s******a
发帖数: 517 | 1 像一团浆糊，好比受潮的喷墨打印稿，或新装的linux上中文网效果，笔画都糊在一起
了。
比Android和WM都差得多。
当然，因为英文字体笔画简单，浆糊感没那么明显。 | C*********a
发帖数: 696 | 2 低dpi就这个德行, ip4改进了, ipad/ipad2还是一样差
【在 s******a 的大作中提到】
: 像一团浆糊，好比受潮的喷墨打印稿，或新装的linux上中文网效果，笔画都糊在一起
: 了。
: 比Android和WM都差得多。
: 当然，因为英文字体笔画简单，浆糊感没那么明显。
| s******a
发帖数: 517 | 3 连最老的WM手机都比它好得多，不是dpi的问题，是显示理念的问题！
我找到了一段解释：
Apple generally believes that the goal of the algorithm should be to
preserve the design of the typeface as much as possible, even at the cost of
a little bit of blurriness.
Microsoft generally believes that the shape of each letter should be
hammered into pixel boundaries to prevent blur and improve readability, even
at the cost of not being true to the typeface.
我这么理解：
Apple假设你在屏幕上看到的必须与打印出来的比例一致，否则会找它麻烦，所以宁愿
牺牲显示清晰度；
Microsoft着重屏幕显示效果，笔画在LCD的物理格点上，尽管这样打印出来有些许偏差；
请问烂苹果，难道我上网是为了打印吗？
【在 C*********a 的大作中提到】
: 低dpi就这个德行, ip4改进了, ipad/ipad2还是一样差
| r**m
发帖数: 1825 | 4 http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2007/06/12.html
The advantage of Microsoft's method is that it works better for on-screen
reading.
of
even
【在 s******a 的大作中提到】
: 连最老的WM手机都比它好得多，不是dpi的问题，是显示理念的问题！
: 我找到了一段解释：
: Apple generally believes that the goal of the algorithm should be to
: preserve the design of the typeface as much as possible, even at the cost of
: a little bit of blurriness.
: Microsoft generally believes that the shape of each letter should be
: hammered into pixel boundaries to prevent blur and improve readability, even
: at the cost of not being true to the typeface.
: 我这么理解：
: Apple假设你在屏幕上看到的必须与打印出来的比例一致，否则会找它麻烦，所以宁愿
|
|
