless performance that takes an appliance approach to
handling your network. You just plug it in, set a network name and security
key and let it worry about how to connect all your wireless gadgets and keep
them running smoothly.
If you are a router geek, don't even bother. You're going to hate OnHub. For
those who regard wireless routers as a necessary evil and just want them to
work, only time will tell if Google has the keys to that kingdom. | a*f
发帖数: 5682 | 2 我在用。比我原来的华硕150刀router强一个数量级。
10
that
for
that
【在 p*******m 的大作中提到】
: Closing Thoughts
: With disappointing wireless performance and only one of the three wired
: routing benchmarks measurable, it's no wonder the OnHub ranks #10 out of 10
: AC1900 class routers in our current Router Ranker. Please keep in mind that
: these results were obtained with band-edge channels 1 for 2.4 GHz and 36 for
: 5 GHz instead of our normal center-band channels 6 and 153. Band-edge
: channels often have slightly lower power to meet certain FCC limits, so that
: could have skewed the results. The bottom line here is, despite other
: reviewers' reports to the contrary, the OnHub is unlikely to knock your Wi-
: Fi socks off.
| s******s
发帖数: 3694 | 3 转这种文章，又没有什么具体的对比数据，意义在啥地方呢？
狗这个路由器好不好用不知道，但是WiFi/SoC的规格(QCOMM)绝对是当前最牛逼之一了
，这个设备连接量很有吸引力，128（？）做商业路由器都够了，吊丝很难理解为什么
家里需要连接这么多设备，Google他妈的配合光纤服务下大棋？
【在 a*f 的大作中提到】
: 我在用。比我原来的华硕150刀router强一个数量级。
:
: 10
: that
: for
: that
| k***e
发帖数: 7933 | 4 设备连接量现在越来越重要，平时都有十几个设备连接
有聚会的时候需要很多，我的神油已经很很吃力
【在 s******s 的大作中提到】
: 转这种文章，又没有什么具体的对比数据，意义在啥地方呢？
: 狗这个路由器好不好用不知道，但是WiFi/SoC的规格(QCOMM)绝对是当前最牛逼之一了
: ，这个设备连接量很有吸引力，128（？）做商业路由器都够了，吊丝很难理解为什么
: 家里需要连接这么多设备，Google他妈的配合光纤服务下大棋？
|
|
