O******n
发帖数: 1505 | 1 Fifth313ment 11 hours ago
This review is a journalist joke Engadget:
My favorite is that if you go back and read Engadget's own HTC EVO 4G
LTE review the EVO LTE gets bashed for it's own 2-tone back side
(polycarbonate/anodized aluminum) calling it a "mish-mash of materials
lining the back of the phone"! In the iPhone 5 review the same 2-tone
back side (glass/anodized or raw aluminum) is the "hallmark of design"
and "These glossy bands break up the matte uniformity, but help boost
antenna performance"! What was it doing on the EVO LTE? The small
polycarbonate area covering the back of the EVO LTE was there to serve
as an antenna pass through for better signal range and to protect the
camera lens.
Engadget where are the performance benchmarks, screen comparisons (3G,
4, 4S, HOX, GSN, SGS3, etc) or camera shootouts? They also don't make
any mention of a missing hardware shutter button on the iPhone 5, which
they mention and bash just about every Android phone for not having?
As for battery performance the EVO LTE only made 9 hours of battery life
in Engadget's review, however, my EVO LTE gets a full 24+ hours with 5+
hours of screen time (and many other review sites gave the EVO LTE much
better battery scores)! And most of the time I make 2+ days with less
screen time! On the iPhone 5 "tests" reveal that Engadget is getting 14+
hours of battery life when NOT ONE OTHER REVIEW has anywhere near that
result, on GSM test models no less (CDMA models usually do worse on
battery)! Oh and if you're keeping score at home Engadget also bashed
the EVO LTE for having an internal battery, which is mentioned no where
in the iPhone 5 review.
As for the screen Engadget says, "The new height results in a phone with
more usable space and better presentation for HD content (the iPhone is
finally 16:9)." Now anyone who doesn't know any better would think the
iPhone 5 has an HD screen due to that sentence and no where in the
article do they mention that the screen is not HD! They do mention the
iPhone's resolution but most users don't understand how to read XxX
units? They figure if they say HD enough (FaceTime HD, HD content) it
will propagate the readers mind and they will just believe it's true?!
And finally (I can think of 50 more but I'll limit my post to these)
when mentioning the wireless connectivity options on the iPhone 5 the
way Engadget words the CDMA vs GSM paragraph would leave any non-tech
user thinking that CDMA networks (Verizon & Sprint) can't do
simultaneous voice and data, which we know isn't true as the SGS3, EVO
LTE, Viper, etc all support this! You don't mention that this is a flaw
of the iPhone 5 and users are left thinking that their carriers are
inferior!? At one point in the review Engadget tried to make it seem
like the Android LTE phones would get the same or slower speeds than the
iPhone 5 ("Data transmission speeds were at or above comparable Android
LTE devices!").
I've never seen such a review in which Engadget panders to Apple in
every way! I'm surprised Engadget didn't bring up the argument (as many
retail & grocery stores explain products getting smaller by placing them
in larger appearing containers) that the iPhone 5 has a smaller 4 inch
screen so that it will fit better into your hand during calls! Maybe I
missed it? Pure pandering crap! | x****c
发帖数: 25662 | 2 engadget就是一群恶心果轮。
跟wsj那个老头一个样。 |
|
