d*********r
发帖数: 227 | 1 从工程师起家,做到Qualcomm QCT的president,光吹牛是不行的.
此人算是个狠角色,他负责的项目从不delay,总是按时deliver. 但是认人为亲,提拔了
不少老印,而且明显偏袒. 下面的人多有怨言.
他去之前moto就快入土了, 他去了之后拍板上android, 所以又苟延残喘了一段时间.
说他搞垮,没什么说服力. | w*****g
发帖数: 16352 | 2 任人唯亲是老印的通病。
【在 d*********r 的大作中提到】
: 从工程师起家,做到Qualcomm QCT的president,光吹牛是不行的.
: 此人算是个狠角色,他负责的项目从不delay,总是按时deliver. 但是认人为亲,提拔了
: 不少老印,而且明显偏袒. 下面的人多有怨言.
: 他去之前moto就快入土了, 他去了之后拍板上android, 所以又苟延残喘了一段时间.
: 说他搞垮,没什么说服力.
| c********l
发帖数: 8138 | 3 任人唯亲，按照目前的趋势，不是什么错。
老中在这种大环境下，只有跟着做，才是出路
【在 w*****g 的大作中提到】
: 任人唯亲是老印的通病。
| h*e
发帖数: 10233 | 4 这方面我们公司还不错。一堆一堆的中国人，有一个modeling组除了director是美国人
，下面几十号人全部是中国人。中国人就得这么干才有出路。 | F******k
发帖数: 7375 | 5 求推荐。。。
人 ，下面几十号人全部是中国人。中国人就得这么干才有出路。
【在 h*e 的大作中提到】
: 这方面我们公司还不错。一堆一堆的中国人，有一个modeling组除了director是美国人
: ，下面几十号人全部是中国人。中国人就得这么干才有出路。
| C*********Q
发帖数: 348 | 6 他去moto的原因是不爽Q的CEO,他觉得它有本事代替之。
【在 d*********r 的大作中提到】
: 从工程师起家,做到Qualcomm QCT的president,光吹牛是不行的.
: 此人算是个狠角色,他负责的项目从不delay,总是按时deliver. 但是认人为亲,提拔了
: 不少老印,而且明显偏袒. 下面的人多有怨言.
: 他去之前moto就快入土了, 他去了之后拍板上android, 所以又苟延残喘了一段时间.
: 说他搞垮,没什么说服力.
| w*******s
发帖数: 980 | 7 说的是moto的前CTO，Padmasree Warrior。把Moto搞的奄奄一息，sales declined by
more than $4 billion。 她跳槽到Cisco了。看看Cisco现在怎么样。
把一个公司搞垮不算牛，搞垮两个才牛，搞垮两个还升官就更牛了。
【在 d*********r 的大作中提到】
: 从工程师起家,做到Qualcomm QCT的president,光吹牛是不行的.
: 此人算是个狠角色,他负责的项目从不delay,总是按时deliver. 但是认人为亲,提拔了
: 不少老印,而且明显偏袒. 下面的人多有怨言.
: 他去之前moto就快入土了, 他去了之后拍板上android, 所以又苟延残喘了一段时间.
: 说他搞垮,没什么说服力.
| z**r
发帖数: 17771 | 8 这就是谣言了，Padmasree Warrior哪有什么本事搞垮这，那的，在cisco属于连话都说
不上的，你可真高看她
by
【在 w*******s 的大作中提到】
: 说的是moto的前CTO，Padmasree Warrior。把Moto搞的奄奄一息，sales declined by
: more than $4 billion。 她跳槽到Cisco了。看看Cisco现在怎么样。
: 把一个公司搞垮不算牛，搞垮两个才牛，搞垮两个还升官就更牛了。
| w*****u
发帖数: 4768 | 9 任人唯亲
应该是对于海外打拼的老中绝对是优点。。。 | w*******s
发帖数: 980 | 10 I know a lot Moto people were very happy about her leaving in 2007.
I am not Cisco insider but CTO in a technology company is always an
important role and she was promoted again last year
http://blogs.cisco.com/news/cto-padmasree-warrior-to-lead-cisco
CTO Padmasree Warrior To Lead Cisco Enterprise, Commercial and Small Biz
Development Team
-----------------------
This is the heart of Cisco’s business and we are fortunate to have the
talent of an (ahem) warrior take over this industry leading team of over 10,
000 world-class engineering talent.
