h*********n
发帖数: 11319 | 1 最接近的是这个，简直可以作为reference case
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Timothy_Stansbury
同样是NYPD，同样是高危地区巡逻，开门的时候意外开枪，同样是黑人丧生. 大陪审团
最后没有起诉
一个区别：事件发生在housing project的屋顶上，能见度比梁警官面对的漆黑楼梯间
好得多
还有一个更发指的case
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BART_Police_shooting_of_Oscar_Gran
SFPD在一车乘客目击之下，从背后击毙已经被拷在地上的嫌犯。最后二级谋杀不成立，
意外杀人罪判了个6个月
最后是一个最近的case
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Eric_Garner
警察在逮捕过程中用锁喉，身体不适的小贩多次抗议无效最后活活憋死。大陪审团最后
也没有起诉
现在检察官以2级谋杀指控Peter Liang，而且大陪审团居然也起诉了。这不是纯扯么？
梁警官案和case 1有什么区别？最大的区别就是梁警官不属于White Boy club。
更扯的是还有某些华人觉得起诉梁警官很正当，华人同胞不应该抗辩，不应该挺他。
甚至，甚至还有人担心支持梁警官会造成其他种族反弹对自己不利， 跳出来指责别人
“丢了华人的脸”
掩耳盗铃如此，猥琐程度当真突破了我的下限 | p******e
发帖数: 17163 | 2 grand jury is just a bunch of idiot like us. their decision is pretty random
. and they only face a binary decision, whether there is a case to be made,
unlike the actual trial, they are not saying liang is guilty, they just
saying he maybe and so he need to stand on trial.
I think liang just got into this in a terrible timing. after wat happen in
ferguson and watever happen to that cigarette selling guy. those on the
grand jury just like us, were all reminded of how bad police brutality can
go...
if I were on the grand jury that day and if it was any officer other than a
Chinese, I probably would've vote for a move to get the case on trial too,
simply cuz I don't know if his guilty or not. just like them officer who
choke te cigarette selling guy to death, I think he shld at least be put on
trial, guilty or not requires a lot more detail and argument .
the prosecutor all press charge against the officers in all them case u
mentioned. so gov't standing in these case were equal. although u may argue
that prosecutors may be soft or hard because of race, but u cannot prove
that. after all, the ultimate decision lies in dozens of ordinary citizen
who will simply made their decision quite randomly | h*********n
发帖数: 11319 | 3 所以Eric Garner case的timing比梁警官要好不成？
为什么大陪审团碰到白人警察就觉得不需要审判，碰到华人警察就会想“不管怎么样先
起诉一下看看”？
random
,
a
【在 p******e 的大作中提到】
: grand jury is just a bunch of idiot like us. their decision is pretty random
: . and they only face a binary decision, whether there is a case to be made,
: unlike the actual trial, they are not saying liang is guilty, they just
: saying he maybe and so he need to stand on trial.
: I think liang just got into this in a terrible timing. after wat happen in
: ferguson and watever happen to that cigarette selling guy. those on the
: grand jury just like us, were all reminded of how bad police brutality can
: go...
: if I were on the grand jury that day and if it was any officer other than a
: Chinese, I probably would've vote for a move to get the case on trial too,
| p******e
发帖数: 17163 | 4 the officer choke eric garner did got better timing. eric garner never
conduct felony, only multiple arrest for misdemeanor. the media felt bad for
the guy who die selling cigarette and was criticizing police abuse, and new
yorker at their dinner table seeing this poor guy die selling cig probably
start to say, hell no that aint right. and then next day they got call to
determine a case, not guilty or not, just a fair trial. it's normal they
vote for a go ahead.
but race definitely an issue. like i said, if i were on the grnad jury, if
it was a chinese officer, i'd vote for a no trial. if other than my race, i'
d vote for a trial. u can complain, but that's how the system work. the good
thing is the trial jury selection process is going to be more rigorous so
hopefully race play lesser role.
【在 h*********n 的大作中提到】
: 所以Eric Garner case的timing比梁警官要好不成？
: 为什么大陪审团碰到白人警察就觉得不需要审判，碰到华人警察就会想“不管怎么样先
: 起诉一下看看”？
:
: random
: ,
: a
| N*******M
发帖数: 3963 | 5 记住，梁警官事件是
意外，accident
意外，accident
意外，accident
意外，accident
意外，accident
意外，accident | h********2
发帖数: 51 | 6 有太多的吃里扒外的华人政客。要选票的时候，想到华人。选上后，一遇到事，就拿华
人开刀。
又想吃我们的饭，又要砸我们的饭碗。
华人要长脑子，下次拜托别再选这些吃里扒外的政客。 |
|