说不上的，你可真高看她
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: 这就是谣言了，Padmasree Warrior哪有什么本事搞垮这，那的，在cisco属于连话都说
: 不上的，你可真高看她
:
: by
| | | z**r
发帖数: 17771 | 11 在cisco属于鸡肋的东西，她连个EVP都不是，就一个SVP。别以为名称是个CTO就以为是
啥，连cisco核心的5大优先级都拍不进去，你觉得她能搞垮cisco？
10,
【在 w*******s 的大作中提到】
: I know a lot Moto people were very happy about her leaving in 2007.
: I am not Cisco insider but CTO in a technology company is always an
: important role and she was promoted again last year
: http://blogs.cisco.com/news/cto-padmasree-warrior-to-lead-cisco
: CTO Padmasree Warrior To Lead Cisco Enterprise, Commercial and Small Biz
: Development Team
: -----------------------
: This is the heart of Cisco’s business and we are fortunate to have the
: talent of an (ahem) warrior take over this industry leading team of over 10,
: 000 world-class engineering talent.
| s********i
发帖数: 17328 | 12 sometimes it is the company culture. if people like her get promoted,
then you know the future of the company.
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: 在cisco属于鸡肋的东西，她连个EVP都不是，就一个SVP。别以为名称是个CTO就以为是
: 啥，连cisco核心的5大优先级都拍不进去，你觉得她能搞垮cisco？
:
: 10,
| k*****a
发帖数: 7389 | 13 此人算是个狠角色,他负责的项目从不delay??
very eay to do it in an A3 style sweatshop | r*****r
发帖数: 867 | 14 very good point!
【在 s********i 的大作中提到】
: sometimes it is the company culture. if people like her get promoted,
: then you know the future of the company.
| m*****3
发帖数: 55 | 15 Ed Zander 才是搞垮moto的第一功臣啊，此人是个超级大忽悠。刚从SUN跳过去时RAZR
刚准备上，吃了两年老本，放了个1000天赶超NOKIA的卫星，什么实事都没干，活活把
moto给搞垮了。给赶下台前还给员工发了电邮，例举自己的achievement，脸皮之后难
以置信！ | m*****3
发帖数: 55 | 16 在moto和cisco这种公司，CTO的确没什么实权。Padmasree在moto那会儿也就管个
software group和几个lab吧，直接后果就是外包了无数个项目去老家。此人还喜欢写
blog，iphone问世时洋洋洒洒例举了iphone的N大缺点。。。她也算是给赶下台的吧，
好像无声无息的突然就从moto消失了，连个email都没让发 | m*****3
发帖数: 55 | 17 Padmasree Warrior - Motorola Executive Vice President and Chief Technology
Officer
iPhone, uPhone, We all Phone!
January 10, 2007
Lights, camera, action!
As worshippers come out of the heady, enthralling, grandstand production
called Macworld, the hype settles and reality sets in. It's called "the
morning after"!
Many people ask me what I think about Apple's announcement of the iPhone. If
you are one of those, here is my opinion. If you are not, my apologies for
making you read yet another post on the much-anticipated Apple iPhone.
First, I am thrilled that an innovative tech company like Apple finally
decided to "join the club" and build a cell phone with multimedia. I have
always been a fan of Apple's creativity and cache for the cool factor. It is
great for the mobile industry to have an icon like Steve Jobs stand up and
say that it took his company over 2 years to build a multimedia cell phone!
It just goes to show how complex it is to get into this business. The photos
and pictures of Apple iPhone did not disappoint me. I expected nothing less
from the likes of Jonathan Ive. Disclosures - I am a Jonathan Ive fan, I
have owned an iPod since early launch, and I am a nut for cool gadgets.
I am also delighted because Apple's announcement validates what I have
always believed - mobility will change the world and transform
communications, computing and entertainment. At Motorola, we call this
vision, "Seamless Mobility" for the Mobile Me.
Having said that, here are my morning-after doubts:
1. Touch screens have been around for a long time. I wonder how practical
users will find this on a "phone". There is a huge difference in the
usability between a portable media player that you can put in a pretty case
and carry on your hip versus a mobile phone that you constantly take in and
out of your pocket or purse, hold up to your face, drop on the floor many
times in the course of a day! Smudges, scratches and breakage are big issues
. Let us hope we don't have to spend more money and carry special cleaning
lotion and buff cloth as accessories!
2. There is nothing revolutionary or disruptive about any of the
technologies. Touch interface, movement sensors, accelerometer, morphing,
gesture recognition, 2-megapixel camera, built in MP3 player, WiFi,
Bluetooth, are already available in products from leaders in the mobile
industry - Motorola, Nokia and Samsung. So, what appears to be the initial
pricing at $499 and $599 with a minimum 2 year service agreement seems a
stretch.
3. Battery life is problematic. User experience will be compromised with a
mere 5 hours of talk time, and what about standby time? Speaking from over
20 years experience building products for the mobile industry, power
management in mobiles is a non-trivial problem!
4. At a time when the entire industry is moving to 3G, UMTS, HSDPA, 1x EV-DO
and WiMax for wireless broadband, why launch an "internet device" on a 2.5G
EDGE network? It is weird to me that high-speed over-the-air data access is
under-leveraged. I am also puzzled as to how this will increase ARPU for
the service provider, how will it drive traffic onto their high-speed
networks? IMO, a super way for Apple to differentiate itself would have been
snappy over-the-air music and video download and synch.
5. I am not sure about the lack of a keyboard. Remember most people use a
cell phone to make calls, especially when they are driving. I reserve
judgment on how easy this will be for making calls or texting while we are
moving at high speeds.
6. Is 4GB or 8GB of embedded memory necessary on a mobile, especially when
you can have a cheaper option with an expansion slot that allows the
consumer to add the memory and pay for it separately if they need it?
7. Lastly, when you have billions of devices - is a closed, proprietary
system the right strategy? What happens to the operator's differentiation
with branded services? Is this signaling a sea change in the service
provider's mark on the UI?
As always, Apple raises the bar with a compelling concept; and this time to
enhance the vision of Seamless Mobility for the Mobile Me - which I welcome.
Stay tuned for other great products from others and us in the mobile
industry! The race continues. | g****t
发帖数: 31659 | 18 就这一条说对了
20 years experience building products for the mobile industry, power
management in mobiles is a non-trivial problem!
真不容易.
If
for
【在 m*****3 的大作中提到】
: Padmasree Warrior - Motorola Executive Vice President and Chief Technology
: Officer
: iPhone, uPhone, We all Phone!
: January 10, 2007
: Lights, camera, action!
: As worshippers come out of the heady, enthralling, grandstand production
: called Macworld, the hype settles and reality sets in. It's called "the
: morning after"!
: Many people ask me what I think about Apple's announcement of the iPhone. If
: you are one of those, here is my opinion. If you are not, my apologies for
| s*****y
发帖数: 66 | 19 在上升的公司，菜鸟也可以成名，在下降的公司，在牛也是个熊
这个世界上，steve jobs 只有一个，9算 bill gates来，微软也不
能想今天苹果这样。很多CEO都是摆设，其不到什么作用， 当然
自家开公司的，随便怎么玩。
【在 d*********r 的大作中提到】
: 从工程师起家,做到Qualcomm QCT的president,光吹牛是不行的.
: 此人算是个狠角色,他负责的项目从不delay,总是按时deliver. 但是认人为亲,提拔了
: 不少老印,而且明显偏袒. 下面的人多有怨言.
: 他去之前moto就快入土了, 他去了之后拍板上android, 所以又苟延残喘了一段时间.
: 说他搞垮,没什么说服力.
| d****u
发帖数: 272 | 20 "他去了之后拍板上android" - not true, the decision to double down on android
was made before he was picked as the CEO.
【在 d*********r 的大作中提到】
: 从工程师起家,做到Qualcomm QCT的president,光吹牛是不行的.
: 此人算是个狠角色,他负责的项目从不delay,总是按时deliver. 但是认人为亲,提拔了
: 不少老印,而且明显偏袒. 下面的人多有怨言.
: 他去之前moto就快入土了, 他去了之后拍板上android, 所以又苟延残喘了一段时间.
: 说他搞垮,没什么说服力.
|
|
